Effects of verbal corrections on student attitude and performance

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 482-495

  Duke, Robert A ^a   Henninger, Jacqueline C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949550363     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3345345     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bandura, A. (1994). Regulative function of perceived self-efficacy. In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Ed.), Personnel selection and classification (pp. 261-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
3. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
4. Buckner, J. L. J. (1997). Assessment of teacher and student behavior in relation to the accomplishment of performance goals in piano lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
5. Byo, J. L. (1994). Tracing the evolution of a research line: The role of sequential patterns in structuring the rehearsal. Journal of the World Association of Symphonic Bands and Ensembles, 1, 67-79.
6. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363-423.
7. Cavitt, M. E. (1998). Systematic observation of error correction procedures in the rehearsals of excellent middle school and high school band directors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
8. Colprit, E. J. (1998). Observation and analysis of Suzuki string teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
10. Duke, R. A. (1987). Observation of applied music instruction: The perceptions of trained and untrained observers. In C. K Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Ed.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 115-124). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
11. Duke, R A. (1994). Bringing the art of rehearsing into focus: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of rehearsal conducting. Journal of Band Research, 30 (1), 78-95.
12. Duke, R A. (1997, November). Measures of instructional effectiveness in music research. Research presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Music Therapy, Los Angeles, CA.
13. Duke, R A., & Blackman, M. D. (1991). The relationship between observers' recorded teacher behavior and evaluation of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 290-297.
14. Duke, R A., & Madsen, C. K. (1991). Proactive versus reactive teaching: Focusing observation on specific aspects of instruction. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 108, 1-14.
15. Duke, R. A., & Prickett, C. A. (1987). The effect of differentially focused observation on evaluation of instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 27-37.
16. Forsythe, J. L. (1977). Elementary student attending behavior as a function of classroom activities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 228-239.
17. Goolsby, T. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 286-303.
18. Goolsby, T W. (1997). Verbal instruction in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of three career levels and preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 20-40.
19. Hendel, C. (1995). Behavioral characteristics and instructional patterns of selected music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 189-203.
20. Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 383-390.
21. Kuhn, T L. (1975). The effect of teacher approval and disapproval on attentiveness, musical achievement, and attitude of fifth-grade students. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Ed.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 40-55). New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Madsen, C. K., & Alley, J. M. (1979). The effect of reinforcement on attentive-ness: A comparison of behaviorally trained music therapists and other professionals with implications for competency-based academic preparation. Journal of Music Therapy, 16, 70-89.
23. Madsen, C. H., Jr., & Madsen, C. K (1983). Teaching/Discipline: A positive approach to educational development (3rd ed.). Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing.
24. Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985a). Observation of teacher/student interactions in music: Observer perceptions versus actual events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205-214.
25. Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985b). Perception of approval/disapproval in music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 85, 119-130.
26. Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1993). Selection and development of prospective music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 3 (1), 5-11.
27. Madsen, C. K., Standley, J. M., Byo, J. L., & Cassidy, J. W. (1992). Assessment of effective teaching by instrumental music student teachers and experts. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 10 (2), 20-24.
28. Murray, K C. (1975). The effect of teacher approval/disapproval on musical performance, attentiveness, and attitude of high school choruses. In C. K Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Ed.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 165-181). New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Price, H. E. (1983). The effect of conductor academic task presentation, conductor reinforcement, and ensemble practice on performers' musical achievement, attentiveness, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 245-257.
30. Price, H. E. (1992). Sequential patterns of instruction and learning to use them. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 14-29.
31. Price, H. E., & Yarbrough, C. (1991). Validation of sequential patterns of instruction in music. Canadian Music Educator [Research Edition)] 33, 165-174.
32. Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736-750.
33. Schmidt, C. P. (1989). Individual differences in the perception of applied music teaching feedback. Psychology of Music, 17, 110-122.
34. Schmidt, C. P. (1995). Attributions of success, grade level, and gender as factors in choral students' perceptions of teacher feedback. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 313-329.
35. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
36. Siebenaler, D. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of children and adults. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 6-20.
37. Yarbrough, C. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134-146.
38. Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 209-217.
39. Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E. (1989). Sequential patterns of instruction in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 179-187.
40. Younger, K. G. (1998). An observational analysis of instructional effectiveness in intermediate level band and orchestra rehearsals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
41. Younger-Flores, K (1995, April). Comparison of a computer assisted systematic observation instrument to independent, global measures of instructional effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.