Which physicians have access to electronic prescribing and which ones end up using it?

Health Policy

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 288-294

  Pagán, José A ^a,b   Pratt, William R ^a   Sun, Jun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PAN AMERICAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic prescribing; Information technology; Medication errors

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICATION ERRORS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 60849127575     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Lapointe L., and Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. Canadian Medical Association Journal 174 11 (2006) 1573-1578
2. eHealth Initiative. Electronic prescribing: toward maximum value and rapid adoption, executive summary; 2004 [http://ehr.medigent.com/assets/collaborate/2004/04/14/eHealth%20Initiative%20Electronic%20Prescribing%20Report%2004.14.04%20Executive%20Summary.pdf; 2007].
3. Bates D.W., Teich J.M., Lee J., Seger D., Kuperman G.J., Ma'Luf N., et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Association 280 15 (1998) 1311-1316
4. Shields A.E., Shin P., Leu M.G., Levy D.E., Betancourt R.M., Hawkings D., et al. Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: results of a national survey. Health Affairs 6 5 (2007) 1373-1383
5. Center for Studying Health System Change. Growing availability of clinical information technology in physician practices, data bulletin no. 31. Washington; 2006.
6. Institute of Medicine: Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors, Preventing medication errors. Quality Chasm Series. Washington; 2007.
7. Center for Studying Health System Change. Limited information technology for patient care in physician offices, issue brief no. 89. Washington; 2004.
8. Center for Studying Health System Change. Community Tracking Study Physician Survey 2004-2005, user guide. Ann Arbor; 2006.
9. Pauly M.V., and Pagán J.A. Spillovers and vulnerability: the case of community uninsurance. Health Affairs 26 5 (2007) 1304-1314
10. Pagán J.A., Balasubramanian L., and Pauly M.V. Physicians' career satisfaction, quality of care and patients' trust: the role of community uninsurance. Health Economics, Policy and Law 2 4 (2007) 347-362
11. McCarty J.A., and Hastak M. Segmentation approaches in data-mining: a comparison of RFM, CHAID, and logistic regression. Journal of Business Research 60 6 (2007) 656-662
12. Boslaugh S.E., Kreuter M.W., Nicholson R.A., and Naleid K. Comparing demographic, health status and psychosocial strategies to audience segmentation to promote physical activity. Health Education Research 20 4 (2005) 430-438
13. Sullivan D.J., and van Zyl M.A. The well-being of children in foster care: exploring physical and mental health needs. Children and Youth Review 30 7 (2008) 774-786
14. Wang J.W., Middleton B., Prosser L.A., Bardon C.G., Spurr C.D., Carchidi P.J., et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. The American Journal of Medicine 114 5 (2003) 397-403
15. Institute of Medicine, Preventing medication errors; 2007.