Individual differences in the ability to fake on personality measures

Human Performance

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 86-103

  Raymark, Patrick H ^a   Tafero, Tracey L ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849103802     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08959280802541039     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
2. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
3. Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1988). On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 663-678.
4. Cacioppo, J. X., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197-253.
5. Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., Johnston, N. G., & Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 847-860.
6. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
7. Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Kay, G. G. (1995). Persons, places, and personality: Career assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 3(2), 123-139.
8. Cunningham, M. R., Wong, D. T., & Barbee, A. P. (1994). Self-presentation dynamics on overt integrity tests: Experimental studies of the Reid Report. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 643-658.
9. Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
10. Dwight, S. A., & Alliger, G. M. (1997). Using response latencies to identify overt integrity test dissimulation. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
11. Edwards, J. R. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 36, 1577-1613.
12. Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Hough, L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 155-166.
13. Frei, R. L. (1997). Fake this test! Do you have the ability to raise your score on a service orientation inventory? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio.
14. Furnham, A. (1990). Faking personality questionnaires: Fabricating different profiles for different purposes. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 9(1), 46-55.
15. Hayes, T., Roehm, H. A., & Castellano, J. P. (1994). Personality correlates of success in total quality manufacturing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8(4), 397-411.
16. Holden, R. R., & Jackson, D. N. (1981). Subtlety, information, and faking effects in personality assessment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 379-388.
17. Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11, 209-244.
18. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 581-595.
19. Hough, L. M., & Ones, D. S. (2002). The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, M. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Mahar, D., Cologon, J., & Duck, J. (1995). Response strategies when faking personality questionnaires in a vocational selection setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(5), 605-609.
21. Maxwell, S. E. (2000). Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychological Methods, 5, 434-458.
22. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, R T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
23. McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 812-821.
24. Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N., & Trapnell, P. D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(2), 100-108.
25. Raymark, P. H., Schmit, M. J., & Guion, R. M. (1997). Identifying potentially useful personality constructs for employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 723-736.
26. Raymark, P. H., Shilobod, T. L., & Steffensmeier, J. (2004). An examination of job-relevant pattern faking. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
27. Rosse, J.G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 634-644.
28. Smith, D. B., & Ellingson, J. E. (2002). Substance versus style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 211-219.
29. Snell, A. F., & McDaniel, M. A. (1998). Faking: Getting data to answer the right questions. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
30. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.
31. Snyder, M., & Tanke, E. D. (1976). Behavior and attitude: Some people are more consistent than others. Journal of Personality, 44, 501-517.
32. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
33. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1994). Meta-analysis of personality job performance relations-A reply to Ones, Mount, Barrick & Hunter (1994), Personnel Psychology, 47, 157-172.
34. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1999). Meta-analysis of bidirectional relations in personality-job performance research. Human Performance, 12, 1-29.
35. Tisak, J., & Smith, C. S. (1994). Defending and extending difference score methods. Journal of Management, 20, 675-682.
36. Tobacyk, J. J., Driggers, E. C., & Hourcade, J. (1991). Self-monitoring and psychological type: A social cognitive information processing model. Journal of Psychological Type, 22, 33-38.
37. Tunnel, G. (1980). Intraindividual consistency in personality assessment: The effect of self-monitoring. Journal of Personality, 48, 220-232.
38. Turnbull, G. J. (1992). A review of military pilot selection. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 63, 825-830.
39. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., & Roth, P. L. (2005). Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: Construct-related validity and susceptibility to response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 536-552.
40. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 197-210.
41. Zickar, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Detecting faking on a personality instrument using appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 71-87.