Assessment of the quality of mini-HTA

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 42-48

  Kidholm, Kristian ^a   Ehlers, Lars ^b,c   Korsbek, Lisa ^a   Kjærby, Rolf ^a   Beck, Mickael ^a,d  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c Center of Public Health   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Hospital based HTA; Mini HTA; Quality; Transparency

Indexed keywords

CHECK-LISTS; CLINICAL EFFECTS; COST ESTIMATE; DENMARK; EARLY WARNING; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; MINI-HTA; NATIONAL LEVEL; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; QUALITY; QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATES;

COST ACCOUNTING; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH; QUALITY ASSURANCE; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; TECHNOLOGY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRANSPARENCY;

HOSPITALS;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CHECKLIST; DENMARK; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FUNDING; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DENMARK; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 60749097992     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309090060     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Busse R, Orvain J, Velasco M, et al. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments: Working Group 4 report. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:361-422. (Pubitemid 34533752)
2. Chantler C. Health-care technology assessment: A clinical perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:87-91. (Pubitemid 38656967)
3. Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment (DACEHTA). Introduction to mini-HTA - a management and decision support tool for the hospital service. Copenhagen: The National Board of Health; December 2005.
4. Ehlers L, Vestergaard M, Kidholm K, et al. Doing mini-health technology assessments in hospitals: A new concept of decision support in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:295-301. (Pubitemid 44469434)
5. Elston J, Stein K. A rapid needs assessment of the provision of health technology assessment in the south-west peninsula. J Public Health. 2007;29:157-164.
6. Folkersen J, Pedersen PH. [Attitudes to the use of a decision support method when introducing new medical technology at the University Hospital of Copenhagen] [Article in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2006;168:2069-2074.
7. Gagnon MP, Sanchez E, Pons JMV. Integration of health technology assessment recommendations into organizational and clinical practice: A case study in Catalonia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:169-176.
8. Hailey D. Toward transparency in health technology assessment. A checklist for HTA reports. 2003; Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:1-7. (Pubitemid 36356322)
9. Lafortune L, Farand L, Mondou I, et al. Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: A framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:76-86. (Pubitemid 351158546)
10. Maddern G. HTA in the hospital setting: The Australian experience. Ital J Public Health. 2005;2(Suppl 1):93.
11. McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:263-267. (Pubitemid 40656557)
12. Oliver A, Mossialos E, Robinson R. Health technology assessment and its influence on health-care priority setting. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:1-10. (Pubitemid 38656956)
13. The Danish HTA project database: www.sst.dk/Planlaegning-og-behandling/ Medicinsk-teknologivurdering/Publikationer/cemtv---Publikationsdatabasen.aspx? lang=en.
14. Watt A, Cameron A, Sturm L, et al. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:133-139.