Jobs-Housing Balance Revisited: Trends and Impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 492-511

  Cervero, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944510117     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944369608975714     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Association of Bay Area Governments. 1985. Jobs/Housing Balance for Traffic Mitigation, Oakland, CA:Association of Bay Area Governments.
2. Bae, Chang-Hee Christine., 1993. Air Quality and Travel Behavior:Untying the Knot. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59 (1):65–74.
3. Bookout, Lloyd., 1992. Neotraditional Town Planning:Cars, Pedestrians, and Transit. Urban Land, 51 (2):10–5.
4. Breheny, Michael., Strategic Planning and Urban Sustainability. Proceedings of the Town and Country Planning Association Conference on Planning for Sustainable Development. London:Town and Country Planning Association.
5. Burby, Raymond, and Shirley, Weiss., 1976. New Communities U.S.A, Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
6. California Air Resources Board. 1992. Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credits, Sacramento:Mobile Source Division, California Air Resources Board.
7. Cervero, Robert., 1986a. Jobs-Housing Imbalances as a Transportation Problem, Berkeley, CA:Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Research Report no. 86–9.
8. Cervero, Robert., 1986b. Suburban Gridlock, New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
9. Cervero, Robert., 1989. Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55 (2):136–50.
10. Cervero, Robert., 1991. Jobs-Housing Balance as Public Policy. Urban Land, 50 (10):10–4.
11. Cervero, Robert., 1995. Planned Communities, Self-containment and Commuting:A Cross-national Perspective. Urban Studies, 32 (7):1135–61.
12. Cervero, Robert, and Bruce, Griesenbeck., 1988. Factors Influencing Commuting Choices in Suburban Labor Markets:A Case Analysis of Pleasanton, California. Transportation Research, 22A (3):151–61.
13. Clark, William, and James, Burt., 1980. The Impact of Workplace on Residential Location. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 29:2–13.
14. Deka, Devajyoti., 1990. Employment and Residential Location Patterns in the Ottawa-Hull Region:1971–86, Montreal:McGill University, School of Urban Planning. Unpublished master's thesis
15. Dowall, David., 1984. The Suburban Squeeze:Land Conversion and Regulation in the San Francisco Bay Area, Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
16. Downs, Anthony., 1992. Stuck in Traffic:Coping with Peak-Hour Traffic Congestion, Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution.
17. Downs, Anthony., 1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America, Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution.
18. Ewing, Reid., 1995. “Before We Write Off Jobs-Housing Balance …”. In Best Development Practices:Doing the Right Thing and Making Money at the Same Time, Chicago:American Planning Association.
19. Frank, Lawrence, and Gary, Pivo., 1994. Relationships Between Land Use and Travel Behavior in the Puget Sound Region, Seattle:Washington State Transportation Center.
20. Fulton, William., 1991. Guide to California Planning, Point Arena, CA:Solano Press Books.
21. Giuliano, Genevieve., 1991. Is Jobs-Housing Balance a Transportation Issue?. Transportation Research Record, 1305:305–12.
22. Giuliano, Genevieve., 1995. The Weakening Transportation-Land Use Connection. Access, 6:3–11.
23. Giuliano, Genevieve, and Kenneth, Small., 1993. Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?. Urban Studies, 30 (9):1485–500.
24. Gordon, Peter, Richardson, Harry, and Myung-Jin, Jun., 1991. The Commuting Paradox:Evidence from the Top Twenty. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57 (4):416–20.
25. Grubler, A., 1990. The Rise and Fall of Infrastructure, Heidelberg, Germany:Physica-Verlag.
26. Hamilton, Edward, Francine, Rabinovitz F., John, Alschuler H., and Paul, Silvern J., 1991. Applying the Jobs/Housing Balance Concept. Urban Land, 50 (10):15–8.
27. Hu, P., and Young, J., 1992. Summary of Travel Trends:1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, Washington, DC:Federal Highway Administration.
28. Humphrey, T., 1990. Suburban Congestion:Recommendations for Transportation and Land Use Response. Transportation, 16:221–40.
29. Hupkes, G., 1982. The Law of Constant Travel Time and Trip Rates. Futures, 14:38–46.
30. Landis, John., 1986. Land Regulation and the Price of New Housing:Lessons from Three California Cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52 (1):9–21.
31. Leinberger, Christopher., 1993. “ Suburbia ”. In Land Use in Transition:Emerging Forces and Issues Shaping the Real Estate Environment, Washington, DC:The Urban Land Institute.
32. Leinberger, Christopher., 1995. The Changing Location of Development and Investment Opportunities. Urban Land, 54 (5):31–6.
33. Levernier, William, and Brian, Cushing., 1994. A New Look at the Determinants of the Intrametropolitan Distribution of Population and Employment. Urban Studies, 31 (8):1391–405.
34. Levinson, David, and Kumar., Ajay. 1994. The Rational Locator:Why Travel Times Have Remained Stable. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60 (3):319–32.
35. Lockwood, Charles., 1995. Edge Cities are Standing at a New Crossroads. National Real Estate Investor, 37 (5):125–6.
36. Lowry, Ira., 1988. “ Planning for Urban Sprawl ”. In Transportation Research Board Special Report 221:Looking Ahead, the Year 2000, Washington, DC:Transportation Research Board.
37. Nowlan, David, and Greg, Stewart., 1991. Downtown Population Growth and Commuting Trips. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57 (2):165–82.
38. Olenik, Thomas J., and Cheng, S., 1994. Land Development Regulations:Roadblock to Affordable Housing. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 120 (1):22–7.
39. Orski, Kenneth C., 1995. California Considers Alternatives to Trip Reduction Programs. Innovation Briefs, 6 (2):1–2.
40. Pisarski, Alan., 1992a. Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey:Travel Behavior Issues in the '90s, Washington, DC:Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
41. Pisarski, Alan., 1992b. New Perspectives on Commuting, Washington, DC:Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
42. Pollakowski, Henry, and Susan, Wachter., 1990. The Effects of Land-Use Controls on Housing Prices. Land Economics, 66 (3):315–24.
43. Purvis, Chuck., 1992. County-to-County Commute Patterns in the San Francisco Bay Area, Oakland, CA:Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Working Paper 3.
44. Quigley, John, and Weinberg, D., 1977. Intraurban Residential Mobility:A Review and Synthesis. International Regional Science Review, 1:41–66.
45. Richardson, Harry, and Peter, Gordon., 1989. Counting Non-work Trips:The Missing Link in Transportation, Land Use, and Urban Policy. Urban Land, 48 (9):6–18.
46. RIDES, Inc. 1994. Commute Profiles '94, San Francisco:RIDES for Bay Area Commuters.
47. Rosetti, Michael, and Barbara, Eversole., 1993. Journey to Work Trends in the United States and Its Major Metropolitan Areas, Cambridge, MA:John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
48. Shoup, Donald., 1995. An Opportunity to Reduce Minimum Parking Requirements. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61 (1):14–28.
49. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 1989. Air Quality Management Plan, Los Angeles:South Coast Air Quality Management District.
50. Southern California Association of Governments. 1989. Growth Management Plan, Los Angeles:Southern California Association of Governments.
51. Thomas, Ray., 1969. London's New Towns:A Study of Self Contained and Balanced Communities, London:PEP.
52. Wachs, Martin., 1995. Will Congestion Pricing Ever Be Adopted?. Access, 4:15–9.
53. Wachs, Martin, Taylor, Brian, Levine, Ned, and Paul, Ong., 1993. The Changing Commute:A Case-study of the Jobs-Housing Relationship over Time. Urban Studies, 30 (10):1711–29.
54. Wilson, A. G., 1967. A Statistical Theory of Spatial Distribution Models. Transportation Research, 9:167–79.