Minding the gap: Annotation as preparation for discussion

Arts and Humanities in Higher Education

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 295-307

  Feito, José Alfonso ^a   Donahue, Patricia ^b  

^a SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAFAYETTE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Annotation; Difficulty; Discussion; Pedagogy; Reading; Student readers

Indexed keywords

EID: 61049334563     PISSN: 14740222     EISSN: 1741265X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1474022208094413     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bahktin, M.M. (1982) The Dialogic Imagination (ed. M. Holquist, trans. V. Liapunov and K. Brostrom) Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Blair, A. (2003) 'Reading Strategies for Coping With Information Overload, ca. 1550-1700'. Journal of the History of Ideas 64(1): 15-28.
3. Ingold, Tim (2007) Lines: A Brief History. Oxford: Routledge.
4. Iser, W. (1978) The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
5. Iser W (2006) 'The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach', in D. Richter (ed.) The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, pp. 956-68. New York: Bedford/St Martins.
6. Jackson, H.J. (2002) Marginalia: Readers Writing in Books. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Salvatori, M. (1988) 'Toward a Hermeneutics of Difficulty', in L. Smith (ed.) Audits of Meaning: A Festschrift in Honor of Ann E. Berthoff, pp. 80-95. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
8. Salvatori, M. and Donahue, P. (2005) The Elements (and Pleasures) of Difficulty. New York: Pearson Education.
9. Tannen, D. (2000) 'Agonism in the Academy: Surviving Higher Learning's Argument Culture'. Chronicle of Higher Education 46(30): 1651-69.