The discursive formation of a scientific field

Management and Organizational History

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 85-104

  Peci, Alketa ^a   Falcão Vieira, Milano Marcelo ^a  

^a FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Boundary work; Discourse; Formation; Foucault; Genetics; Power

Indexed keywords

EID: 61349101867     PISSN: 17449359     EISSN: 17449367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1744935908098860     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann. 2001. A construção social da realidade, 20th edn. Petrópolis: Vozes.
2. Bodmer, W., and R. McKie. 1994. The book of man. New York: Scribner.
3. Colignon, R.A. 1997. Power plays. New York: State University of New York.
4. Foucault, M. 1972. A arqueologia do saber [Archaeology of knowledge]. Lisboa, Porto: Vozes.
5. Gieryn, T.F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781 - 795.
6. Guston, D.H. 1999. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the office of techonology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science 29(1): 87-111.
7. Heinberg, R. 1999. Cloning the Buddha. Wheaton, IL and Chennai, India: Quest Books Theosophical Publishing House.
8. James, W. 1997. What pragmatism means. In Pragmatism: A reader, ed. L. Menand. New York: Vintage.
9. Kay, L.E. 1993. The molecular vision of life. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Kay, L.E. 2000. Who wrote the book of life? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Keller, E. 1995. Reconfiguring life. New York: California University Press.
12. Keller, E. 1992. Nature, nurture, and the Human Genome Project. In The code of codes, ed. D.J. Kevles and L. Hood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Kevles, D.J. 1992. Out of Eugenics: The historical politics of the Human Genome. In The code of codes, ed. D.J. Kevles and Hood, L. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Kuhn, T. 1987. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
15. Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Machado, R. 1979. Introduction. In Microfísica do poder, M. Foucault. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
17. Marsa, L. 1997. Prescription for profits. New York: Scribner.
18. Morente, M.G. 1980. Fundamentos de filosofia. São Paulo: Mestre Jou.
19. Powell, W.W., and P.J. DiMaggio. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160.
20. Powell, W.W., and P.J. DiMaggio, eds. 1990. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Powell, W.W. and P. DiMaggio, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Ridley, M. 2000. Genome. New York: Perennial.
23. Rorty, R. 1999 a. A pragmatist view of contemporary analytic philosophy, http://www.stanford.edu/~rrorty/pragmatistview.htm, accessed 26/11/2002.
24. Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. 1989. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387-420.
25. Vieira, M.M.F., and Carvalho, C.A. 2003. Campos organizacionais: De wallpaper à construção histórica do contexto de organizações culturais em Porto Alegre e em Recife. Paper presented at XXVII Encontro da Associação Nacional de Programas de Pós-graduação em Administração. Atibaia, SP, Brasil.
26. Zucker, L. 1987. Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 13(2): 443 - 464.