The influence of teaching-career level and primary performance instrument on the assessment of music performance

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 314-327

  Hewitt, Michael P ^a   Smith, Bret P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b School of Music   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60950131902     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002242940405200404     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barry, N. H. (1992). The effects of practice strategies, individual differences in cognitive style, and gender upon technical accuracy and musicality of student instrumental performance. Psychology of Music, 20, 112-123
2. Bergee, M.J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19-27
3. Bergee, M.J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601-612
4. Bergee, M.J. (2003). Faculty interjudge reliability of music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 137-150
5. Boyle, D.J., & Radocy, R. E. (1987). Measurement and evaluation of musical experiences. New York: Schirmer
6. Burnsed, V., & King, S. (1987). How reliable is your festival rating? Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 5 (3), 12-13
7. Byo, J. L. (1997). Effects of texture and number of parts on die ability of music majors to detect performance errors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 51-66
8. Byo, J. L., & Brooks, R. (1994). A comparison of junior high musicians' and music educators' performance evaluations of instrumental music. Contributions to Music Education, 21, 26-38
9. Colwell, R. (1970). Evaluation of music teaching and learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
10. Cooksey, J. M. (1977). A facet-factorial approach to rating high school choral music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 100-114
11. Doerksen, P. F. (1999). Aural-diagnostic and prescriptive skills of preservice and expert instrumental music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 78-88
12. Ekholm, E. (1997). Evaluation of solo vocal performance: A comparison of students with experts. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 16 (1), 3-7
13. Elliott, C. A. (1995/1996). Race and gender as factors in judgments of musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 127, 50-55
14. Fiske, H. E., Jr. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186-202
15. Fiske, H. E. (1977). Relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 256-263
16. Fiske, H. E. (1979). Musical performance evaluation ability: Toward a model of specificity. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 59, 27-31
17. Gillespie, R. (1997). Ratings of violin and viola vibrato performance in audio-only and audiovisual presentations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 212-220
18. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (2002, June). Model standards for licensing classroom teachers and specialists in the arts: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers
19. Lindeman, C. A. (Ed.). (2003). Benchmarks in action: A guide to standards-based assessment in music. Reston, VA: MENC: The National Association for Music Education
20. Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
21. Mills, J. (1987). Assessment of solo musical performance: A preliminary study. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 91, 119-125
22. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Trends in mathematics and science study. Retrieved November 3, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss
23. Pacey, F. (1993). Schema theory and the effect of variable practice in string teaching. British Journal of Music Education, 10, 91-102
24. Persky, H. R., Sandene, B. A., & Askew, J. M. (1998). National Assessment of Educational Progress 1997 arts report card. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=1999486
25. Saunders, T. C., & Holahan, J. M. (1997). Criteria-specific rating scales in the evaluation of high school instrumental performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 259-272
26. Schleff, J. S. (1992). Critical judgments of undergraduate music education students in response to recorded music performances. Contributions to Music Education, 19, 60-74
27. Thorndike, R. M. (1997). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
28. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved November 3, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb
29. Wapnick, J., Flowers, P., Alegant, M., & Jasinskas, L. (1993). Consistency in piano performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 282-292
30. Wapnick, J., Mazza, J. K., & Darrow, A. (1998). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on violin performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 510-521
31. Wapnick, J., & Rosenquist, M. (1991). Preferences of undergraduate music majors for sequenced versus performed piano music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 152-160
32. Zdzinski, S. F., & Barnes, G. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 245-255