Domain decomposition of stochastic PDEs: Theoretical formulations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 689-701

  Sarkar, Abhijit ^a,d   Benabbou, Nabil ^b   Ghanem, Roger ^c  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Domain decomposition; Polynomial chaos; Random media; Schur complement method; Stochastic finite element

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; RANDOM PROCESSES; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; RANDOM MEDIA; SCHUR COMPLEMENT METHOD; STOCHASTIC FINITE ELEMENT;

DECOMPOSITION;

EID: 60949087479     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2431     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Farhat C. A Lagrange multiplier based divide and conquer finite element algorithm. Journal of Computing Systems in Engineering 1991; 12(1):149-156.
2. Farhat C, Roux F. A method of finite element tearing and interconnecting and its parallel solution algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1991; 32:1205-1227.
3. Farhat C, Roux F. Implicit Parallel Processing in Structural Mechanics. Computer Mechanics Advances, vol. 2. 1994; 1-124.
4. Farhat C, Chen PS, Mandel J. A scalable Lagrange multiplier based domain decomposition method for implicit time-dependent problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1995; 38:3831-3858.
5. Farhat C, Chen PS, Mandel J, Roux FX. The two-level FETI method - part ii: extension to shell problems, parallel implementation and performance results. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 155:153-180.
6. Keyes D. How scalable is domain decomposition in practice? Proceedings of International Conference on Domain Decomposition Methods, 1998; 286-297.
7. Bhardwaj M, Day D, Farhat C, Lesoinne M, Pierson K, Rixen D. Application of the FETI method to ASCI problems - scalability results on 1000 processors and discussion of highly heterogeneous problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 47:513-535.
8. Mavriplis DJ. Parallel performance investigations of an unstructured mesh Navier-Stokes solver. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 2002; 11:395-407.
9. Kim SJ, Lee CS, Kim JH, Joh M, Lee S. Ipsap: a high-performance parallel finite element code for large-scale structural analysis based on domain-wise multifrontal technique. ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, Washington, DC, U.S.A., IEEE Computer Society Press: Silver Spring, MD, 2003; 32.
10. Akcelik V, Bielak J, Biros G, Epanomeritakis I, Fernandez A, Ghattas O, Kim EJ, Lopez J, O'Hallaron D, Tu T, Urbanic J. High resolution forward and inverse earthquake modeling on terascale computers. ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, Phoenix, AZ, U.S.A., 2003; 52-74.
11. Akcelik V, Biros G, Draganescu A, Hill J, Ghattas O, Waanders BVB. Dynamic data-driven inversion for terascale simulations: real-time identification of airborne contaminants. ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, Seattle, WA, U.S.A., 2005; 43.
12. Mavriplis DJ, Aftosmis MJ, Berger M. High resolution aerospace applications using the nasa columbia supercomputer. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 2007; 21:106-126.
13. Marsden RH, Croft TN, Lai CH. Domain decomposition using a 2-level correction scheme. Computational Science ICCS. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002; 480-489.
14. MPI-2: Extensions to the Message-Passing Interface, 2003. http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi2-report.pdf.
15. Ghanem R, Spanos PD. Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer: New York, U.S.A., 1991.
16. Soize C. Random matrix theory for modeling uncertainties in computational mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194(12-16):1333-1366.
17. Adhikari S. A non-parametric approach for uncertainty quantification in elastodynamics. Forty-Seventh AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHSASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Newport, RI, U.S.A., 2006.
18. Bjorstad P, Smith B, Gropp W. Domain Decomposition, Parallel Multilevel Methods for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1996.
19. Quarteroni A, Valli A. Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Oxford Science Publications: Oxford, 1999.
20. Toselli A, Widlund O. Domain Decomposition Methods - Algorithms and Theory. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 34. Springer: New York, 2004.
21. Acebron JA, Spigler R. A new probabilistic approach to the domain decomposition method. Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XVI. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007; 473-480.
22. Natarajan R. Domain decomposition using spectral expansions of steklov poincare operators. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1997; 18(4):1187-1199.
23. LAPACK Users' Guide Third Edition, 1999. http://www.netlib.org/lapack/.
24. Pellissetti M, Ghanem R. Iterative solution of systems of linear equations arising in the context of the stochastic FEM. Advances in Engineering Software 2000; 31:607-616.