Parameter estimation/sensitivity analysis for an aquifer test with skin effect

Ground Water

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 287-299

  Chen, Yen Ju ^a   Yeh, Hund Der ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER PARAMETERS; AQUIFER TESTS; AQUIFER ZONES; COMPOSITE ANALYSIS; DIFFUSIVITIES; FINITE-THICKNESS SKINS; GROUND WATER FLOWS; MATHEMATICAL TREATMENTS; OBSERVATION WELLS; SKIN THICKNESS; TRANSMISSIVITY; WELL BORES; WELLBORE FLOWS;

AQUIFERS; BORING; ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS; FLOW RATE; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; OIL FIELD EQUIPMENT; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATED ANNEALING; SKIN; TESTING; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER WELLS;

DATA FLOW ANALYSIS;

AQUIFER; DIFFUSIVITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TESTING METHOD;

ARTICLE; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 60849102196     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00530.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aarts, E., and J. Korst. 1989. Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines: A Stochastic Approach to Combinatorial Optimization and Neural Computing. New York : John Wiley and Sons.
2. Chang, Y.C., H.D. Yeh, and Y.C. Huang. 2008. Determination of the parameter pattern and values for a one-dimensional multi-zone unconfined aquifer. Hydrogeology Journal 16, no. 2 : 205 214, doi:10.1007/s10040-007-0228- 3.
3. Chen, C.S., and C.C. Chang. 2003. Well hydraulics theory and data analysis of the constant-head test in an unconfined aquifer with the skin effect. Water Resources Research 39, no. 5 : 1121, doi:10.1029/2002WR001516.
4. Cooper, H.H., and C.E. Jacob. 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 27, no. 4 : 526 534.
5. Corana, A., M. Marchesi, C. Martini, and S. Ridella. 1987. Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the "simulated annealing" algorithm. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 13, no. 3 : 262 280.
6. Cunha, M.D.C., and J. Sousa. 1999. Water distribution network design optimization: Simulated annealing approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 125, no. 4 : 215 221.
7. Dougherty, D.E., and R.A. Marryott. 1991. Optimal groundwater management. 1. Simulated annealing. Water Resources Research 27, no. 10 : 2493 2508.
8. Hantush, M.S. 1964. Hydraulics of wells. In Advances in Hydroscience, vol. 1, ed. V.T. Chow, 281 442. New York : Academic Press.
9. Hiller, C.K., and B.S. Levy. 1994. Estimation of aquifer diffusivity from analysis of constant-head pumping test data. Ground Water 32, no. 1 : 47 52.
10. Huang, Y.C., and H.D. Yeh. 2007. The use of sensitivity analysis in on-line aquifer parameter estimation. Journal of Hydrology 335, no. 3-4 : 406 418.
11. IMSL. 2003a. IMSL Fortran Library User's Guide Math/Library Volume 2 of 2, version 5.0. Houston, Texas : Visual Numerics.
12. IMSL. 2003b. IMSL Fortran Library User's Guide Stat/Library Volume 2 of 2, version 5.0. Houston, Texas : Visual Numerics.
13. Jacob, C.E., and S.W. Lohman. 1952. Nonsteady flow to a well of constant drawdown in an extensive aquifer. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 33, no. 4 : 559 569.
14. Jiao, J.J., and K.R. Rushton. 1995. Sensitivity of drawdown to parameters and its influence on parameter estimation for pumping tests in large-diameter wells. Ground Water 33, no. 5 : 794 800.
15. Kabala, Z.J. 2001. Sensitivity analysis of a pumping test on a well with wellbore storage and skin. Advances in Water Resources 24, no. 5 : 483 504.
16. Kirkpatrick, S., C.D. Gelatt Jr., and M.P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, no. 4598 : 671 680.
17. Kuo, S.F., C.W. Liu, and G.P. Merkley. 2001. Application of the simulated annealing method to agricultural water resource management. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 80, no. 1 : 109 124.
18. Leng, C.H., and H.D. Yeh. 2003. Aquifer parameter identification using the extended Kalman filter. Water Resources Research 39, no. 3 : 1062, doi:10.1029/2001WR000840.
19. Lin, Y.C., and H.D. Yeh. 2005. Trihalomethane species forecast using optimization method: Genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 19, no. 3 : 248 257.
20. Marryott, R.A., D.E. Dougherty, and R.L. Stollar. 1993. Optimal groundwater management. 2. Application of simulated annealing to a field-scale contamination site. Water Resources Research 29, no. 4 : 847 860.
21. McElwee, C.D., and M.A. Yukler. 1978. Sensitivity of groundwater models with respect to variations in transmissivity and storage. Water Resources Research 14, no. 3 : 451 459.
22. Metropolis, N., A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth, A.H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics 21, no. 6 : 1087 1092.
23. Mishra, S., and D. Guyonnet. 1992. Analysis of observation-well response during constant-head testing. Ground Water 30, no. 4 : 523 528.
24. Peng, H.Y., H.D. Yeh, and S.Y. Yang. 2002. Improved numerical evaluation for the radial groundwater flow equation. Advances in Water Resources 25, no. 6 : 663 675.
25. Theis, C.V. 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 16, no. 2 : 519 524.
26. Yang, S.Y., and H.D. Yeh. 2006. A novel analytical solution for constant-head test in a patchy aquifer. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 30, no. 12 : 1213 1230.
27. Yang, S.Y., and H.D. Yeh. 2005. Laplace-domain solutions for radial two-zone flow equations under the conditions of constant-head and partially penetrating well. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 131, no. 3 : 209 216.
28. Yang, S.Y., and H.D. Yeh. 2002. Solution for flow rates across the wellbore in a two-zone confined aquifer. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 128, no. 2 : 175 183.
29. Yeh, H.D. 1987. Theis' solution by nonlinear least-squares and finite-difference Newton's method. Ground Water 25, no. 6 : 710 715.
30. Yeh, H.D., and Y.C. Lin. 2008. Pipe network system analysis using simulated annealing. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - AQUA 57, no. 5 : 317 327.
31. Yeh, H.D., and Y.J. Chen. 2007. Determination of skin and aquifer parameters for a slug test with wellbore-skin effect. Journal of Hydrology 342, no. 3-4 : 283 294.
32. Yeh, H.D., T.H. Chang, and Y.C. Lin. 2007a. Groundwater contaminant source identification by a hybrid heuristic approach. Water Resources Research 43, no. 9 : W09420, doi:10.1029/2005WR004731.
33. Yeh, H.D., Y.C. Lin, and Y.C. Huang. 2007b. Parameter identification for leaky aquifers using global optimization methods. Hydrological Processes 21, no. 7 : 862 872.
34. Zheng, C., and P. Wang. 1996. Parameter structure identification using tabu search and simulated annealing. Advances in Water Resources 19, no. 4 : 215 224.