Where are the cultural-historical critiques of back to the basics?

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 269-278

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61149233205     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749030802390981     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Barker, S. (1999). Why Latin? National Committee for Latin & Greek. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.promotelatin.org/whylatin.htm
2. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
3. Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Bruer, J. T. (2007). The brain/education barrier. Science, 317, 1293
4. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
5. Lott, J. (Ed.). (1999). Back to the basics or forward to the basics-Which philosophy should we embrace. Mathematics Education Dialogues, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?Linkldentifier=id&ItemID=8092
6. Roth, W.-M. (2003). Toward an anthropology of graphing: Semiotic and activity-theoretic perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
7. Scribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: some characteristics of practical thought. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 13-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press