New proposed national resources inventory protocols on nonfederal rangelands

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Spaeth, Kenneth E ^a   Pierson, Fred B ^a   Herrick, Jeff E ^b   Shaver, Patrick L ^c   Pyke, David A ^d   Pellant, Mike ^e   Thompson, Dennis ^f   Dayton, Bob ^g  

^a NORTHWEST WATERSHED RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d FOREST AND RANGELAND ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^e BLM   (United States)

^f USDA NRCS   (United States)

^g IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INVENTORY;

EID: 0037281142     PISSN: 00224561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Goebel, J.J. and H.D. Baker. 1992. The 1982 National Resources Inventory sample design and estimation procedures. Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
2. Herrick, J.E., W.G. Whitford, A.G. de Soyza, J.W. Van Zee, K.M. Havstad, C.A. Seybold, and M. Walton. 2001. Soil aggregate stability kit for field-based soil quality and rangeland health evaluations. Catena 44:27-35.
3. Nusser, S.M., F.J. Breidt, and W.A. Fuller. 1998. Design and estimation for investigating the dynamics of natural resources. Ecological Applications 8:234-245.
4. Nusser, S.M., and J.J. Goebel. 1997. The national resources inventory: A long-term multi-resource monitoring programme. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4:181-204.
5. Pellant, M., P.L. Shaver, D.A. Pyke, and J.E. Herrick. 2000. Interpreting indicators of rangeland health version 3. Interagency Technical Reference 1734-6, USDI-Bureau of Land Management National Science and Technology Center, Information and Communications Group, Denver, Colorado. (also available at http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/glti).
6. Pierson, F.B., D.H. Carlson, and K.E. Spaeth. 2001. A process-based submodel dynamically linked to the plant component of the simulation of production and utilization on rangelands SPUR model. Ecological Modelling 141:241-260.
7. Pyke, D.A., J.E. Herrick, P. Shaver, and M. Pellant. 2002. Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment. Journal of Range Management. 55:584-597.
8. Spaeth, K.E., F.B. Pierson, L.J. Rich, F. Busby, P.L. Shaver, and A.G. Mendenhall. 1998. State of the Nation's nonfederal rangeland: 1992 National Resource Inventory Summary: Nation, Regions, and States. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Publication, Grazingland Institute, Ft. Worth, Texas.
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1997. National range and pasture handbook. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Grazinglands Institute, Ft. Worth, Texas.
10. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2001. Resources inventory: General Manual (GM) 290-INV, Issue 1, Part 400. Washington, D.C. [RR1]
11. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
12. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service. 1976. National range handbook. NRH-1., Washington, D.C.
13. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National Resources Inventory. A guide for users of the 1982 data files. Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
14. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service. 1987. Summary report 1987. National Resources Inventory. Statistical Bulletin 790. Iowa State University, Ames Iowa.
15. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Summary report: 1992 National Resources Inventory. Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C., and Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.