A New Probabilistic Approach to the Domain Decomposition Method

Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering

Volumn 55, Issue , 2007, Pages 473-480

  Acebrón, Juan A ^a   Spigler, Renato ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

^b ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

ELLIPTIC BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM; FAULT-TOLERANT; NUMERICAL SCHEME; PERFORMANCE AND SCALABILITIES; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC METHODS; QUASI-MONTE CARLO; TIME DECOMPOSITIONS;

DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS;

EID: 38049136161     PISSN: 14397358     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-34469-8_59     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J. A. Acebrón, M. P. Busico, P. Lanucara, and R. Spigler, Domain decomposition solution of elliptic boundary-value problems via Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 27 (2005), pp. 440-457.
2. J. A. Acebrón, M. P. Busico, P. Lanucara, and R. Spigler, Probabilistically-induced domain decomposition methods for elliptic boundary-value problems, J. Comput. Phys., 210 (2005), pp. 421-438.
3. J. A. Acebrón and R. Spigler, Fast simulations of stochastic dynamical systems, J. Comput. Phys., 208 (2005), pp. 106-115.
4. R. E. Caflisch, Monte Carlo and quasi Monte Carlo methods, Acta Numerica, (1998), pp. 1-50.
5. M. Dryja and O. B. Widlund, Domain decomposition algorithms with small overlap, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 15 (1994), pp. 604-620.
6. C. Farhat and M. Chandesris, Time-decomposed parallel time-integrators: theory and feasibility studies for fluid, structure, and fluid-structure applications, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 58 (2003), pp. 1397-1434.
7. M. I. Freidlin, Functional integration and partial differential equations, vol. 109 of Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, 1985.
8. A. Geist, Progress towards petascale virtual machines, in 10th European PVM/MPI User's Group Meeting, Venice, Italy, September/October 2003, Proceedings, J. Dongarra, D. Laforenza, and S. Orlando, eds., vol. 2840 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, 2003, Springer, pp. 10-14.
9. K. M. Jansons and G. D. Lythe, Efficient numerical solution of stochastic differential equations using exponential timestepping, J. Statist. Phys., 100 (2000), pp. 1097-1109.
10. K. M. Jansons and G. D. Lythe, Exponential timestepping with boundary test for stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2003), pp. 1809-1822.
11. M. H. Kalos and P. A. Whitlock, Monte Carlo methods: Volume I: Basics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986.
12. I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, vol. 113 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, second ed., 1991.
13. D. E. Keyes, How scalable is domain decomposition in practice?, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Domain Decomposition Methods, C.-H. Lai, P. E. Bjørstad, M. Cross, and O. B. Widlund, eds., DDM. org, 1999, pp. 286-297.
14. H. Niederreiter, Random number generation and quasi Monte-Carlo methods, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1992.
15. A. Quarteroni and A. Valli, Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Oxford University Press, 1999.
16. A. Toselli and O. B. Widlund, Domain Decomposition Methods-Algorithms and Theory, vol. 34 of Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer, 2005.