Presuppositions for proportional quantifiers

Natural Language Semantics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 237-259

  Barker, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248786473     PISSN: 0925854X     EISSN: 1572865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00372821     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barker, Chris: 1995, Possessive Descriptions, CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.
2. Bäuerle, Rainer and U. Egli: 1985, 'Anapher, Nominalphrase und Eselssätze', Papier 105 des Sonderforschungsbereichs 99, Universität Konstanz.
3. Chierchia, Gennaro: 1992, 'Anaphora and Dynamic Binding', Linguistics and Philosophy 15(2), 111-183.
4. Gawron, Jean Mark, John Nerbonne and Stanley Peters: 1991, 'The Absorption Principle and E-Type Anaphora', in J. Barwise et al. (eds.), Situation Theory and Its Applications, vol. 2, CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.
5. Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
6. Heim, Irene: 1990, 'E-Type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137-177.
7. Jacobs, Joachim: 1991, 'Focus Ambiguities', Journal of Semantics 8, 1-36.
8. Kadmon, Nirit: 1987, On Unique and Non-unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
9. Kadmon, Nirit: 1990, 'Uniqueness', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 273-324.
10. Kanazawa, Makoto: 1994, Weak vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences and Monotonicity Inference in a Dynamic Setting', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 109-158.
11. Kang, YoungEun Yoon: 1994, Weak and Strong Interpretations of Quantifiers and Definite NPs in English and Korean, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
12. Kratzer, Angelika: 1989, 'An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607-653.
13. Kratzer, Angelika: 1995, 'Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates', in G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 125-175.
14. Krifka, Manfred: 1992, 'A Framework for Focus-Sensitive Quantification', in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, OSUWPL vol. 40, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, pp. 215-236.
15. Lewis, David: 1975, 'Adverbs of Quantification', in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3-15.
16. Partee, Barbara: 1984, 'Nominal and Temporal Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243-286.
17. Roberts, Craige: 1995, 'Domain Restriction in Dynamic Semantics', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 54, Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 661-700.
18. Root, Rebecca: 1985, The Semantics of Anaphora in Discourse, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
19. Rooth, Mats: 1987, 'NP Interpretation in Montague Grammer, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics', in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 237-268.
20. Schubert, Lenhart K. and Francis Jeffry Pelletier: 1989, 'Generically Speaking', in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee and R. Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, vol. 2: Semantic Issues, pp. 193-268.
21. de Swart, Henriëtte: 1991, Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.