Defining disability: Effects of disability concepts on research outcomes

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-18

  Gronvik, Lars ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849106660     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570701621977     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Altaian, B.M. (1986). Definitions of disability in empirical research: Is the use of an administrative definition co-opting the results of disability research? Paper presented at the Annal Meetings of American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
2. Altaian, B.M. (2001a). Definitions of disability and their operationalization, and measurement in survey data: An update. In S.N. Barnartt & B.M. Altman (Eds.), Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: Where we are and where we need to go, Vol. 2, (pp. 77-100). Oxford: Elsevier.
3. Altman, B.M. (2001b). Disability definitions, models, classification, schemes, and applications. In G.L. Albrecht, K.D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 97-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Aspinall, PJ. (2001). Operationalising the collection of ethnicity data in studies of the sociology of health and illness. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23, 829-862.
5. Atkinson, A.B., & Brandolini, A. (2001). Promise and pitfalls in the use of 'secondary' datasets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(3), 771-799.
6. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (Eds.). (2004). Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research. Leeds: Disability Press.
7. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work Employment Society, 19(3), 527-545.
8. Barren, K. (2001). Autonomy in everyday life, for whom? Disability & Society, 16(3), 431-447.
9. Barron, K., Michailakis, D., & Söder, M. (2000). Funktionshindrade och den offentliga hjälpapparaten [People with disabilitites and the public support system]. In M. Szebehely (Ed.), Välfärd, vård och omsorg [Welfare, nursing and care]SOU 2000: 38 (pp. 137-170). Stockholm: Fritzes.
10. Bickenbach, J.E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E.M., & Üstün, T.B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1173-1187.
11. Hide, A.H., van Rooy, G., & Loeb, M.E. (2003). Living conditions among people with activity limitations in Namibia. A representative, national survey (no. STF78 A034503). Oslo: SINTEF Unimed.
12. Eurostat. (2001). Disability and social participation in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
13. Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
14. Fredäng, P. (2003). Teckenspråkiga döva: Identitetsförändringar i del svenska dövsamhället [Deaf sign language users. Identity changes in the Swedish deaf community]. Stehag: Förlags ab Gondolin.
15. Fujiura, G.T., & Rutkowski-Kmitta, V. (2001). Counting disability. In G.L. Albrecht, K.D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 69-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Gross, B.H., & Hahn, H. (2004). Developing issues in the classification of mental and physical disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15(3), 130-134.
17. Gynnerstedt, K. (Ed.). (2004). Personlig assistans och medborgarskap [Personal assistance and citizenship]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
18. Haber, L.D. (1967). Identifying the disabled: Concepts and methods in the measurement of disability. Social Security Bulletin, 30, 17-34.
19. Haber, L.D. (1971). Disabling effects of chronic disease and impairment. Journal of Chronical Disability, 24, 469-487.
20. Hahn, H., & Pool Hegamin, A. (2001). Assessing scientific measures of disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(2), 114-121.
21. Hedlund, M. (2000). Disability as a phenomenon: A discourse of social and biological understanding. Disability & Society, 15(5), 765-780.
22. Hedlund, M. (2004). Shaping justice. Defining the disability category in Swedish social policy. Lund: Lund University.
23. Hugemark, A. (2006). Åter i stöpsleven: Personlig assistans mellan marknad och reglering [Back in the melting-pot. Personal assistance between market and regulation]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrifl, 13(4), 313-330.
24. Ingstad, B., & Reynolds Whyte, S. (1995). Disability and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. Kaye, S. (1997). Disability watch. The status of people with disabilities in the United States. Volcano, CA: Volcano Press and Disability Rights Advocates.
26. Kaye, S. (2001). Disability watch. The status of people with disabilities in the United States (Vol. 2). Oakland, CA: Disability Rights Advocates.
27. Kiecolt, K.J., & Nathan, L.E. (1985). Secondary analysis of survey data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. LaPlante, M. (1990). Who counts as having a disability? Musings on the meaning and the prevalence of disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 15-17.
29. Martin, J., Meltzer, H., & Elliot, I). (1988). The prevalence of disability among adults. London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys.
30. Mashaw, J.L., & Reno, V.P. (2001). Balancing security and opportunity: The challenge of disability income policy. Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance.
31. Mathiowetz, N. A. (2001). Methodological issues in the measurement of persons with disabilities. In S.N. Barnartt & B.M. Altaian (Eds.), Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: Where we are and where we need to go (Vol. 2, pp. 125-143). Oxford: Elsevier.
32. McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory. Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.
33. Nagi, S.Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In M.B. Sussman (Ed.), Sociology and rehabilitation (pp. 100-113). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
34. Nagi, S.Z. (1976). An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Health and Society, 54, 439-467.
35. Nagi, S.Z. (1979). The concept and measurement of disability. In E.D. Berkowitz (Ed.), Disability policies and government programs (pp. 1-15). New York: Praeger.
36. National Board of Health and Welfare. (1997). Handikappreformen. Slutrapport [The disability reform. Final report]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
37. National Board of Health and Welfare. (2004). Statistics - LSS. Persons with certain functional impairments - measures specified by LSS 2003. Socialtjänst (Vol. 2). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
38. National Social Insurance Board. (2002). Social insurance in Sweden 2002. Meals and reality in disability policy. Stockholm: National Social Insurance Agency.
39. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
40. Oliver, M. (1996a). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 18-42). Harlow: Longmore.
41. Oliver, M. (1996b). Understanding disability. From theory to practice. New York: St. Martin's Press.
42. Oliver, M. (2004). The social model in action: If I had a hammer. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 18-31). Leeds: Disability Press.
43. Priestley, M. (2000). Adults only: Disability, social policy and the life course. Journal of Social Policy, 29(3), 421-439.
44. Shakespeare, T. (2005a). Nordic disability research: Reflections, not conclusions. In A. Gustavsson, J. Sandvin, R. Traustadóttir, & J. Tøssebro (Eds.), Resistance, reflection and change (pp. 295-302). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
45. Shakespeare, T. (2005b). Review article: Disability studies today and tomorrow. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(1), 138-148.
46. Shelton Reed, J. (1975-1976). Needles in haystacks: Studying 'rare' populations by secondary analysis of national sample surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(4), 514-522.
47. Skogman Thoursie, P. (2004). Occupational attainment and earnings: The case of the disabled. Labour, 18(3), 415-442.
48. Statistics Sweden. (1992). Handicapped people 1975-1989. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
49. Statistics Sweden. (1997). Välfärd och ojämlikhet i 20-ålrsperspektiv [Living conditions and inequality in Sweden - a 20-year perspective] 1975-1995 (report no. 91). Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
50. Statistics Sweden. (2001). National living level survey (ULF). Questionnaire 2001: 2. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
51. Statistics Sweden. (2003). Disabled people 1988-1999. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
52. Statistics Sweden. (2005). Funktionshindrades situation på arbetsmarknaden. 4:e kvartalet [Labour market situation for disabled persons - 4th quarter 2004]. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
53. Stone, D.A. (1985). The disabled state. London: Macmillan.
54. Swedish Research Institute for Disability Policy [HANDU AB]. (2005). Levnadsnivåundersökning 2005. En rapport om levnadsnivån för rörelsehindrade, hörselskadade, döva och svnskadade personer [Living condition survey 2005]. Stockholm: HANDU AB.
55. Szebehely, M., Fritzell, J., & Lundberg, O. (2001). Funktionshinder och välfärd. SOU 2001: 56[Disability and welfare]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
56. Tepper, S., Sutton, J., Beatty, P., & DeJong, G. (1997). Alternative definitions of disability: Relationship to health-care expenditures. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(12), 556-558.
57. T0ssebro, J., & Kittelsaa, A. (2004). Studying the living conditions of disabled people: Approaches and problems. In J. Tøssebro & A. Kittelsaa (Eds.), Exploring the living conditions of disabled people (pp. 17-43). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
58. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1975). Fundamental principles of disability. London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
59. United Nations. (1990). Disability statistics compendium. New York: United Nations.
60. United Nations. (1996). Manual for development of statistical information for disability programmes and policies. New York: United Nations.
61. United Nations. (2003). The collection and dissemination of statistics on disability at the United Nations Statistics Division: Proposals for the future. New York: The Social and Housing Statistics Section, United Nations Statistics Division.
62. Upshur, C.C., Benson, P.R., Clemens, E., Fisher, W.H., Leff, U.S., & Schutt, R. (1997). Closing state mental hospitals in Massachusetts: Policy, process, and impact. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20(2), 199-217.
63. Üstün, B.T., Chatterji, S., Bickenbach, J.E., Trotter, R.T., II, Room, R., Rehm, J., et al. (Eds.). (2001). Disability and culture. Universalistn and diversity. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
64. Wilson, D.J. (2004). Fighting polio like a man. Intersections of masculinity, disability and aging. In B.G. Smith & B. Hutchison (Eds.), Gendering disability (pp. 119-133). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
65. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
66. Wright, E., Avirappattu, G., & Lafuze, J. (1999). The family experience of deinstitutionalization: Insights from the closing of Central State Hospital. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 26(3), 289-304.