A new perspective on feasibility determination

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 273-280

  Szechtman, Roberto ^a   Ÿucesan, Enver ^b  

^a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

^b INSEAD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTICALLY OPTIMAL; MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS; OPTIMAL ALLOCATIONS; PERFORMANCE MEASURES; STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATIONS; STOCHASTIC SETTINGS; TIME BEHAVIORS;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS;

EID: 60749109819     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736078     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Andijani, A. A. 1998. A multi-criterion approach for kanban allocations. Omega 26:483-93.
2. Andradottir, S., D. Goldsman, and S.-H. Kim. 2005. Finding the best in the presence of stochastic constraints. In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, F. B. Armstrong, and J. A. Joines, 732-738. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
3. Batur, D., and S.-H. Kim. 2005. Finding the set of feasible systems when the number of systems or constraints is large. In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, F. B. Armstrong, and J. A. Joines, 692-698. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
4. Berger, J. O. 1985. Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Bernardo, J. M., and A. F. M. Smith. 1994. Bayesian theory. New York: Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.
6. Butler, J., D. J. Morrice, and P. W. Mullarkey. 2001. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Science 47:800-816.
7. Chen, H. C, C. H. Chen, and E. Yucesan. 2000. Computing efforts allocation for ordinal optimization and discrete event simulation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 45:960-964.
8. Chick, S., and K. Inoue. 2001. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Operations Research 49:1609-1624.
9. Dembo, A., and O. Zeitouni. 1998. Large deviations techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Dudewicz, E. J., and S. R. Dalal. 1975. Allocation of observations in ranking and selection with unequal variances. Sankhya B37:28-78.
11. Glynn, P., and S. Juneja. 2004. A large deviations perspective on ordinal optimization. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, ed. R. G. Ingalls, M. D. Rossetti, J. S. Smith, and B. A. Peters, 192-199. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
12. Gupta, S. S., and K. J. Miescke. 1996. Bayesian look ahead one-stage sampling allocations for selection of the best population. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 54:229-244.
13. Gupta, S. S., K. Nagel, and S. Panchapakesan. 1973. On the order statistics from equally correlated normal random variables. Biometrika 60:403-13.
14. Gupta, S. S., and S. Panchapakesan. 1979. Multiple decision procedures: Theory and methodology of selecting and ranking populations. New York: Wiley.
15. Hsu, J. C. 1996. Multiple comparisons: Theory and methods. New York: Chapman & Hall.
16. Kim, K., and D. Lin. 2001. Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (Series C) 49:1609-1624.
17. Kim, S.-H., and B. L. Nelson. 2006. Selecting the best: Theory and method. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, ed. S. G. Henderson and B. L. Nelson. Oxford: Elsevier.
18. Kushner, H. J., and G. G. Yin. 2003. Stochastic approximation and recursive algorithms and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Lee, L, H" E. P. Chew, and S. Tang. 2006, Integration of statistical selection with search mechanism for solving multì-objective simulation optimization problems. In Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. L. F. Perrone, F. P. Wieland, J. Liu, B. G. Lawson, D. M. Nicol, and R. M. Fujimoto, 294-303. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
20. Lee, L. H., E. P. Chew, and S. Tang. 2007. Finding the pareto set for multi-objective simulation models by minimization of expected opportunity cost. In Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. S. G. Henderson, B. Biller, M.-H. Hsieh, J. Shortle, J. D. Tew, and R. R. Barton, 513-521. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
21. Matejcik, F. J., and B. L. Nelson. 1995. Two-stage multiple comparisons with the best for computer simulation. Operations Research 43:633-640.
22. Nelson, B. L., and F. J. Matejcik. 1995. Using common random numbers for indifference-zone selection and multiple comparisons in simulation. Management Science 41:1935-1945.
23. Paulson, E. 1964. A sequential procedure for selecting the population with the largest mean from k normal populations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35:174-180.
24. Rinott, Y. 1978. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Communications in Statistics A7:799-811.