An agency follow-up outcome study of graduates from four inner-city therapeutic community programs

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 103-118

  Carroll, Jerome F X ^a   McGinley, John J ^a  

^a Project Return Foundation Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcomes research; Program evaluation; Tennessee Self Concept Scale:2; Therapeutic community; Treatment effectiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY;

ADULT; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SAMPLING STUDIES; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL PROBLEMS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 0034089265     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-5472(99)00036-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Carroll J.F.X. "Mental illness" and "disease"; outmoded concepts in alcohol and drug rehabilitation. Community Mental Health Journal. 11:1975;418-429.
2. Carroll J.F.X. Personality and psychopathology. a comparison of alcohol and drug-dependent persons. In J. Solomon & K. A. Keeley (Eds.) Perspectives in Alcohol and Drug Abuse: Similarities and Differences (pp. 59-88). Boston:(John Wright PSG Inc):1982.
3. Carroll J.F.X. The evolving American therapeutic community. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 9:1992;175-181.
4. Carroll, J. F. X. (1994). Clinical issues in therapeutic communities. In F. Tims, G. De Leon, & N. Jainchill (Eds.). Therapeutic Community: Advances in Research and Application (NIDA Research Monograph 144) (pp. 268-279). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
5. Carroll J.F.X., Malloy T.E., Roscioli D.L., Pindjak G.M., Clifford S. Similarities and differences in self-concepts of women alcoholics and drug addicts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 43:1982;725-738.
6. Carroll, J. F. X., & McGinley, J. J. (1995). Pre-Treatment Survey. Unpublished survey instrument, Project Return Foundation, Inc., New York, NY.
7. Carroll, J. F. X., & McGinley, J. J. (1997). Post-Treatment Follow-Up Survey. Unpublished survey instrument, Project Return Foundation, Inc., New York, NY.
8. Carroll J.F.X., McGinley J.J. Managing MICA clients in a modified therapeutic community with enhanced staffing. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15:1998;565-577.
9. De Leon G. The Therapeutic Community. Study of Effectiveness (DHHS Publication No. ADM 84-1286):1984;U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
10. Evenson R.C., Binner P.R., Cho D.W., Schicht W.W., Topolski J.M. An outcome study of Missouri's CSTAR alcohol and drug abuse programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15:1998;143-150.
11. Finigan M. Societal Outcomes and Cost Savings of Drug and Alcohol Treatment in the State of Oregon. 1996;Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs, Oregon Department of Human Resources and the Governor's Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs, Salem, OR.
12. Fitts W.H., Warren W.L. Tennessee Self-Concept Scale:2 Manual. 2nd ed:1996;Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.
13. Fletcher B.W., Tims F.M., Brown B.S. Drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). treatment evaluation research in the United States Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 11:1997;216-229.
14. Gerstein D.R., Johnson R.A., Harwood H.J., Suter N., Malloy K. Evaluating Recovery Services. The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA):1994;California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Sacramento, CA.
15. Harwood H./The., Lewin Group Performance Measurement for Substance Abuse Treatment Providers and CSAT Knowledge Development and Application. (Document produced under CSAT contract 270-94-0001 NEDTAC). 1997;The Lewin Group, Fairfax, VA.
16. Hubbard R.L., Craddock S.G., Flynn P.M., Anderson J., Etheridge R.M. Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 11:1997;261-278.
17. Hubbard R.L., Marsden M.E., Rachal J.V., Harwood H.J., Cavanaugh E.R., Ginzberg H.M. Drug Abuse Treatment. A National Study of Effectiveness:1989;University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
18. Kramer J.J., Conoley J.C. The Thirteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. 1998;University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
19. McGinley, J. J., & Carroll, J. F. X. (1996). Correlates of Short-term Retention in a Residential Therapeutic Community. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Hunter College Psychology Convention, New York, NY.
20. Merrill J. Evaluating treatment effectiveness. changing our expectations Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15:1998;175-176.
21. Mueller M.D., Wyman J.R. Study sheds new light on the state of drug abuse treatment nationwide. NIDA Notes. 12:1997;4-8.
22. Final Drafts. Chemical Dependence Regulations:1997;Author, Albany, NY.
23. Chemical dependency treatment programs in Minnesota. treatment effectiveness and cost offset analysis. Research News. 1996;Minnesota Department of Human Services, Chemical Dependency Division, St. Paul, MN.
24. Simpson D.D. Drug treatment evaluation in the United States. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 7:1993;120-128.
25. Simpson D.D., Curry S.J. Special issue. Drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS) Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 11:1997;210-338.
26. Simpson D.D., Joe G.W., Lehman W.E. Addiction Careers. Summary of Studies Based on the DARP 12-Year Follow-Up (DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 86-1420):1986;National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
27. Simpson D.D., Sells S.B. Opioid Addiction and Treatment. A 12-Year Follow-Up:1990;Robert E. Krieger, Malabar, FL.