메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 96-108

The 'Schlieffen plan' and German war guilt

(1)  Zuber, Terence a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 60949868611     PISSN: 09683445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0968344507071042     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (6)

References (18)
  • 1
    • 60950145529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Real Schlieffen Plan
    • R. Foley, 'The Real Schlieffen Plan', War in History XIII (2006), pp. 91-115.
    • (2006) War in History , vol.13 , pp. 91-115
    • Foley, R.1
  • 5
    • 30844458524 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Origins of the Schlieffen Plan
    • For a previous attempt, see R. Foley, 'The Origins of the Schlieffen Plan', War in History X (2003), pp. 222-32,
    • (2003) War in History , vol.10 , pp. 222-232
    • Foley, R.1
  • 6
    • 37349024456 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Schlieffen Plan Was an Orphan
    • and my rebuttal, T. Zuber, 'The Schlieffen Plan Was an Orphan', War in History XI (2004), pp. 220-25.
    • (2004) War in History , vol.11 , pp. 220-225
    • Zuber, T.1
  • 10
    • 79953574799 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • It also possible that Foley failed to translate Ludendorff correctly. The pasage in question is not an easy one. As Terence Holmes noted in his review of Foley's book Alfred von Schlieffen's Military Writings, Foley's 'translation is marred by numerous errors, a few examples of which are given here to show how far they may distort the sense of the original', so much so that 'the translation itself is not sufficiently reliable to earn wholehearted recommendation'. War in History XI (2004), p. 454.
    • (2004) War in History , vol.11 , pp. 454
  • 12
    • 30844445324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Foley says that after the war the 'Schlieffen plan' documents were the property of Schlieffen's daughter Elizabeth and her husband, Wilhelm von Hahnke (op. cit., p. 94). The real question is, who had possession of the Schlieffen plan documents before the war? The note in the Schlieffen plan file says they belonged to Elizabeth and Maria von Schlieffen. Hahnke is not mentioned. This is confirmed by the official history of the German archives. (Zuber, Inventing the Schlieffen Plan, p. 45.)
    • Inventing the Schlieffen Plan , pp. 45
    • Zuber1
  • 15
    • 79953378636 scopus 로고
    • Berlin, 272, 282, 297, 300ff
    • Reichsarchiv, Der Weltkrieg V (Berlin, 1929), pp. 5-6, 272, 282, 297, 300ff.
    • (1929) Der Weltkrieg , vol.5 , pp. 5-6
    • Reichsarchiv1
  • 16
    • 79953447454 scopus 로고
    • Historical Evaluation and Research Organization
    • Dunn Loring, VA
    • See also Historical Evaluation and Research Organization, German and Allied Reserves in 1914 (Dunn Loring, VA, 1980), pp. 5-64.
    • (1980) German and Allied Reserves in 1914 , pp. 5-64
  • 18


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.