Perception

Psychology of Entertainment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 55-70

  Shrum, L J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61049400178     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In J. S. Carroll & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior (pp. 33-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.
3. Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. E. (1931). A study of values. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
4. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and unconscious prejudice. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium Vol.7,55-76)pp.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bargh, J. A., Bond, R. N., Lombardi, W. J., & Tota, M. E. (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869-878.
6. Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
7. Berkowitz, L. (1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti-and prosocial influences of media events: A cognitiveneoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410-427.
8. Berkowitz, L., & Alioto, J. (1973). The meaning of an observed event as a determinant of its aggressive consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 206-217.
9. Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition, Vol.(XI,1-52), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). On the dialectics of discrimination: Dual processes in social stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology pp.(271-290).New York: Guilford.
11. Bruner, J. S. (1951). Personality dynamics and the process of perceiving. In R. Blake & G. Ramsey (Eds.), Perception: An approach to personality. New York: Ronald.
12. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
13. Bruner, J. S. (1958). Social psychology and perception. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology pp.(85-94). 3rd ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14. Bruner, J. S. (1992). Another look at New Look 1. American Psychologist, 47, 780-782.
15. Bruner, J. S. (1994). The view from the heart's eye: A commentary. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 269-286). New York: Academic Press.
16. Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1947a). Emotional selectivity in perception and reaction. Journal of Personality, 16, 69-77.
17. Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1947b). Tension and tension release as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Personality, 15, 300-308.
18. Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223.
19. Busselle, R. W. (2004). Television realism measures: The influence of program salience on global judgments. Communication Research Reports, 20, 367-375.
20. Busselle, R. W., & Greenberg, B. S. (2000). The nature of television realism judgments: A reevaluation of their conceptualization and measurement. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 249-268.
21. Busselle, R.W., &, Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and the accessibility of social information. Media Psychology, 5, 255-282.
22. Coleridge, S. T. (1967). Biographia literaria. In D. Perkins (Ed.), English romantic writers. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
23. Cooper, E., & Jahoda, M. (1947). The evasion of propaganda: How prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda. Journal of Psychology, 23, 15-25.
24. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
25. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
26. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. Erdelyi, M. H. (1974). A new look at the New Look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review, 81, 1-25.
28. Erdelyi, M. H. (1983). Psychoanalysis: Freud's cognitive psychology. New York: W. H. Freeman.
29. Erdelyi, M. H. (1992). Psychodynamics and the unconscious. American Psychologist, 47, 784-787.
30. Erdelyi, M. H. (2004). Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 73-91.
31. Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Fazio, R. H., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R.,&Powell,M.C. (1994). Attitudes, perceptions, and attention. In P.M.Niedenthal &S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 197-216). New York: Academic Press.
33. Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 97-116). New York: Guilford.
34. Feshbach, S. (1972). Reality and fantasy in filmed violence. In J. Murray, E. Rubinstein, & G. Comstock (Eds.), Television and social behavior Vol.(2, pp. 318-345). Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
35. Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W. (1980). What does the schema concept buy us? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 543-557.
36. Geen, R. (1975). The meaning of observed violence: Real versus fictional violence and effects of aggression and emotional arousal. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 270-281.
37. Geen, R.,&Rakosky, J. (1973). Interpretations of observed violence and their effects of GSR. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 289-292.
38. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research pp.(43-67). 2nd ed., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Gerrig, R. J. (1993) Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
42. Green, M. C., Garst, J.,&Brock, T. C. (2004). The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 161-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766-779.
44. Hall, A. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences' evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of Communication, 53, 624-641.
45. Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129-134.
46. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
47. Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some "activation rules" influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218-243.
48. Higgins, E.T.,&King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction (pp. 69-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Higgins, E. T., King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35-47.
50. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
51. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
52. Lau, R. R. (1989). Construct accessibility and electoral choice. Political Behavior, 11, 5-32.
53. Lazarus, R. S., Eriksen, C. W., & Fonda, C. P. (1951). Personality dynamics and auditory perceptual recognition. Journal of Personality, 19, 471-482.
54. Lepore, L., & Brown, R. J. (1997). Automatic stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275-287.
55. Lombardi,W. J., Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). The role of consciousness in priming effects on categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 411-429.
56. Martin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: The use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 593-504.
57. Moskowitz, G. B., Salomon, A. R., & Taylor, C. M. (2000). Preconsciously controlling stereotyping: Implicitly activated egalitarian goals prevent activation of stereotypes. Social Cognition, 18, 151-177.
58. O'Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 278-294.
59. Oliver, M. B. (1994). Portrayals of crime, race, and aggression in "reality-based" police shows: A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 179-192.
60. Petty, R. E.,&Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Postman, L., Bruner, J. S., & McGinnies, E. (1948). Personal values as selective factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 142-154.
62. Prentice, D. A., & Gerrig, R. J. (1999). Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 529-546). New York: Guilford.
63. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (1996). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactive model. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 pp.(185-225). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198-211.
65. Shapiro, M. A., & Chock, T. M. (2003). Psychological processes in perceiving reality. Media Psychology, 5, 163-198.
66. Shapiro, M. A., & Fox, J. R. (2002). The role of typical and atypical events in story memory. Human Communication Research, 28, 109-135.
67. Shrum, L. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22, 482-509.
68. Shrum, L. J. (1999). The relationship of television viewing with attitude strength and extremity: Implications for the cultivation effect. Media Psychology, 1, 3-25.
69. Shrum, L. J. (2006). Cultivation and social cognition. In D. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. Monahan (Eds.), Communication: Social Cognition Theories and Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70. Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E.,&Rindfleisch, A. (2004). A process model of consumer cultivation: The role of television is a function of the type of judgment. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion pp.(177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Shrum, L. J.,&O'Guinn, T. C. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436-471.
72. Shrum, L. J., O'Guinn, T. C., Semenik, R. J., & Faber, R. J. (1991). Processes and effects in the construction of normative consumer beliefs: The role of television. In R. H. Holman & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in consumer research Vol.(18, pp. 755-763). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
73. Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.
74. Srull, T. K., &Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
75. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841-856.
76. Vidmar, N., & Rokeach, M. (1974). Archie Bunker's bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 24, 36-47.
77. Wilson, B., & Busselle, R.W. (2004, May). Transportation into the narrative and perceptions of media realism. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans.
78. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
79. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.