Development and validation of an orchestra performance rating scale

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 268-280

  Smith, Bret P ^a   Barnes, Gail V ^b  

^a CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949845995     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002242940705500307     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abeles, H. F. (1973). The development of a clarinet performance adjudication scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21, 246-255
2. Asmus, E. P. (1989). Factor analysis: A look at the technique through the data of Rainbow. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 101, 1-29
3. Barnes, G. V., & McCashin, R. (2005). Practices and procedures in state adjudicated orchestra festivals. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 23 (2), 34-41
4. Bell, J., Daugherty, E., Hamann, D. L., Koozer, R., & Mills, C. (1990). Classroom environment as related to contest ratings among high school performing groups. Journal of Research in Music Education, 3, 215-224
5. Bergee, M. J. (1987-88). The use of an objectively constructed rating scale for the evaluation of brass juries: A criterion-related study. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 5 (5), 6-25
6. Bergee, M. J. (1989). An investigation into the efficacy of using an objectively constructed rating scale for the evaluation of university-level single-reed juries. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 74-91
7. Bergee, M. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19-27
8. Bergee, M. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601-612
9. Burnsed, V., Hinkle, D., & King, S. (1985). Performance evaluation reliability at selected concert festivals. Journal of Band Research, 21, 22-29
10. Conrad, D. (2003). Judging the judges: Improving rater reliability at music contests. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.manteno5.org/ finearts /assessment/judgereliability.pdf
11. Cooksey, J. M. (1977). A facet-factorial approach to rating high school choral music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 100-114
12. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10 (7). Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7
13. DCamp, C. B. (1980). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for high school band performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 1462A
14. Fiske, H. E. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186-202
15. Garman, B. R., Boyle, J. D., & DeCarbo, N. J. (1991). Orchestra festival evaluations: Interjudge agreement and relationships between performance categories and final ratings. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 2, 19-24
16. Hewitt, M. P., & Smith, B. P. (2004). The influence of teaching-career level and primary performance instrument on the assessment of music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 314-327
17. Johnson, E. G. (1992). The design of the National Assessment of Educational Progress [Electronic version]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29 (2), 95-110
18. Kamakura, W. A., & Wedel, M. (2000). Factor analysis and missing data [Electronic version]. Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (4), 490-498
19. Montgomery, D. C. (2005). Design and analysis of experiments (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
20. Sagen, D. P. (1983). The development and validation of a university band performance rating scale. Journal of Band Research, 18 (2), 1-11
21. Smith, B. P. (2004). Five judges' evaluation of audiotaped string performance in international competition. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 160, 61-70
22. Smith, G. T., & McCarthy, D. M. (1995). Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 300-308
23. Thompson, S., & Williamon, A. (2003). Evaluating evaluation: Music performance assessment as a research tool. Music Perception, 21 (1), 21-41
24. Urbaniak, G., & Plous, S. (2000). Research randomizer: Instant random sampling and random assignment. Retrieved March 11, 2004, from http://www.randomizer.org
25. Weng, L. J. (2004). Impact of the number of response categories and anchor labels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability [Electronic version]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64 (6), 956-972
26. Zdzinski, S., & Barnes, G. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 245-255