Adverbial, descriptive reciprocals

Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 333-367

  Schein, Barry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61149695483     PISSN: 15208583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2003.00013.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. C. Barker. (1993). A presuppositional account of proportional ambiguity. In U. Lahiri and A. Z. Wyner, eds. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory III, 1-18. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Cornell University.
2. C. Barker. (1996). Presuppositions for proportional quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 4.3: 237-259.
3. S. J. Barker. (1997). E-type pronouns, DRT, dynamic semantics and the quantifier/variable-binding model. Linguistics & Philosophy 20.2: 195-228.
4. G. Boolos. (1985). Nominalist Platonism. The Philosophical Review 94: 327-344.
5. Reprinted in G. Boolos (1998) Logic, Logic & Logic, 73-87. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. L. Carlson. (1982). Plural quantifiers and informational independence. Acta Philosophica Fennica 35: 163-174.
7. H. M. Cartwright. (1996). Some of a plurality. Philosophical Perspectives 10, Metaphysics.
8. M. Dalrymple, I. Hayrapetian and T. H. King. (1998). The semantics of the Russian comitative construction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16.3: 597-631.
9. M. Dalrymple, M. Kanazawa, Y. Kim, S. Mchombo and S. Peters. (1998). Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics & Philosophy 21.2: 159-210.
10. M. Davies. (1991). Acts and scenes. In N. Cooper and P. Engel, eds., New Inquiries into Meaning and Truth, 41-82. NY: St. Martin's Press.
11. R. C. Dougherty. (1974). The syntax and semantics of each other constructions. Foundations of Language 12: 1-47.
12. G. Evans. (1977). Pronouns, quantifiers and relative clauses (I). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7.3: 467-536.
13. Reprinted in G. Evans (1985) Collected Papers, 76-152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. G. Evans. (1980). Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11.2: 337-362.
15. R. W. Fiengo and H. Lasnik. (1973). The logical structure of reciprocal sentences in English. Foundations of Language 9: 447-468.
16. H. Filip and G. Carlson, (1998). Distributivity strengthens reciprocity, collectivity weakens it. Ms. University of Rochester.
17. K. von Fintel. (2001). Counterfactuals in a dynamic context. In M. Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18. E. Garrett. (1998). Weak readings: another case of apparent uniqueness violations, ms. UCLA.
19. M. Geis. (1973), If and unless. In B. J. Kachru, et al. eds., Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renee Kahane, 231-253. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
20. N. Goodman. (1947). The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44: 113-28.
21. Reprinted in F. Jackson, ed., Conditionals, 9-27. Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
22. I. Heim. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD diss. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
23. I. Heim. (1984). A note on negative polarity and downward-entailingness. In Charles Jones and Peter Sells, eds., Proceedings of NELS 14, Graduate Linguistics Student Association, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, pp. 98-107.
24. I. Heim. (1990). E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics & Philosophy 13.2: 137-177.
25. I. Heim, H. Lasnik and R. May. (1991). Reciprocity and plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22.1: 63-101.
26. J. J. Katz. (1977). Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts. Harvard University Press.
27. W. Ladusaw. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
28. D. T. Langendoen. (1978). The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9.2: 177-197.
29. P. Ludlow. (1994). Conditionals, events and unbound pronouns. Lingua e Stile 29.2: 165-183.
30. W. G. Lycan. (1984). A syntactically motivated theory of conditionals. In P. French, T. E. Uehling and H. Wettstein, eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy IX: Causation and Causal Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31. W. G. Lycan. (1991). Even and even if. Linguistics & Philosophy 14.2: 115-150.
32. W. G. Lycan. (2001). Real Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. J. D. McCawley. (1981). Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know About Logic* *but were ashamed to ask. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. P. M. Pietroski, (2000). Other things being equal. In Causing Actions, 117-146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Revised version of essay (1995) British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 81-110.
36. B. Schein. (1993). Plurals and Events. Current Studies in Linguistics No. 23. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37. B. Schein. (1997). Conjunction Reduction Redux, ms. USC. www-rcf.usc.edu/∼schein/crrchap1.pdf
38. L. K. Schubert and F. J. Pelletier. (1989). Generically speaking, or, using Discourse Representation Theory to interpret generics. In G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee and R. Turner, eds., Properties, Types and Meaning. Vol. II: Semantic Issues. 193-268. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39. R. Schwarzschild. (1992). Types of plural individuals. Linguistics & Philosophy 15.6: 641-675.
40. R. Schwarzschild. (1996). Pluralities. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41. R. Sharvy. (1980). A more general theory of definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 89.4: 607-624.
42. R. Stalnaker. (1968). A theory of conditionals. From Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph: 2, 98-112. Oxford: Blackwcll.
43. Reprinted in F. Jackson, ed., (1991) Conditionals, Oxford Readings in Philosophy, 28-45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. B. Taylor. (1985). Modes of Occurrence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
45. K. Wilkinson. (1996). Bare plurals, plural pronouns and the Partitive Constraint. In J. Hoeksema, ed., Partitives: Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of Partitive and Related Constructions. Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics, 14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.