Development and evaluation of a decision support method at the University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark;Holdningsundersøgelse vedrørende anvendelse af minimedicinsk teknologivurdering før indførelse af nye medicinske teknologier på Rigshospitalet

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 168, Issue 21, 2006, Pages 2069-2074

  Folkersen, Jørgen ^a   Pedersen, Poul Holt ^a   Borum, Finn ^a   Hilsted, Jannik ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST CONTROL; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DENMARK; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DENMARK; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVALUATION STUDIES; HEALTH POLICY; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATORS; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL;

EID: 33744456290     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alban A, Terkel C, red. The Nordic Lights - New Initiatives in Health Care Systems. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag, 1995.
2. Annas GJ. Reframing the debate on health care reform by replacing our metaphors. N Engl J Med 1995;332:744-7.
3. Hood C, Dunleavy P. From old public management to new public management. Public Management and Money 1994;(july-september):9-16.
4. Bentsen EZ, Borum F. Legitimering i et konfliktfyldt felt - en topledelses håndtering af en radikal organisationsændring. Nordiske Organisasjons- Studier 2001;3:5-31.
5. Ben-David J. The professional role of the physicians in bureaucratized medicine: a study of role conflict. Human Relations 1958;II:255-74.
6. Borum F, Zeuthen Bentsen E. At skabe ledelse - Rigshospitalets import af centerstrukturen. I: Zeuthen Bentsen E, Borum F, Erlingsdottir G et al, red. Når styringsambitioner møder praksis. Den svære omstilling af sygehus- og sundhedsvæsen i Danmark og Sverige. København: Handelshøjskolens forlag, 1999:243-64.
7. Sundhedsstyrelsens udvalg for Medicinsk Teknologivurdering. National strategi for medicinsk teknologivurdering. Sundhedsstyrelsen, 1996.
8. Barnett D, Taylor R. Introduction, National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) - Symposium on technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002;18:159-60.
9. Introduction to the EUR-ASSESS Report. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997;13:133-43.
10. Draborg E, Gyrd-Hansen D, Poulsen PB et al. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:89-95.
11. Vrangbæk K, Folkersen J. Vejledning i organisatorisk analyse ifbm MTV-projekter - omkring valg af undersøgelsesvariable. H:S Hvidovre Hospital, MTV-enheden, 2002.
12. Oversigt over Rigshospitalets mini-MTV-rapporter publiceret på MTV-enhedens webserver i årene 2002-2004. H:S Hvidovre Hospital, MTV-enheden, 2003.
13. King R, Fennessy P. Controlled introduction of new technology into a university teaching hospital. The use of health technology assessment into the safety and efficacy og each procedure. Abstract book from 19th annual ISTAHC meeting, Canmore, Canada, 144. 2003. www.mtve.dk/Nyhedsbreve/NyhedsbrevOct2003/ Canmini2.htm/jan.2006.
14. Lapointe A, Brophy J, Duftesne L. Technology assessment in teaching hospitals in Quebec: Where are we? Abstract book from 19th annual ISTAHC meeting, Canmore, Canada, 58. 2003. www.mtve.dk/Nyhedsbreve/NyhedsbrevOct2003/ canmini6.htm/jan.2006.
15. Lee RC, Marshall D, Waddell C et al. Health technology assessment, research, and implementation within a health region in Alberta, Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:513-20.
16. Greenberg D, Pliskin JS, Peterburg Y. Decision making in acquiring medical technologies in Israeli medical centers: a preliminary study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:194-201.