The effect of surface colour on the adhesion strength of Elminius modestus Darwin on a commercial non-biocidal antifouling coating at two locations in the UK

Biofouling

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 215-227

  Robson, Martha A ^a   Williams, David ^b   Wolff, Kirsten ^a   Thomason, Jeremy C ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b International Paint Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adhesion strength; Barnacle; Colour; Fouling release; Intersleek 700 ; Recruitment; Silicone; Surface characteristics

Indexed keywords

PAINT; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

BIOASSAY; BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); COATED MATERIALS; PIGMENTS; SILICONES;

ADHESION; ANTIFOULING AGENT; COATING; COLOR; CRUSTACEAN;

ADHESION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COLOR; EVALUATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LARVA; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THORACICA; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADHESIVENESS; ANIMALS; COLOR; GREAT BRITAIN; LARVA; MATERIALS TESTING; PAINT; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THORACICA;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

ELMINIUS MODESTUS; THORACICA;

EID: 60549101368     PISSN: 08927014     EISSN: 10292454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927010802712879     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aldred N, Clare AS. 2008. The adhesive strategies of cyprids and development of barnacle-resistant marine coatings. Biofouling 24:351-363.
2. Anderson DT. editor. 1994. Barnacles: structure, function, development and evolution. London: Chapman and Hall.
3. ASTM. 1997. Standard test method for measurement of barnacle adhesion strength in shear. American Standard for Testing and Materials. Paint - Tests for formulated products and applied coatings. USA: ASTM.
4. Berglin M, Gatenholm P. 2003. The barnacle adhesive plaque: morphological and chemical differences as a response to substrate properties. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 28:107-117.
5. Berglin M, Lonn N, Gatenholm P. 2003. Coating modulus and barnacle bioadhesion. Biofouling 19(Suppl):63-69.
6. Berglin M, Larsson A, Jonsson PR, Gatenholm P. 2001. The adhesion of the barnacle, Balanus improvisus, to poly (dimethylsiloxane) fouling-release coatings and poly (methyl methacrylate) panels: the effect of barnacle size on strength and failure mode. J Adhes Sci Technol 15:1485-1502.
7. Bishop DM. 1947. Establishment of an immigrant barnacle in British coastal waters. Nature 159:501.
8. Brady RF. 1999. Properties which influence marine fouling resistance in polymers containing silicone and fluorine. Prog Org Coat 35:31-35.
9. Brady RF, Singer IL. 2000. Mechanical factors favoring release from fouling release coatings. Biofouling 15:73-81.
10. Callow ME, Fletcher RL. 1994. The influence of low surface energy materials on bioadhesion - a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 34:333-348.
11. Callow ME, Callow JA. 2002. Marine biofouling: a sticky problem. Biologist 49:1-5.
12. Chaudhury MK, Finlay JA, Chung JY, Callow ME, Callow JA. 2005. The influence of elastic modulus and thickness on the release of the soft-fouling green alga Ulva linza (syn. Enteromorpha linza) from poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) model networks. Biofouling 21:41-48.
13. Chung JY, Chaudhury MK. 2005. Soft and hard fouling. J Adhes 81:1119-1145.
14. Clare AS, Høeg JT. 2008. Balanus amphitrite or Amphibalanus amphitrite? A note on barnacle nomenclature. Biofouling 24:55-57.
15. Connell J. 1985. The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs. post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 93:11-45.
16. Crisp DJ. 1958. The spread of Elminius modestus Darwin in North West Europe. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 37:483-520.
17. Crisp DJ, Walker GC, Young GA, Yule AB. 1985. Adhesion and substrate choice in mussels and barnacles. J Colloid Interface Sci 104:40-50.
18. Dahlem C, Moran PJ, Grant TR. 1984. Larval settlement of marine sessile invertebrates on surfaces of different colour and position. Ocean Sci Eng 9:225-236.
19. Dahlstrom M, Jonsson H, Jonsson PR, Elwing H. 2004. Surface wettability as a determinant in the settlement of the barnacle Balanus improvisus (Darwin). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 305:223-232.
20. Dreanno C, Kirby RR, Clare AS. 2006. Smelly feet are not always a bad thing: the relationship between cyprid footprint protein and the barnacle settlement pheromone. Biol Lett 2:423-425.
21. Dring M. 1998. The biology of marine plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Finlay JA, Fletcher BR, Callow ME, Callow JA. 2008. Effect of background colour on growth and adhesion strength of Ulva sporelings. Biofouling 24:219-225.
23. Finlay JA, Callow ME, Ista LK, Lopez GP, Callow JA. 2002. The influence of surface wettability on the adhesion strength of settled spores of the green alga Enteromorpha and the diatom Amphora. Integr Comp Biol 42:1116-1122.
24. Flowerdew MW. 1984. Electrophoretic comparison of the antipodean cirripede, Elminius modestus, with immigrant European populations. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64:625-635.
25. Gaylord B, Blanchette CA, Denny MW. 1994. Mechanical consequences of size in wave-swept algae. Ecol Monogr 64:287-313.
26. Harrison PJH, Sandeman DC. 1999. Morphology of the nervous system of the barnacle cypris larva (Balanus amphitrite Darwin) revealed by light and electron microscopy. Biol Bull 197:144-158.
27. Kamino K. 2001. Novel barnacle underwater adhesive protein is a charged amino acid-rich protein constituted by a cys-rich repetitive sequence. Biochem J 356:503-507.
28. Kendall K. 1971. The adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids. J Phys D Appl Phys 4:1186-1195.
29. Khandeparker L, Anil AC. 2007. Underwater adhesion: the barnacle way. Int J Adhes Adhes 27:165-172.
30. Kim J, Nyren-Erickson E, Stafslien S, Daniels J, Bahr J, Chisholm BJ. 2008. Release characteristics of reattached barnacles to non-toxic silicone coatings. Biofouling 24:313-319.
31. Koehl MAR. 2007. Mini review: hydrodynamics of larval settlement into fouling communities. Biofouling 23:357-368.
32. Kohl JG, Singer IL. 1999. Pull-off behaviour of epoxy bonded to silicone duplex coatings. Prog Org Coat 36:15-20.
33. Kon-ya K, Miki W. 1994. Effects of environmental factors on larval settlement of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite reared in the laboratory. Fish Sci 60:563-565.
34. Lawson J, Davenport J, Whitaker A. 2004. Barnacle distribution in Lough Hyne marine nature reserve: a new baseline and account of invasion by the introduced Australasian species Elminius modestus Darwin. Estuaruarine Coast Shelf Sci 60:729-735.
35. Leys SP, Cronin TW, Degnan BM, Marshall NJ. 2002. Spectral sensitivity in a sponge larva. J Comp Physiol A Sens Neural Behav Physiol 188:199-202.
36. Li NK, Denny MW. 2004. Limits to phenotypic plasticity: flow effects on barnacle feeding appendages. Biol Bull 206:121-124.
37. Maki JS, Yule AB, Rittschof D, Mitchell R. 1994. The effect of bacterial films on the temporary adhesion and permanent fixation of cypris larvae, Balanus amphitrite Darwin. Biofouling 8:121-131.
38. Marchinko KB. 2003. Dramatic phenotypic plasticity in barnacle legs (Balanus glandula Darwin): magnitude, age, dependence, and speed of response. Evolution 57:1281-1290.
39. Marshall NJ, Jones JP, Cronin TW. 1996. Behavioural evidence for colour vision in stomatopod crustaceans. J Comp Physiol A Sens Neural Behav Physiol 179:473-481.
40. McCarthy DA, Forward RB, Young CM. 2002. Ontogeny of phototaxis and geotaxis during larval development of the sabellariid polychaete Phragmatopoma lapidosa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 241:215-220.
41. Owens DK, Wendt RC. 1969. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polymer Sci 13:1741-1747.
42. Phang IY, Aldred N, Clare AS, Callow JA, Vancso GJ. 2006. An in situ study of the nanomechanical properties of barnacle (Balanus amphitrite) cyprid cement using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Biofouling 22:245-250.
43. Pomerat CM, Reiner ER. 1942. The influence of surface angle and of light on the attachment of barnacles and other sedentary organisms. Biol Bull 82:14-25.
44. Prendergast GS, Zurn CM, Bers AV, Head RM, Hansson LJ, Thomason JC. 2009. The relative magnitude of the effects of biological and physical settlement cues for cypris larvae of the acorn barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides L. Biofouling 25:35-44.
45. Ramsay DB, Dickinson GH, Orihuela B, Rittschof D, Wahl KJ. 2008. Base plate mechanics of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite (=Amphibalanus amphitrite). Biofouling 24:109-118.
46. Rasband WS. 1997-2007. ImageJ. Bethesda (MD): US National Institute of Health.
47. Russ JC. 1994. The image processing handbook. London: CRC Press.
48. Sun Y, Guo S, Walker GC, Kavanagh C, Swain G. 2004. Surface elastic modulus of barnacle adhesive and release characteristics from silicone surfaces. Biofouling 20:279-289.
49. Swain G, Herpe S, Ralston E, Tribou M. 2006. Short-term testing of antifouling surfaces: the importance of colour. Biofouling 22:425-429.
50. Syverud K, Chinga G, Johnssen PO, Leirset I, Wiik K. 2007. Analysis of lint particles from full-scale printing trials. Appita J 60:286-290.
51. Visscher JP, Luce RH. 1928. Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles to light with special reference to spectral colors. Biol Bull 54:336-350.
52. Walker GC. 1981. The adhesion of barnacles. J Adhesion 12:51-58.
53. Wendt DE, Kowalke GL, Kim J, Singer IL. 2006. Factors that influence elastomeric coating performance: the effect of coating thickness on basal plate morphology, growth, and critical removal stress of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite. Biofouling 22:1-9.
54. Yule AB, Walker G. 1984a. The adhesion of the barnacle, Balanus balanoides, to slate surfaces. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64:147-156.
55. Yule AB, Walker G. 1984b. The temporary adhesion of barnacle cyprids: effects of some differing surface characteristics. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64:429-439.
56. Yule AB, Walker G. 1985. Settlement of Balanus balanoides: the effect of cyprid antennular secretion. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 65:707-712.