Assessment of agreement using intersection-union principle

Biometrical Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 674-681

  Choudhary, Pankaj K ^a   Nagaraja, H N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agreement measures; Concordance correlation; Coverage probability; Equivalence; Total deviation index

Indexed keywords

AGREEMENT MEASURE; BIVARIATE DATUM; CONCORDANCE CORRELATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; COVERAGE PROBABILITIES; EQUIVALENCE; TOTAL DEVIATION INDEX; TOTAL DEVIATIONS;

EID: 27844521357     PISSN: 03233847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200410068     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Atkinson, G. and Nevill, A. (1997). Comment on the use of concordance correlation to assess the agreement between two variables. Biometrics 53, 775-777.
2. Bauer, P. and Bauer, M. M. (1994). Testing equivalence simultaneously for location and dispersion of two normally distributed populations. Biometrical Journal 6, 643-660.
3. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i, 307-310.
4. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. (1990). A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Computers in Biology and Medicine 20, 337-340.
5. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8, 135-160.
6. Brown, L. D., Hwang, J. T. G., and Munk, A. (1997). An unbiased test for the bioequivalence problem. Annals of Statistics 25, 2345-2367.
7. Casella, G. and Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical Inference, 2nd edn. Duxbury, Pacific Grove.
8. Choudhary, P. K. and Nagaraja, H. N. (2004a). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies - A review. In Advances in Ranking and Selection, Multiple Comparisons, and Reliability, Balakrishnan, N., Kannan, N. and Nagaraja, H. N. (Editors), Birkhauser, Boston, in press.
9. Choudhary, P. K. and Nagaraja, H. N. (2004b). Assessing agreement between two instruments using intersectionunion tests. Technical Report 732. The Ohio State University. Columbus, OH, USA.
10. Dunn, G. and Roberts, C. (1999). Modelling method comparison data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8, 161-179.
11. FDA (2001). Guidance for Industry: Statistical approaches to establishing bioequivalence.
12. Fleiss, J. L. (1986). The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. John Wiley, New York.
13. Hawkins, D. M. (2002). Diagnostics for conformity of paired quantitative measurements. Statistics in Medicine 21, 1913-1935.
14. Hsu. J. C., Hwang, J. T. G., Liu, H., and Ruberg, S. J. (1994). Confidence intervals associated with tests for bioequivalence. Biometrika 81, 103-114.
15. Lehmann, E. L. (1986). Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
16. Lin, L. I. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255-268.
17. Biometrics 2000, 56, 324-325.
18. Lin, L. I. (1992). Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 48, 599-604.
19. Lin, L. I. (2000). Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. Statistics in Medicine 19, 255-270.
20. Lin, L. I. and Chinchilli, V. (1997). Rejoinder to the letter to the editor from Atkinson and Nevill. Biometrics 53, 777-778.
21. Lin, L. I., Hedayat, A. S., Sinha, B., and Yang, M. (2002). Statistical methods in assessing agreement: Models, issues, and tools. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97, 257-270.
22. Nickerson, C. A. (1997). Comment on "A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility". Biometrics 53, 1503-1507.
23. St. Laurent, R. T. (1998). Evaluating agreement with a gold standard in method comparison studies. Biometrics 54, 537-545.
24. Wang, W. (1999). On equivalence of two variances of a bivariate normal vector. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 81, 279-292.