Determination of skin and aquifer parameters for a slug test with wellbore-skin effect

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 342, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 283-294

  Yeh, Hund Der ^a   Chen, Yen Ju ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Groundwater; Parameter estimation; Sensitivity analysis; Simulated annealing; Skin thickness; Slug test

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

SKIN THICKNESS; SLUG TEST;

AQUIFERS;

AQUIFERS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

ANNEALING; AQUIFER; ESTIMATION METHOD; GRAPHICAL METHOD; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; NUMERICAL METHOD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SKIN EFFECT; SLUG TEST;

EID: 34547102282     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.029     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bouwer H., and Rice R.C. A slug test method for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 12 3 (1976) 423-428
2. Butler Jr. J.J. The Design Performance and Analysis of Slug Tests (1998), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton 252pp
3. Cooper H.H., Bredehoeft J.D., and Papadopulos I.S. Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour. Res. 3 1 (1967) 263-269
4. Corana A., Marchesi M., Martini C., and Ridella S. Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the simulated annealing algorithm. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 13 3 (1987) 262-280
5. Cunha M.D.C., and Sousa J. Water distribution network design optimization: simulated annealing approach. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. ASCE 125 4 (1999) 215-221
6. Dougherty D.E., and Marryott R.A. Optimal groundwater management 1. Simulated Annealing. Water Resour. Res. 27 10 (1991) 2493-2508
7. Duffield G.M. AQTESOLV for Windows User's Guide (2002), HydroSOLVE, Inc., Reston, VA
8. Faust C.R., and Mercer J.W. Evaluation of slug tests in wells containing a finite-thickness skin. Water Resour. Res. 20 4 (1984) 504-506
9. Freeze R.A., and Cherry J.A. Groundwater (1979), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey p. 29
10. Hvorslev, M.J., 1951. Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bull. No. 36, Waterways Experimental Station Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, MI, pp. 1-50.
11. Hyder Z., Butler Jr. J.J., McElwee C.D., and Liu W.Z. Slug tests in partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 30 11 (1994) 2945-2957
12. IMSL, 1997. Stat/Library. Volume 2, Visual Numerics, Inc, Houston, TX.
13. Kabala Z.J. Sensitivity analysis of a pumping test on a well with wellbore storage and skin. Adv. Water Res. 24 5 (2001) 483-504
14. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt Jr. C.D., and Vecchi M.P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220 4598 (1983) 671-680
15. Kuo S.F., Liu C.W., and Merkley G.P. Application of the simulated annealing method to agricultural water resource management. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 80 1 (2001) 109-124
16. Marryott R.A., Dougherty D.E., and Stollar R.L. Optimal groundwater management 2. Application of simulated annealing to a field-scale contamination site. Water Resour. Res. 29 4 (1993) 847-860
17. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H., and Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21 6 (1953) 1087-1092
18. Moench, A.F., Hsieh, P.A., 1985. Analysis of slug test data in a well with finite-thickness skin. In: Memoirs of the 17th International Congress on the Hydrogeology of Rocks of Low Permeability, U.S.A. Members of the International Association of Hydrologists, Tucson, AZ, vol. 17, pp. 17-29.
19. Pardo-Iguzquiza E. Optimal selection of number and location of rainfall gauges for areal rainfall estimation using geostatistics and simulated annealing. J. Hydrol. 210 (1998) 206-220
20. Pham D.T., and Karaboga D. Intelligent Optimisation Techniques (2000), Springer, Great Britain
21. Ramey Jr. H.J., Agarwal R.G., and Martin I. Analysis of "Slug Test" or DST flow period data. J. Can. Petrol Technol. 14 3 (1975) 37-47
22. Rovey II C.W. Digital simulation of the scale effect in hydraulic conductivity. Hydrogeol. J. 6 (1998) 216-225
23. Schwartz F.W., and Zhang H. Fundamentals of Ground Water (2003), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York p. 73
24. Springer, R.K., Gelhar L.W., 1991. Characterization of large-scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response. Cape Cod, MA, U.S. Geological Survey Water Reserch Investigation Report 91 (4034), pp. 36-40.
25. Yang Y.J., and Gates T.M. Wellbore skin effect in slug-test data analysis for low-permeability geologic materials. Ground Water 35 6 (1997) 931-937
26. Yeh H.D. Theis' solution by nonlinear least-squares and finite- difference Newton's method. Ground Water 25 6 (1987) 710-715
27. Yeh H.D., and Yang S.Y. A novel analytical solution for a slug test conducted in a well with a finite-thickness skin. Adv. Water Resour. 29 10 (2006) 1479-1489
28. Zheng C., and Wang P. Parameter structure identification using tabu search and simulated annealing. Adv. Water Resour. 19 4 (1996) 215-224