Therapeutic community drug treatment success in Peru: A follow-up outcome study

Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Johnson, Knowlton ^a   Pan, Zhenfeng ^a   Young, Linda ^a   Vanderhoff, Jude ^a   Shamblen, Steve ^a   Browne, Thom ^b   Linfield, Ken ^c   Suresh, Geetha ^d  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF STATE   (United States)

^c National Chair American Hand Therapy Foundation   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERU; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERU; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60649114304     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1747597X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-26     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. De Leon G: The therapTutic community: theory, model, and method New York: Springer 2000
2. Woodhams A: The staff member in the therapeutic community Therapeutic communities for the treatment of drug users. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Rawlings B, Yates R 2001 224 240
3. Sacks S Sacks JY De Leon G: Treatment for MICAs: Design and implementation of the modified TC. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 1999, 31:19-30. 10332635
4. Johnson KW Young LC Suresh G Berbaum ML: Drug abuse treatment training in Peru: A social policy experiment. Evaluation Review 2002, 26:480-519. 12243105
5. Simpson DD Sells SB: Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Advanced Alcohol Substance Abuse 1982, 2:7-29.
6. Simpson DD Sells SB: OpioiA addiction and treatment: a 12 year follow-up. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger 1990
7. Hubbard RL Marsden ME Rachal JV Harwood HJ Cavanaugh ER Ginzburg HM: Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press 1989
8. Simpson DT Brown BS: Special issue: treatment process and outcome studies from DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999, 57:81-174. 10.1016/ S0376-8716(99)00089-7
9. Simpson DD Curry SJ: Special issue: Drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997, 11:211-337. 10.1037/ 0893-164X.11.4.211
10. NTORS: Bulletin 4 Two year outcomes of the National Treatment Outcome Research Study 2000
11. Condelli WS Hubbard RL: Relationship between time spent in treatment and client outcomes from therapeutic communities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1994, 11:25-33. 10.1016/0740-5472(94)90061-2 8201630
12. Condelli W Hubbard R: Client outcomes from therapeutic communities Therapeutic Community: Advances. in Research and Application. Volume NIH Publication No. 94-3633 Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office Tims F, DeLeon G, Jainchill N 1994 80 98 National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series #144].
13. Ellingstad TP Sobell LC Sobell MB Planthara P: Drug treatment outcome methodology (1993-1997) strengths, weakness, and a comparison to the alcohol field. Addictive Behaviors 2002, 27:319-330. 10.1016/ S0306-4603(01)00261-1 12118623
14. Marlatt GA GorMon JR: Relapse prevention: maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford Press 1985
15. Wilson S Mandelbrote B: The relationship between duration of treatment in a therapeutic community for drug abusers and subsequent criminality. British Journal of Psychiatry 1978, 132:487-491. 10.1192/bjp.132.5.487 656713
16. Holland S:EGateway houses: effectiveness of treatment on criminal behavior. International Journal of the Addictions 1978, 13:369-381. 669861
17. Holland S: Evaluating community based treAtment programs: a model for strengthening inferences about effectiveness. International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 1983, 4:285-306.
18. De Leon G: The therapeutic community: Study of effectiveness Treatment Research Monograph Series. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse 1984
19. Dekel R Benbenishty R Amram Y: Therapeutic communities for drug addicts: prediction of long-term outcomes. Addictive Behaviors 2004, 29:1833-1837. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.01.009 15530725
20. Carroll JF McGinley JJ: An agency follow-up outcome study of graduates from four inner-city therapeutic community programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2000, 18:103-118. 10.1016/ S0740-5472(99)00036-7 10716094
21. De Leon G: The therapeutic community for Pubstance abuse: perspective and approach. Therapeutic communities for addictions. Springfield, IL: Thomas DeLeon G, Zeigenfuss JTJ 1986
22. Ravndal E: An outcome study of therapeutic community based in the community: A five-year prospective study of drug abusers in Norway Therapeutic communities for the treatment of drug users. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Rawlings B, Yates R 2001 224 240
23. Kooyman M: The therapeutic communIty for addicts: intimacy, parent involvement and treatment success. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger 1993
24. De Leon G Sacks S Staines G McKendrick K: Modified therapeutic community for homeless mentally ill chemical abusers: Treatment outcomes. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2000, 26:461-480. 10.1081/ADA-100100256
25. De Leon G: The therapSutic community: status and evolution. Int J Addict 1985, 20(6-7):823-844. 3908339
26. De Leon G: Therapeutic communities for Oubstance abuse: overview of approach and effectiveness. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1989 3
27. Gerstein DR Harwood HJ: SEds) Treating drug problems: study of the evolution, effectiveness, and financing of public and private drug treatment systems Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1990
28. Zhang Z Friedmann PD Gerstein DR: Does retention matter? Treatment duration and improvement in drug use. Addiction Biology 2003, 98:673. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00354.x
29. De Leon G: The therapSutic community: study of effectiveness
30. De Leon G Wexler H JaSnchill N: The therapeutic community: success and improvement rates 5 years after treatment. Int J Addict 1982, 17(4):703-747. 7107092
31. Simpson DD: The relation of the time in drug abuse treatment to post-treatment outcomes. American Journal of Psychiatry 1979, 136:1449-1453. 495799
32. Simpson DD: Follow-up outcomes and length of time spent in treatment for drug abuse. Fort Worth, TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University 1980
33. Gossop M Marsden J Stewart D Rolfe A: Treatment retention and 1 year outcomes for residential programmes in England. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999, 57:89-98. 10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00086-1
34. Nemes S Wish ED Messina N: Comparing the impact of standard and abbreviated treatment in therapeutic community: Findings from the District of Columbia Treatment Initiative Experiment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1999, 17:339-347. 10.1016/ S0740-5472(99)00009-4 10587936
35. Toumbourou JW Hamilton M Fallon B: Treatment levels progress and time spent in treatment in the prediction of outcomes following drug-free therapeutic community treatment. Addiction Biology 1998, 93:1051-1064. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.937105110.x
36. Chan M Sorensen JL Guydish J Rajima B Acampora A: Client satisfaction with drug abuse day treatment versus residential treatment. Journal of Drug Issues 1997, 27:367-377.
37. Inciardi JA: The therapeutic community: An effective model for corrections-based drug abuse treatment The dilemmas of corrections: Contemporary readings. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Haas KC, Alpert GP 3 1995 406 417
38. Stohr MK Hemmens C Shapiro B Chambers B Kelly L: Comparing inmate perception of two residential substance abuse treatment programs. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2002, 46(6):699-714. 10.1177/ 0306624X02238163 12491846
39. Strauss SM Falkin GP: The relationship between the quality of drug user treatment and program completion: Understanding the perceptions of women in a prison-based program. Substance Use & Misuse 2000, 35:2127-2159. 10.3109/10826080009148252 11138719
40. Carlson MJ Gabriel RM: Patient satisfaction, use of services, and one-year outcomes in publicly funded substance abuse treatment. Psychiatric Services 2001, 52:1230-1236. 10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1230 11533398
41. Kasarabada ND Hser YI Boles SM Huagn YC: Do patients' perceptions of their counselors influence outcomes of drug treatment?. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2002, 23:327-334. 10.1016/ S0740-5472(02)00276-3 12495794
42. Rohrbach LA Graham JW Hansen WB: Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: Predicators of program implementation. Preventive Medicine 1993, 22:237-260. 10.1006/pmed.1993.1020 8483862
43. Sechrest L Redner R: Strength and integrity of treatments in evaluation studies. Washington DC: National Criminal Justice Reference Service 1979
44. Prendergast ML Podus D Chang E: Program factors and treatment outcomes in drug dependence treatment: An examination using meta-analysis. Substance Use & Misuse 2000, 35:1931-1965. 10.3109/10826080009148246 11138713
45. Botvin GJ Baker E Dusenbury L Tortu S Botvin EM: Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a 3-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990, 58:437-446. 10.1037/0022-006X.58.4.437
46. Botvin GJ Batson HW Witts-Vitale S Bess V Baker E Dusenbury L: A psychosocial approach to smoking prevention for urban black youth. Public Health Rep 1989, 104:573-582. 1580145 2511590
47. Emshoff JG Blakely CH Gray D Jakes S Brounstein PJ Coulter JB: An ESID case study at the federal level. Am J Community Psychol 2001, 32(3-4):345-357.
48. Pentz MA Trebow E Hansen WB MacKinnon DP Dwyer JH Johnson CA Flay BR Daniels S Cormack C: Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP). Evaluation Review 1990, 14:264-289. 10.1177/0193841X9001400303
49. Hansen WB Graham JW Wolkenstein BH Rohrbach LA: Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness: Results for fifth grade students in the adolescent alcohol prevention trial. J Stud Alcohol 1991, 52(6):568-579. 1758184
50. Mistral W Hall A McKee P: Using therapeutic community principles to improve the functioning of a high care psychiatric ward in the UK. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 2002, 11:10-17. 10.1046/ j.1440-0979.2002.00220.x 12400102
51. Tsiboukli A Wolff K: Using focus group interviews to understand staff perceptions from training in the therapeutic community model. Journal of Drug Education 2003, 33:143-157. 10.2190/FUK5-BQVL-R53W-4RG7 12929706
52. Wiedman A: Family therapy and reductions in treatment dropout in a residential therapeutic community for chemically dependent adolescents. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1987, 4:21-28. 10.1016/ 0740-5472(87)90006-7 3612889
53. McMillin S: Stigma can kill - be a stigma buster! Addiction Letter 1995,11:4-6.
54. Furst RT Johnson BD Dunlap E: The stigmatized image of the "crack head": A sociocultural exploration of a barrier to cocaine smoking among a cohort of youth in New York City Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1999, 20:153-181.
55. Falck RS Wang J Carlson RG Eddy M Siegal HA: The prevalence and correlates of depressive symptomatology among a community sample of crack-cocaine smokers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2002, 34:281-288. 12422938
56. Semple SJ Patterson TL Rant I: Methamphetamine use and depressive symptoms among heterosexual men and women. Journal of Substance Use 2005, 10:31-47. 10.1080/1465989042000271264
57. Link BG: Understanding labeling effects in the area of mental disorders: An assessment of the effects of expectations of rejection. American Sociological Review 1987, 52:96-112. 10.2307/2095395
58. Link BG Cullen FT Struening E Shrout PE Dohrenwend BP: A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review 1989, 54:400-423. 10.2307/2095613
59. Room R: Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug and Alcohol Review 2005, 24:143-155. 10.1080/09595230500102434
60. Drogas CdIyEplPdAd The impact of drugs on Peru Lima: CEDRO 1996
61. Navarro R: Development of a program of behavior modification directed to the rehabilitation of drug-dependent patients: Treatment and follow-up of 223 cases. The International Journal of the Addictions 1992, 27:391-408. 1563892
62. Navarro R: Teripia y modificacion de la coTducta adictiva: tratamiento y sequimiento de 2 casos de addiccion a la pasta basica de cocaine. Anales del Quinto Congreso Nacional de Psiquiatria 1978:226-231.
63. Navarro R: Modificacion de la conducta adictiva: Tratamiento y sequimiento de 2 casos de addiccion a PBC. Rev Neuro-Psiquiatr 1978. 41:83-91.
64. Sanchez E: Sistemas de tratamiento y rehabilitacion de farmacodependencia. Anales del Sexto Congreso Nacional de Psiquiatria 1980:80-93.
65. Navarro R: Terapia de la conducta en el comportamiento dependiente a drogas: Tratamiento y seguimiento de 26 casos clinicos. Rev Peruana Psiquiatr "Hermilio Valdizan" 1983, 1:29-38.
66. A review of the retrospective pretest: Implications for performance improvement evaluation and research [Electronic Version] http://voc.ed.psu.edu/projects/publications/books/Spring2007/ WEF_spring2007.3.html
67. Howard GS Ralph KM Gulanick NA Maxwell SE Gerber SK: Internal validity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement 1979, 3:1-23. 10.1177/014662167900300101
68. Melnick G De Leon G: Clarifying the nature of therapeutic community treatment: The survey of essential elements questionnaire (SEEQ). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1999, 16:307-313. 10.1016/ S0740-5472(98)00036-1 10349603
69. Johnson KW Young L Pan T Zimmerman RS Vanderhoff KJ: Therapeutic Communites (TC) drug treatment success in Thailand: A 2006 follow-up study. Research Monograph US Department of State's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. Louisville, KY: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation - Louisville Center 2007
70. Schafer JL: Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman & Hall 1997
71. SPSS SPSS advanced statistics 7.5 Chicago, IL: Author 1997
72. Bruning JL Kintz BL: Computational handbook of statistics New Jersey: Pearson Education 4
73. Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates 2 1988
74. Hannan PJ Murray DM: Gauss or Bernoulli - A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model and the logistic mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level. Evaluation Review 1996, 3:338-352. 10.1177/0193841X9602000306
75. Bryk AS Raudenbush SW Congdon RT: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L Programs. Chicago, IL: SSI 1992
76. Raudenbush SW Bryk AS:AHierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 2 2002
77. Hubbard RL Craddock SG Flynn PM Anderson J Etheridge RM: Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997, 11:261-278. 10.1037/ 0893-164X.11.4.261
78. Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): The National Treatment Improvement Evaluation study: Final report. Services USDoHaH ed.: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 1997
79. Gossop M Marsden J Stewart D Edwards C Lehmann P Wilson A Segar G: The National Treatment Outcome Research Study in the United Kingdom: six-month follow-up outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997, 11:324-337. 10.1037/0893-164X.11.4.324
80. The retrospective pretest: An imperfect evaluation exchange, XI, No. 2 http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/eval/issue30/spotlight.html
81. Johnson KW Young L Suresh G: Evaluation study of street children institutions in Brazil and Peru. Louisville, KY: Community Systems Research Institute, Inc. & Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation 2000