The relative magnitude of the effects of biological and physical settlement cues for cypris larvae of the acorn barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides L.

Biofouling

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 35-44

  Prendergast, Gabrielle S ^a   Zurn, Constanze M ^a   Bers, A Valeria ^b   Head, Ritchie M ^c   Hansson, Lars J ^d   Thomason, Jeremy C ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b GEOMAR HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR OCEAN RESEARCH KIEL   (Germany)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

^d SWEDISH METEOROLOGICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Barnacle; Density; Gregarious; Orientation; Path analysis; Texture

Indexed keywords

SEA WATER;

BIODIVERSITY; MARINE BIOLOGY;

CRUSTACEAN; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; LARVA; LARVAL SETTLEMENT; ORIENTATION BEHAVIOR; PATH ANALYSIS; TEXTURE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; LARVA; PHYSIOLOGY; SEDIMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; THORACICA; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CUES; ENVIRONMENT; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; LARVA; MARINE BIOLOGY; SCOTLAND; SEAWATER; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THORACICA;

ARGYLL AND BUTE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GREAT CUMBRAE; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

BALANIDAE; SEMIBALANUS BALANOIDES; THORACICA;

EID: 57349108242     PISSN: 08927014     EISSN: 10292454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927010802444267     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abelson A, Weihs D, Loya Y. 1994. Hydrodynamic impediments to settlement of marine propagules, and adhesive-filament solution. Limnol Oceanogr 39:164-169.
2. Aldred N, Clare AS. 2008. Mini-review: the adhesive strategies of cyprids and development of barnacle-resistant marine coatings. Biofouling 24:351-363.
3. Baynes TW. 1999. Factors structuring a subtidal encrusting community in the southern Gulf of California. Bull Mar Sci 64:419-450.
4. Bernays EA, Chapman RF. 1994. Host plant selection by phytophagous insects. New York: Chapman & Hall.
5. Berntsson KM, Jonsson PR, Lejhall M, Gatenholm P. 2000. Analysis of behavioural rejection of micro-textured surfaces and implications for recruitment by the barnacle Balanus improvisus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 251:59-83.
6. Bers AV, Prendergast GS, Zurn CM, Hansson LJ, Head RM, Thomason JC. 2006. A comparative study of the anti-settlement properties of mytilid shells. Biol Lett 2:88-91.
7. Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Wahle RA. 1996. Wind-driven settlement patterns in the acorn barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 137:103-110.
8. Brind'Amour A, Bourget E, Tremblay R. 2002. Fecundity, growth rate and survivorship at the interface between two contiguous genetically distinct groups of Semibalanus balanoides. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229:173-184.
9. Carman M, Estes T, Feinberg A, Schumacher J, Wilkerson W, Wilson L, Callow ME, Callow JA, Brennan AB. 2007. Engineered antifouling microtopographies - correlating wettability with cell attachment. Biofouling 22:11-21.
10. Chabot R, Bourget E. 1988. Influence of substratum heterogeneity and settled barnacle density on the settlement of cypris larvae. Mar Biol 97:45-56.
11. Clare AS, Matsumura K. 2000. Nature and perception of barnacle settlement pheromones. Biofouling 15:57-71.
12. Connell SD. 1999. Effects of surface orientation on the cover of epibiota. Biofouling 14:219-226.
13. Crisp DJ. 1955. The behaviour of barnacle cyprids in relation to water movement over a surface. J Exp Biol 32:569-590.
14. Crisp DJ, Ritz DA. 1973. Responses of cirripede larvae to light. I. Experiments with white light. Mar Biol 23:327-335.
15. Dahlstrom M, Jonsson H, Jonsson PR, Elwing H. 2004. Surface wettability as a determinant in the settlement of the barnacle Balanus improvisus (Darwin). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 305:223-232.
16. Dreanno C, Matsumura K, Dohmae N, Takio K, Hirota H, Kirby RR, Clare AS. 2006. An alpha(2)-macroglobulin-like pretein is the cue to gregarious settlement of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:14396-14401.
17. Eckman JE, Werner FE, Gross TF. 1994. Modelling some effects of behavior on larval settlement in a turbulent boundary layer. Deep Sea Res Pt II 41:185-208.
18. Elbourne PD, Veater RA, Clare AS. 2008. Interaction of conspecific cues in Balanus amphitrite Darwin (Cirripedia) settlement assays: continued argument for the single-larva assay. Biofouling 24:87-96.
19. Glasby TM. 1999. Effects of shading on subtidal epibiotic assemblages. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 234:275-290.
20. Glasby TM. 2000. Surface composition and orientation interact to affect subtidal epibiota. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 248:177-190.
21. Granhag LM, Finlay JA, Jonsson PR, Callow JA, Callow ME. 2004. Roughness-dependent removal of settled spores of the green alga Ulva (syn. Enteromorpha) exposed to hydrodynamic forces from a water jet. Biofouling 20:117-122.
22. Grosberg RK. 1982. Intertidal zonation of barnacles: the influence of planktonic zonation of larvae on vertical distribution of adults. Ecology 63:894-899.
23. Guenther J, De Nys R. 2007. Surface microtopographies of tropical sea stars: lack of an efficient physical defence mechanism against fouling. Biofouling 23:419-429.
24. Head RM, Overbeke K, Klijnstra J, Biersteker R, Thomason JC. 2003. The effect of gregariousness in cyprid settlement assays. Biofouling 19:269-278.
25. Head RM, Berntsson KM, Dahlstrom M, Overbeke K, Thomason JC. 2004. Gregarious settlement in cypris larvae: the effects of cyprid age and assay duration. Biofouling 20:123-128.
26. Hills JM, Thomason JC. 1996. A multi-scale analysis of settlement density and pattern dynamics of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 138:103-115.
27. Hills JM, Thomason JC. 1998a. The effect of scales of surface roughness on the settlement of barnacle (Semibalanus balanoides) cyprids. Biofouling 12:57-69.
28. Hills JM, Thomason JC. 1998b. On the effect of tile size and surface texture on recruitment pattern and density of the barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides. Biofouling 13:31-50.
29. Hills JM, Thomason JC. 2003. Recruitment density can determine adult morphology and fecundity in the barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides. Biofouling 19:205-213.
30. Hills JM, Thomason JC, Muhl J. 1998. A precise and accurate technique for the manufacture of comples three-dimensional surfaces. Biofouling 13:125-136.
31. Hills JM, Thomason JC, Muhl J. 1999. Settlement of barnacle larvae is governed by Euclidean and not fractal surface characteristics. Funct Ecol 13:868-875.
32. Holmes SP, Sturgess CJ, Davies MS. 1997. The effect of rock-type on the settlement of Balanus balanoides (L) cyprids. Biofouling 11:137-147.
33. Hutchinson GE. 1965. The ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. The niche: an abstractly inhabited hypervolume. New Haven: YU Press. p. 26-78.
34. Jarrett JN. 1997. Temporal variation in substratum specificity of Semibalanus balanoides (Linnaeus) cyprids. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 211:103-114.
35. Keough MJ, Raimondi PT. 1996. Responses of settling invertebrate larvae to bio-organic films: effects of large-scale variation in films. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 207:59-78.
36. Koehl MAR. 2007. Mini review: hydrodynamics of larval settlement into fouling communities. Biofouling 23:357-368.
37. Kon-Ya K, Miki W. 1994. Effects of environmental-factors on larval settlement of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite reared in the laboratory. Fisheries Sci 60:563-565.
38. Li CC. 1977. Path analysis - a primer. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, California: The Boxwood Press.
39. Matsumura K, Hills JM, Thomason PO, Thomason JC, Clare AS. 2000. Discrimination at settlement in barnacles: laboratory and field experiments on settlement behaviour in response to settlement-inducing protein complexes. Biofouling 16:181-190.
40. Mazzarolle MJ. 2004. Mouvements et reproduction des amphibiens en tourbieres perturbees. Thèse de Doctorat. Québec: Université Laval.
41. Miron G, Boudreau B, Bourget E. 1999. Intertidal barnacle distribution: a case study using multiple working hypotheses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:205-219.
42. Navarrete SA, Wieters EA. 2000. Variation in barnacle recruitment over small scales: larval predation by adults and maintenance of community pattern. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 253:131-148.
43. Nowell ARM, Jumars PA. 1984. Flow environments of aquatic benthos. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:303-328.
44. Olivier F, Tremblay R, Bourget E, Rittschof D. 2000. Barnacle settlement: field experiments on the influence of larval supply, tidal level, biofilm quality and age on Balanus amphitrite cyprids. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 199:185-204.
45. Prendergast GS, Zurn CM, Bers AV, Head RM, Hansson LJ, Thomason JC. 2008. Field-based video observations of wild barnacle cyprid behaviour in response to textural and chemical settlement cues. Biofouling 24:449-459.
46. Qian PY, Rittschof D, Sreedhar B, Chia FS. 1999. Macrofouling in unidirectional flow: miniature pipes as experimental models for studying the effects of hydrodynamics on invertebrate larval settlement. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 191:141-151.
47. Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Rittschof D, Branscomb ES, Costlow JD. 1984. Settlement and behaviour in relation to flow and surface in larval barnacles, Balanus amphitrite Darwin. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 82:131-146.
49. Rittschof D, Forward RB, Cannon G, Welch JM, McClary M, Holm ER, Clare AS, Conova S, McKelvey LM, Bryan P, et al. 1998. Cues and context: larval responses to physical and chemical cues. Biofouling 12:31-44.
50. Schumacher JF, Aldred N, Callow ME, Finlay JA, Callow JA, Clare AS, Brennan AB. 2007. Species-specific engineered antifouling topographies: correlations between the settlement of algal zoospores and barnacle cyprids. Biofouling 23:307-317.
51. Thompson RC, Norton TA, Hawkins SJ. 1998. The influence of epilithic microbial films on the settlement of Semibalanus balanoides cyprids - a comparison between laboratory and field experiments. Hydrobiologia 375/ 376:203-216.
52. Thomason JC, Hills JM, Mapson P. 2000. The consequences of seasonal reproductive strategies for the interpretation of settlement trials. Biofouling 16:323-329.
53. Thomason JC, Hills JM, Thomason PO. 2002a. Field-based behavioural bioassays for testing the efficacy of antifouling coatings. Biofouling 18:285-292.
54. Thomason JC, Le Tissier MDAA, Thomason PO, Field SN. 2002b. Optimising settlement tiles: the effects of surface texture and energy, orientation and deployment duration upon the fouling community. Biofouling 18:293-304.
55. Todd CD, Phelan PJC, Weinmann BE, Gude AR, Andrews C, Paterson DM, Lonergan ME, Miron G. 2006. Improvements to a passive trap for quantifying barnacle larval supply to semi-exposed rocky shores. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 332:135-150.
56. Walters LJ, Wethey DS. 1996. Settlement and early post settlement survival of sessile marine invertebrates on topographically complex surfaces: the importance of refuge dimensions and adult morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 137:161-171.
57. Walters LJ, Miron G, Bourget E. 1999. Endoscopic observations of invertebrate larval substratum exploration and settlement. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 182:95-108.
58. Wethey DS. 1986. Ranking of settlement cues by barnacle larvae: influence of surface contour. B Mar Sci 39:393-400.
59. Wethey DS, Luckenbach MW, Kelly CA. 1988. Larval settlement in barnacles: influence of water flow. In. Marine biodeterioration: advanced techniques applicable to the Indian Ocean. New Dehli: Oxford & IBH Publishing. p. 499-511.