A mortar method for energy-momentum conserving schemes in frictionless dynamic contact problems

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1468-1500

  Hesch, Christian ^a   Betsch, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contact; Energy conserving; Finite element method; Mortar method; Solids; Time integration

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; MORTAR; PLASTER;

ACTIVE SETS; CONTACT; CONTACT CONSTRAINTS; CONTACT PROBLEMS; ENERGY CONSERVING; FRICTIONLESS DYNAMIC CONTACTS; IMPACT PROBLEMS; ITERATIVE SOLUTIONS; LARGE DEFORMATIONS; MOMENTUM CONSERVING; MORTAR METHOD; NULL SPACES; NUMERICAL EXAMPLES; NUMERICAL STABILITIES; SADDLE POINT SYSTEMS; TIME INTEGRATION; TIME-STEPPING SCHEMES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 60949108081     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2466     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Gonzalez O. Time integration and discrete Hamiltonian systems. Journal of Nonlinear Sciences 1996; 6:449-467.
2. Gonzalez O. Mechanical systems subject to holonomic constraints: differential-algebraic formulations and conservative integration. Physica D 1999; 132:165-174.
3. Betsch P, Hesch C. Energy-momentum conserving schemes for frictionless dynamic contact problems. Part I: NTS method. In IUTAM Symposium on Computational Methods in Contact Mechanics, Wriggers P, Nackenhorst U (eds). IUTAM Bookseries, vol. 3. Springer: Berlin, 2007; 77-96.
4. Laursen TA. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics. Springer: Berlin, 2002.
5. Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics (2nd edn). Springer: Berlin, 2006.
6. McDevitt TW, Laursen TA. A mortar-finite element formulation for frictional contact problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 48:1525-1547.
7. Puso MA, Laursen TA. A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193:601-629.
8. Hüeber S, Wohlmuth BI. A primal-dual active set strategy for non-linear multibody contact problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194:3147-3166.
9. Yang B, Laursen TA, Meng X. Two dimensional mortar contact methods for large deformation frictional sliding. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 62:1183-1225.
10. Fischer KA, Wriggers P. Frictionless 2d contact formulations for finite deformations based on the mortar method. Computational Mechanics 2005; 36:226-244.
11. Brunssen S, Schmid F, Schäfer M, Wohlmuth B. A fast and robust iterative solver for nonlinear contact problems using a primal-dual active set strategy and algebraic multigrid. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 69:524-543.
12. Hartmann S, Brunssen S, Ramm E, Wohlmuth BI. Unilateral non-linear dynamic contact of thin-walled structures using a primal-dual active set strategy. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 70(8):883-912.
13. Puso MA, Laursen TA, Solberg J. A segment-to-segment mortar contact method for quadratic elements and large deformations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197:555-566.
14. Géradin M, Cardona A. Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach. Wiley: New York, 2001.
15. Leyendecker S, Betsch P, Steinmann P. The discrete null space method for the energy consistent integration of constrained mechanical systems. Part III: flexible multibody dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics 2008; 19(1-2):45-72.
16. Laursen TA, Chawla V. Design of energy conserving algorithms for frictionless dynamic contact problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1997; 40:863-886.
17. Armero F, Petöcz E. Formulation and analysis of conserving algorithms for frictionless dynamic contact/impact problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 158:269-300.
18. Laursen TA, Love GR. Improved implicit integrators for transient impact problems - geometric admissibility within the conserving framework. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 53:245-274.
19. Hauret P, Le Tallec P. Energy-controlling time integration methods for nonlinear elastodynamics and low-velocity impact. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:4890-4916.
20. Haikal G, Hjelmstad KD. A finite element formulation of non-smooth contact based on oriented volumes for quadrilateral and hexahedral elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007; 196:4690-4711.
21. Hughes TJR. The Finite Element Method. Dover: New York, 2000.
22. Simo JC, Wriggers P, Taylor RL. A perturbed Lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1985; 50:163-180.
23. Papadopoulos P, Taylor RL. A mixed formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 94:373-389.
24. Zavarise G, Wriggers P. A segment-to-segment contact strategy. Mathematical and Computational Modelling 1998; 28:497-515.
25. Truesdell C, Noll W. The Non-linear Field Theories of Mechanics. Springer: Berlin, 2004.
26. Antman SS. Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity (2nd edn). Springer: Berlin, 2005.
27. Simo JC, Tarnow N. The discrete energy-momentum method. Conserving algorithms for nonlinear elastodynamics. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik (ZAMP) 1992; 43:757-792.
28. Betsch P. The discrete null space method for the energy consistent integration of constrained mechanical systems. Part I: holonomic constraints. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194:5159-5190.
29. Benzi M, Golub GH, Liesen J. Numerical solution of saddle point problems. Acta Numerica 2005; 14:1-137.
30. Krause R, Wohlmuth BI. Nonconforming domain decomposition techniques for linear elasticity. East-West Journal of Numerical Mathematics 2000; 8(3):177-206.
31. Ainsworth M. Essential boundary conditions and multi-point constraints in finite element analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 190:6323-6339.
32. Muñoz JJ. Modelling unilateral frictionless contact using the null-space method and cubic B-spline interpolation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197:979-993.
33. Chow E, Manteuffel TA, Tong C, Wallin BK. Algebraic elimination of slide surface constraints in implicit structural analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 57:1129-1144.
34. Belytschko T, Daniel WJT, Ventura G. A monolithic smoothing-gap algorithm for contact-impact based on the signed distance function. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 55:101-125.
35. Wriggers P, Van TV, Stein E. Finite element formulations of large deformation impact-contact problems with friction. Computers and Structures 1990; 37:319-331.