Reacting to rape: Exploring Mock Jurors' assessments of complainant credibility

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 202-219

  Ellison, Louise ^b   Munro, Vanessa E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60749106404     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: 14643529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azn077     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. ABBEY, A., COZZARELLI, C., MCLAUGHLIN, K. and HARNISH, R. (1987), 'The Effect of Clothing and Dyad Sex Composition on Perceptions of Sexual Intent: Do Women and Men Evaluate these Cues Differently?', Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17: 108-26.
2. ADLER, Z. (1987), Rape on Trial. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3. Amnesty International (2005), Sexual Assault Research: Summary Report, available online at www.amnesty.org.uk.
4. ANDERSON, I. and DOHERTY, K. (2008), Accounting for Rape: Psychology, Feminism and Discourse Analysis in the Study of Sexual Violence. London: Routledge.
5. ANDERSON, I., BEATTIE, G. and SPENCER, C. (2001), 'Can Blaming Victims Ever Be Logical? Attribution Theory and Discourse Analytic Perspectives', Human Relations, 54: 453-75.
6. ANDERSON, K., COOPER, H. and OKAMURA, L. (1997), 'Individual Differences and Attitudes towards Rape: A Meta-Analytic Review', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23: 295-315.
7. BELL, B. and LOFTUS, E. (1989), 'Trivial Persuasion in the Courtroom: The Power of (a Few) Minor Details', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 669-79.
8. BOESCHEN, L., SALES, B. and KOSS, M. (1998), 'Rape Trauma Experts in the Courtroom', Psychology Public Policy and Law, 4: 414-32.
9. BOLLINGMO, G., WESSEL, E., EILERTSEN, D. and MAGNUSSEN, S. (2008), 'Credibility of the Emotional Witness: A Study of Ratings by Police Investigators', Psychology, Crime and Law, 14: 29-40.
10. BONAZZOLI, M. (1998), Jury Selection and Bias: Debunking Invidious Stereotypes through Science', Quinnipiac Law Review, 18: 19-31.
11. BOWYER, L. and DALTON, M. (1997), 'Female Victims of Rape and their Genital Injuries', British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 104: 617-20.
12. BRERETON,D. (1997),'How Different Are Rape Trials? A Comparison of the Cross-Examination of Complainants in Rape and Assault Trials', British Journal of Criminology, 37: 242-61.
13. BREWER, N. and BURKE, A. (2002), 'Effects of Testimonial Inconsistencies and Eyewitness Confidence on Mock Juror Judgments', Law and Human Behaviour, 26: 353-64.
14. BRIGHT, D. and GOODMAN-DELAHUNTY, J. (2006), 'Gruesome Evidence and Emotion: Anger, Blame and Jury Decision-Making', Law and Human Behaviour, 30: 183-202.
15. BRONITT, S. (1998), 'The Rules of Recent Complaint: Rape Myths and the Legal Construction of the "Reasonable" Rape Victim', in P. Easteal, ed., Balancing the Scales: Rape, Law Reform and Australian Culture, 41-58. Sydney: Federation Press.
16. BROWN, J., HAMILTON, C. and O'NEILL, D. (2007), 'Characteristics Associated with Rape Attrition and the Role Played by Scepticism or Legal Rationality by Investigators and Prosecutors', Psychology, Crime and Law, 13: 355-70.
17. BUDDIE, A. and MILLER, A. (2002), 'Beyond Rape Myths: A More Complex View of Perceptions of Victims', Sex Roks, 45: 130-60.
18. BURGESS, A. and HOLMSTROM, L. (1974), 'Rape Trauma Syndrome', American Journal of Psychiatry, 131: 981-6.
19. BURT, M. and ALBIN, R. (1981), 'Rape Myths, Rape Definitions, and Probability of Conviction', Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11: 212-30.
20. CALHOUN, L., CANN, A., SELBY, J. and MAGEE, D. (1981), 'Victim Emotional Response: Effects on Social Reaction to Victims of Rape', British Journal of Social Psychology, 20: 17-21.
21. CALHOUN, L., SELBY, J., CANN, A. and KELLER, T. (1978), 'The Effects of Victim Physical Attractiveness and Sex of Respondent on Social Reactions to Victims of Rape', British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17: 191-2.
22. CLAY-WARNER, J. and BURT, C. (2005), 'Rape Reporting after Reforms: Have Times Really Changed?', Violence Against Women, 11: 150-76.
23. Council of HM Circuit Judges (2006), 'Convicting Rapist and Protecting Victim: A Consultation', Response of the council of HM Circuit Judges.
24. DAHL, J., ENEMO, I., DREVLAND, G., WESSEL, E., EILERTSEN, D. and MAGNUSSEN, S. (2007), 'Displayed Emotions and Witness Credibility: A Comparison of Judgments by Individuals and Mock Juries', Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21: 1145-55.
25. DU MONT, J. and WHITE, D. (2007), The Uses and Impacts of Medico-Legal Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: A Global Review. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
26. EHRLICH, S. (2001), Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
27. ELLISON, L. (2005), 'Closing the Credibility Gap: The Prosecutorial Use of Expert Witness Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases', International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 9: 239-68.
28. -(2007), 'Promoting Effective Case-building in Rape Cases: A Comparative Perspective', Criminal Law Review, 691-708.
29. ELLISON, L. and MUNRO, V. (forthcoming a), 'Of Normal Sex and Real Rape: Exploring the Use of Socio-Sexual Scripts in (Mock) Jury Deliberation', Social and Legal Studies.
30. -(forthcoming b), 'Getting to (Not) Guilty: Examining Jurors' Deliberative Processes and Legal Understanding in a Mock Rape Trial', work in progress.
31. FIELD, H. (1978), 'Attitudes toward Rape: A Comparative Analysis of Police, Rapist, Crisis Counselors and Citizens' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36: 156-179.
32. FEILD, H. and BIENEN, L. (1980), Jurors and Rape: A Study in Psychology and Law. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
33. FINCH, E. and MUNRO, V. (2005), Juror Stereotypes and Blame Attribution in Rape Cases Involving Intoxicants: Findings of a Pilot Study', British Journal of Criminology, 45: 25-38.
34. -(2006), 'Breaking Boundaries? Sexual Consent in the Jury Room', Legal Studies, 26: 303-20.
35. -(2007), 'The Demon Drink and the Demonised Woman: Socio-Sexual Stereotypes and Responsibility Attribution in Rape Trials Involving Intoxicants', Social and Legal Studies, 16: 591-614.
36. -(2008), 'Lifting the Veil: The Use of Focus Groups and Trial Simulations in Legal Research', Journal of Law and Society, 35: 30-51.
37. FISCHER, G. (1991), 'Cognitive Predictors of Not-Guilty Verdicts in a Simulated Acquaintance Rape Trial', Psychological Reports, 68: 1199-206.
38. -(1997), 'Gender Effects on Individual Verdicts and on Mock Jury Verdicts in a Simulated Acquaintance Rape Trial', Sex Roles, 36: 491-501.
39. FISCHER, K. (1989), 'Defining the Boundaries of Admissible Expert Psychological Testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome', University of Illinois Law Review, 691-734.
40. FISHER, B., DAIGLE, L., CULLEN, F. and TURNER, M. (2003), 'Reporting Sexual Victimization to the Police and Others: Results from a National-Level Study of College Women', Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30: 6-38.
41. FOLEY, L. and PIGOTT, M. (2000), 'Belief in a Just World and Jury Decisions in a Civil Rape Trial', Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30: 935-51.
42. FRAIZER, P. and BORGIDA, E. (1988), 'Juror common understanding and the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome evidence in court', Law & Human Behaviour, 12: 101-122.
43. FRAZIER, P. and BURNETT, J. (1994), 'Immediate Coping Strategies among Rape Victims', Journal of Counselling and Development, 72: 633-9.
44. FRECKLETON, I. (1998), 'Sexual Offence Prosecutions: A Barrister's Perspective', in P. Easteal, ed., Balancing the Scales: Rape, Law Reform and Australian Culture, 151-5. Sydney: Federation Press.
45. GREGORY, J. and LEES, S. (1996), 'Attrition in Rape and Sexual Assault Cases', British Journal of Criminology, 36: 1-17.
46. HARRIS, J. and GRACE, S. (1999), A Question of Evidence! Investigating and Prosecuting Rape in the 1990s, HORS 196. London: HMSO.
47. HEPBURN, J. (1980), 'The Objective Reality of Evidence and the Utility of Systematic Jury Selection', Law and Human Behaviour, 4: 89-102.
48. HINCK, S. and THOMAS, R. (1999), 'Rape Myth Acceptance in College Students: How Far Have We Come?', Sex Roles, 40: 815-32.
49. HMCPSI/HMIC (2002), A Report on the Joint Inspection into the Investigation and Prosecution of Cases Involving Allegations of Rape. London: HMCPSI.
50. -(2007), Without Consent: A Report on the Joint Inspection into the Investigation and Prosecution of Cases Involving Allegations of Rape. London: HMCPSI.
51. Home Office (2006), Convicting Rapists and Protecting Victims: Justice for Victims of Rape. London: Home Office.
52. JACOBSON, M. and POPVICH, P. (1983), 'Victim Attractiveness and Perceptions of Responsibility in an Ambiguous Rape Case', Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8: 100-4.
53. JORDAN, J. (1998), Reporting Rape: Women's Experiences with the Police, Doctors and Support Agencies. Wellington: Institute of Criminology.
54. -(2004), The Word of a Woman? Police, Rape and Belief. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
55. KAUFNANN, G., DREVLAND, G., WESSEL, E., OVERSKEID, G. and MAGNUSSEN, S. (2003), 'The Importance of Being Earnest: Displayed Emotions and Witness Credibility', Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17: 21-34.
56. KALVEN, H. and ZEISEL, H. (1966), The American Jury. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
57. KELLY, L., LOVETT, J. and REGAN, L. (2005), A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases HORS 293. London: Home Office.
58. KERR, N., and MACCOUN, R. (1985), 'The Effects of Jury Size and Polling Method on the Process and Product of Jury Deliberation', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 349-363.
59. KERR, N., NERENZ, D. and HERRICK, D. (1979), 'Role Playing and Study of Jury Behaviour', Sociological Methods and Research, 7: 337-55.
60. KILPATRICK, D., EDMUNDS, C and SEYMOUR, A. (1992), Rape in America: A Report to the Nation. Charleston, SC: National Victim Center and the Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina.
61. KLEINKE, C. and MEYER, C. (1990), 'Evaluation of Rape Victim by Men and Women with High and Low Belief in a Just World', Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14: 343-53.
62. KONRADI, A. (1999), '"I Don't Have to be Afraid of You": Rape Survivors' Emotion Management in Court', Symbolic Interaction, 22: 45-77.
63. -(2007), Rape Survivors and the Prosecution of Rapists. Connecticut: Praeger.
64. KOSS, M. (1988), 'Hidden Rape: Sexual Aggression and Victimisation in a National Sample of Students in Higher Education', in A. Burgess, ed., Rape and Sexual Assault II, 3-25. NY: Garland Publishing.
65. KOSS, M., DINERO, T., SEIBEL, C. and COX, S. (1988), 'Stranger and Acquaintance Rape: Are There Differences in the Victim's Experience?', Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12: 1-24.
66. KRULEWITZ, J. (1982), 'Reactions to Rape Victims: Effects of Rape Circumstances, Victim's Emotional Response, and Sex of Helper', Journal of Counselling Psychology, 29: 645-54.
67. KRULEWITZ, J. and NASH, J. (1979), 'Effects of Rape Victim Resistance, Assault Outcome, and Sex of Observer on Attributions about Rape', Journal of Personality, 47: 558-74.
68. LAFREE, G. (1980), 'Variables Affecting Guilty Pleas and Convictions in Rape Cases: Towards a Social Theory of Rape Processing', Social Forces, 58: 833-50.
69. LARCOMBE, W. (2002), 'The "Ideal" Victim v Successful Rape Complainants: Not What You Might Expect', Feminist Legal Studies, 10: 131-48.
70. LATANE, B., WILLIAMS, K. and HARKINS, S. (1979), 'Many Hands Makes Light Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing', Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 37: 822-32.
71. LEES, S. (1996), Carnal Knowledge Rape on Trial London: Hamish Hamilton.
72. LERNER, M. (1965), 'Evaluation of Performance as a Function of Performer's Reward and Attractiveness', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1: 355-60.
73. LITTLETON, H. and RADECKI BREITKOPF, C. (2006), 'Coping with the Experience of Rape', Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30: 106-16.
74. LONSWAY, K. and FITZGERALD, L. (1994), 'Rape Myths', Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18: 220-32.
75. MASSARO, T. (1985), 'Experts, Psychology, Credibility and Rape: The Rape Trauma Syndrome Issue and its Implications for Expert Psychological Testimony', Minnesota Law Review, 69: 395-470.
76. MORRY, M. and WINKLER, E. (2001), 'Student Acceptance and Expectation of Sexual Assault', Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33: 188-92.
77. MYHILL, A. and ALLEN, J. (2002), Rape and Sexual Assault of Women: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Findings 159. London: Home Office.
78. NORRIS, J. and CUBBINS, L. (1992), 'Dating, Drinking and Rape: Effects of Victims' and Assailants' Alcohol Consumption on Judgments of their Behaviour and Traits', Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16: 179-91.
79. Office for Criminal Justice Reform (2007), Convicting Rapists and Protecting Victims: Response to Consultation. London: Office for Criminal Justice Reform.
80. ONG, A. and WARD, C. (1999), 'The Effects of Sex and Power Schemas, Attitudes towards Women, and Victim Resistance on Rape Attributions', Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29: 362-76.
81. PETRAK, J. and HEDGE, B. (2002), The Trauma of Sexual Assault: Treatment, Prevention and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
82. POTTER, R. and BREWER, N. (1999), 'Perceptions of Witness Behaviour: Accuracy Relationships Held by Police, Lawyers and Mock Jurors', Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6: 97-103.
83. RAITT, F. and ZEEDYK, S. (1997), 'Rape Trauma Syndrome: Its Corroborative and Educational Roles', Journal ofLaw and Society, 24: 552-68.
84. REGAN, L. and KELLY, L. (2003), Rape: Still a Forgotten Issue. London: Child and Women Abuse Studies Unit. London Metropolitan University.
85. ROSE, M., NADLER, J. and CLARK, J. (2006), 'Appropriately Upset? Emotion Norms and Perceptions of Crime Victims', Law and Human Behaviour, 30: 203-19.
86. RUMNEY, P.(2006), 'False Allegations of Rape', Cambridge Law Journal, 65: 128-58.
87. SAKS, M. and MARTI, M. (1997), 'A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Jury Size', Law and Human Behaviour, 21: 451-67.
88. SCHULLER, R. and STEWART, A. (2000), 'Police Responses to Sexual Assault Complaints: The Role of Perpetrator/Complainant Intoxication', Law and Human Behavior, 24: 535-51.
89. SCHULT, D. and SCHNEIDER, L. (1991), 'The Role of Sexual Provocativeness, Rape History, and Observer Gender in Perceptions of Blame in Sexual Assault', Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6: 94-101.
90. SEALY, A. and CORNISH, W. (1973), Jurors and their Verdicts', Modern Law Review, 36: 496-508.
91. SHAVER, K. (1970), 'Defensive Attribution: Effects of Severity and Relevance on the Responsibility Assigned for an Accident', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14: 101-13.
92. SUGAR, N., FINE, D. and ECKERT, T. (2004), 'Physical Injury after Sexual Assault: Findings of a Large Case Series', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 190: 71-6.
93. TAYLOR, N. and JOUDO, J. (2005), The Impact ofPre-Recorded Video and Closed Circuit Television Testimony by Adult Sexual Assault Complainants on Jury Decision-Making An Experimental Study, Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series (No. 68). Canberra: AIC.
94. TEMKIN, J. and KRAHE, B. (2008), Sexual Assault and the Justice Gap: A Question of Attitude. Oxford: Hart.
95. TETREAULT, P. (1989), 'Rape Myth Acceptance: A Case for Providing Educational Expert Testimony in Rape Jury Trials', Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 7: 243-57.
96. TSOUDIS, O. (2002), 'The Influence of Empathy in Mock Jury Criminal Cases: Adding to the Affect Control Model', Western Criminology Review, 4: 55-67.
97. TSOUDIS, O. and SMITH-LOVIN, L. (1998), 'How Bad Was It? The Effects of Victim and Perpetrator Emotion on Responses to Criminal Court Vignettes', Social Forces, 77: 695-722.
98. UGWUEGBU, D. (1979), 'Racial and Evidential Factors in Juror Attribution of Legal Responsibility', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15: 133-46.
99. VRIJ, A. (1998), 'Nonverbal Communication and Credibility', in A. Memon, A. Vrij and R. Bull, eds, Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility, 32-58. London: McGraw-Hill.
100. VRIJ, A. and FISHER, A. (1997), 'The Role of Displays of Emotions and Ethnicity in Judgments of Rape Victims', International Review of Victimology, 4: 255-65.
101. WARD, C. (1995), Attitudes towards Rape: Feminist and Social Psychological Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
102. WESSEL, E., DREVLAND, G., EILERTSEN, D. and MAGNUSSEN, S. (2006), 'Credibility of the Emotional Witness: A Study of Ratings by Court Judges', Law and Human Behaviour, 30: 221-30.
103. WHATLEY, M. (2005), 'The Effect of Participant Sex, Victim Dress, and Traditional Attitudes on Causal Judgments for Marital Rape Victims', Journal of Family Violence, 20: 191-200.
104. WINKEL, F. and KOPPELAAR, L. (1991), 'Rape Victims' Style of Self-Presentation and Secondary-Victimisation by the Environment', Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6: 29-40.
105. WORKMAN, J. and FREEBURG, E. (1999), 'An Examination of Date Rape, Victim Dress, and Perceiver Variables within the Context of Attribution Theory', Sex Roles, 41: 261-77.
106. YESCAVAGE, K., (1999), 'Teaching Women a Lesson: Sexually Aggressive and Sexually Non-aggressive men's perceptions of acquaintance and date rape', Violence Against Women, 5: 796-812.
107. ZANDER, M. and HENDERSON, P. (1993), The Royal Commission of Criminal Justice: Crown Court Study, Research Study No. 19. London: HMSO.