Recipient design in tacit communication

Cognition

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 46-54

  Newman Norlund, Sarah E ^a   Noordzij, Matthijs L ^a,c   Newman Norlund, Roger D ^a   Volman, Inge A C ^a   Ruiter, Jan Peter de ^b   Hagoort, Peter ^a,b   Toni, Ivan ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Audience design; Empathy; Motherese; Nonverbal; Social game

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPATHY; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PERSONALITY; PLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60849098720     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bargh J.A., Chen M., and Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype priming on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 230-244
2. Baron-Cohen S., and Wheelwright S. The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34 (2004) 163-175
3. Barr D.J. Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary?. Cognitive Science 28 (2004) 937-962
4. Brand R.J., Baldwin D.A., and Ashburn L.A. Evidence from 'motionese': Modification in mothers' infant-directed action. Developmental Science 5 1 (2002) 72-83
5. Brodsky, P., Waterfall, H., Edelman, S. (2007). Characterizing Motherese: on the computational structure of child-directed language, in Proc. Cognitive Science Society Conference.
6. Brown-Schmidt S., Gunlogson C., and Tanenhaus M.K. Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition 107 3 (2008) 1123-1134
7. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., and Kao C.F. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment 48 (1984) 306-307
8. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J.A., Blain W., and Jarvis G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 2 (1996) 197-253
9. Clark H.H., and Carlson T.B. Hearers and speech acts. Language 58 (1982) 332-373
10. Clark H.H. Using language (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11. De Ruiter J.P., Noordzij M., Newman-Norlund S., Hagoort P., and Toni I. On the origin of intentions. In: Haggard P., Rossetti Y., and Kawato M. (Eds). Attention and Performance XXII: Sensorimotor foundation of higher cognition (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford 593-610
12. Epley N., and Gilovich T. The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic. Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science 17 4 (2006) 311-318
13. Evans C.J., Kirby J.R., and Fabrigar L.R. Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 73 (2003) 507-528
14. Focquaert F., Steven M.S., Wolford G.L., Colden A., and Gazzaniga M.S. Empathizing and systemizing cognitive traits in the sciences and humanities. Personality and Individual Differences 43 (2007) 619-625
15. Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology (1967), Prentice Hall
16. Grice P. Utterer's meaning and intention. The Philosophical Review 78 (1969) 147-177
17. Grieser D.L., and Kuhl P.K. Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language; Support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology 24 (1988) 14-20
18. Holler J., and Stevens R. The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26 (2007) 4-27
19. Horton W.S., and Keysar B. When do speakers take into account common ground?. Cognition 59 (1996) 91-117
20. Horton W.S., and Gerrig R.J. The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition 96 (2005) 127-142
21. Isaacs E.A., and Clark H.H. References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 (1987) 26-37
22. Jacobs N., and Garnham A. The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language 56 (2007) 291-303
23. Keysar B., Barr D.J., and Horton W.S. The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7 (1998) 46-50
24. Krauss R.M., and Fussell S.R. Perspective-taking in Communication: Representation of other's knowledge in reference. Social Cognition 9 (1991) 2-24
25. Levinson S.C. On the human "interactional engine". In: Enfield N.J., and Levinson S.C. (Eds). Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction (2006), Oxford, Berg
26. Nadig A., and Sedivy J. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13 4 (2002) 329-336
27. O'Neill M., Bard K.A., Linnell M., and Fluck F. Maternal gesture with 20-month-old infants in two contexts. Developmental Science 8 4 (2005) 352-359
28. Ozyurek A. Do speakers design their cospeech gesture for their addressees? The effects of addressee location on representational gestures. Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2002) 688-704
29. Ruiter R.A.C., Verplanken B., De Kremer D., and Kok G. Danger and fear control in response to fear appeals: The role of need for cognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 26 1 (2004) 13-24
30. Saxe R., and Baron-Cohen S. Editorial: The neuroscience of theory of mind. Social Neuroscience 1 (2006) 1-9
31. Shintel H., and Keysar B. You said it before and you'll say it again: Expectations of consistency in communication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 33 (2007) 357-369
32. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1130
33. Warren-Leubecker A., and Bohannon III J.N. Intonation patterns in child-directed speech: Mother-Father differences. Child Development 55 (1984) 1379-1385
34. Wheelwright S., Baron-Cohen S., Goldenfeld N., Delaney J., Fine D., Smith R., et al. Predicting autism spectrum quotient (AQ) from the systemizing quotient-revised (SQ-R) and empathy quotient (eq). Brain Research 1079 (2006) 47-56