An application of linear mixed effects model to assess the agreement between two methods with replicated observations

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 150-173

  Roy, Anuradha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment of agreement; Kronecker product covariance structure; Linear mixed effects model; Proc Mixed; Replicated observations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FLOWMETER; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING;

ALGORITHMS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS;

EID: 60849118961     PISSN: 10543406     EISSN: 15205711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10543400802535141     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Argall, J. A. W., Wright, N., Mackway-Jones, K., Jackson, R. (2003). A comparison of two commonly used methods of weight estimation. Archives of Disease in Childhood 88:789-790
2. Barnhart, H. X., Song, J., Haber, M. J. (2005). Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings. Stat. Med. 24:1371-1384.
3. Barnhart, H. X., Haber, M. J., Lin, L. I. (2007). An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17:529-569.
4. Bartko, J. J. (1994). Measures of agreement: a single procedure. Stat. Med. 13:737-745.
5. Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G. (1983). Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307-17.
6. Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 8:307-310.
7. Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G. (1990). A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput. Biol. Med. 20(5):337-340.
8. Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8:135-160.
9. Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G. (2007). Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17:571-582.
10. Boik, J. B. (1991). Scheffe's mixed model for multivariate repeated measures: a relative efficiency evaluation. Commun. Statist - Theory Meth. 20:1233-1255.
11. Bowling, L. S., Sageman, W. S., O'Connor, S. M., Cole, R., Amundson, D. E. (1993). Lack of agreement between measurement of ejection fraction by impedance cardiography versus radionuclide ventriculography. Crit. Care Med. 21:1523-1527.
12. Chaganty, N. R., Naik, D. N. (2002). Analysis of multivariate longitudinal data using quasileast squares. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 103:421-436.
13. Chen, M. L. (1997). Individual bioequivalence - a regulatory update. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 7:5-11.
14. Choudhary, P. K. (2007). Semiparametric regression for assessing agreement using tolerance bands. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51:6229-6241.
15. Choudhary, P. K. (2008). A tolerance interval approach for assessment of agreement in method comparison studies with repeated measurements. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138:1102-1115.
16. Choudhary, P. K., Nagaraja, H. N. (2005). Assessment of agreement using intersection-union principle. Biometrical Journal 47(5):674-681.
17. Choudhary, P. K., Ng, H. K. T. (2006). Assessment of agreement under non-standard conditions using regression models for mean and variance. Biometrics 62:288-296.
18. Choudhary, P. K., Nagaraja, H. N. (2007). Tests for assessment of agreement using probability criteria. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137:279-290.
19. Galecki, A. T. (1994). General class of covariance structures for two or more repeated factors in longitudinal data analysis. Commun. Statist - Theory Meth. 22:3105-3120.
20. Haber, M., Barnhart, H. X., Song, J., Gruden J. (2005). Observer variability: a new approach in evaluating interobserver agreement. Journal of Data Science 3:69-83.
21. Hamlett, A., Ryan, L., Serrano-Trespalacios, P., Wolfinger, R. (2003). Mixed models for assessing correlation in the presence of replication. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 53:442-450.
22. Hamlett, A., Ryan, L., Wolfinge, R. (2004). On the use of PROC MIXED to estimate correlation in the presence of repeated measures. SAS Users Group International, Proceedings of the Statistics and Data Analysis Section 198-229:1-7.
23. Kenward, M. G., Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983-997.
24. Lam, M., Webb, K. A., O'Donnell, D. E. (1999). Correlation between two variables in repeated measures. American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Biometric Section 213-218.
25. Laird, N. M., Ware, J. H. (1982). Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963-974.
26. Lee, J., Koh, D., Ong, C. N. (1989). Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Comput. Biol. Med. 19(1):61-70.
27. Lin, L. K. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255-268.
28. Lin, L. I., Hedayat, A. S., Sinha, B., Yang, M. (2002). Statistical methods in assessing agreement: models, issues and tools. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97:257-270.
29. Naik, D. N., Rao, S. S. (2001). Analysis of multivariate repeated measures data with a kronecker product structured covariance matrix. Journal of Applied Statistics 28(1):91-105.
30. Quiroz, J. (2005). Assessment of equivalence using a concordance correlation coefficient in a repeated measurements design. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 15:913-928.
31. Roy, A. (2006). Estimating correlation coefficient between two variables with repeated observations using mixed effects model. Biometrical Journal 48:286-301.
32. Roy, A., Khattree, R. (2007). Classification rules for repeated measures data from biomedical research. In: Khattree, R., Naik, D. N., eds. Computational Methods in Biomedical Research. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall, pp. 323-370.
33. SAS Institute, Inc. (2004). SAS/STAT User's Guide Version 9. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
34. Shults, J., Morrow, A. L. (2002). The use of quasi-least squares to adjust for two levels of correlation. Biometrics 58:521-530.
35. Shults, J., Whitt, M. C., Kumanyika, S. (2004). Analysis of data with multiple sources of correlation in the framework of generalized estimating equations. Statistics in Medicine 23:3209-3226.
36. St. Laurent, R. T. (1998). Evaluating agreement with a gold standard in method comparison studies. Biometrics 54:537-545.
37. Timm, N. H. (2002). Applied Multivariate Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Timm, N. H., Mieczkowski, T. A. (1997). Univariate & Multivariate General Linear Models: Theory and Applications Using SAS Software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
39. Westfall, P. H., Tobias, R. D., Rom, D., Wolfinger, R. D., Hochberg, Y. (1999). Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.