Efferent auditory system: Its effect on auditory processing;Sistema auditivo eferente: Efeito no processamento auditivo

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 737-745

  Burguetti, Fernanda Acaui Ribeiro ^a,b   Carvallo, Renata Mota Mamede ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Faculdade de Medicina da USP ^*

Author keywords

Hearing disorders; Hearing tests; Otoacoustic emissions; Reflex; Spontaneous

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFERENT AUDITORY SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; SCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 60549100345     PISSN: 18088694     EISSN: 18088686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31385-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hill JC, Prasher DK, Luxon LM. Evidence efferent effects on auditory afferent activity and their functional relevance. Clin Otolaryngol 1997; 22:394-402.
2. Bruel MLF, Sanchez TG, Bento RF. Vias auditivas eferentes e seu papel no sistema auditivo. Arq Otorrinolaringol 2001;5(2):62-7.
3. Hood LJ, Berlin CI. Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. In: Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Ricci A. (Eds.) Hair cells micromechanics and otoacoustic emissions: new developments. San Diego: Singular Publishing - Thomsen Learning;2001. p. 121-37.
4. Liberman MC, Brown MC. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 1986;24(1):17-36.
5. Popelar J, Valvoda J, Syka J. Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear Res 1999;135(1-2):61-70.
6. Hood LJ. A review of objective methods of evaluating auditory neural pathways. Laryngoscope 1989;109(11):1745-8.
7. Kumar A, Barman A. Effect of efferent-induced changes on acoustical reflex. Int J Audiol 2002;41:144-7.
8. Jeck LT, Ruth RA, Schoeny ZG. High frequency sensitization of the acoustic reflex. Ear Hear 1983;4(2):98-101.
9. Guinan Jr. JJ, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul Aharonson V. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAES. JARO 2003;4:521-40.
10. Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Eletrophysiologic assessment of central auditory processing disorders. In: Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Central Auditory processing disorders: new perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group;1997. p. 129-50.
11. Muchnik C, Roth DAE, Othman-Jebara R, Putter-Katz H, Shabtai EL, Hildesheimer M. Reduced medial olivocochlear bundle system function in children with auditory disorders. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:107-14.
12. Sanches SGG, Carvallo RMM. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic in children with auditory processing disorders. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11:366-372.
13. Jerger J, Musiek FE. Report Of The consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:467-74.
14. Schochat E, Pereira LP. Teste de Fala com Ruído. In: Pereira LD. Schochat E. Processamento Auditivo Central. Manual De Avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise 1997: 99-102.
15. Borges ACC. Adaptação do teste SSW para a língua portuguesa: nota preliminar. Acta Awho. 1986;5(Suppl 1): 38-40.
16. Silva CS. A supressão da emissão otoacústica transiente na presença de ruído branco contralateral. [Monografia]. São Paulo: Escola Paulista de Medicina;1997.
17. Durante AS, Carvallo RMM. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emission in neonates. Int J Audiol 2002;41:211-5.
18. Clarke EM, Ahmmed A, Parker D, Adams C. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children with specific language impairment. Ear Hear 2006;27(2):153-60.
19. a. Ed. São Paulo: Manole;1999. p. 486-98 .
20. Musiek FE, Smurzynski J, Bornstein SP. Otoacoustic emission testing in adults: an overview. AM J Otol. 1994;15 (Suppl.1):21-8.
21. Ryan S, Kemp DT. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996;94(1-2):140-7.
22. Hood LJ, Berlin CI, Hurley A, Cecola RP, Bell B. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects. Hear Res 1996;101(1-2):113-8.
23. Kumar AU, Vanaja CS. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 2004;25(2):142-6.
24. De Ceulaer GD, Yperman M, Daemers K, Driessche KV, Somers T, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data for a clinical test set-up. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:350-5.
25. Musiek FE, Oxholm VB. Anatomy and physiology of the central auditory nervous system: a clinical perspective. Audiology: Diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc., 2000. p. 45-71.
26. Carvallo RMM, Soares JC. Efeito do estímulo facilitador no limiar de reflexo acústico. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2004;70(2): 200-6.
27. Soares JC, Carvallo RMM. Redução do limiar do reflexo acústico em neonatos sem risco auditivo. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2006;72(1):49-54.
28. Hughes JR. Auditory sensitization. J Acoust Soc Am 1954;26(6):1064-70.
29. Deutsh L. Auditory sensitization in the human stapedius reflex. J Aud Res 1973;13:301-4.
30. Chobot JL, Wilson WR. The effect of sensitization on the acoustic reflex as a function of frequency. J Aud Res 1977;17:99-104.
31. Blood IM, Greenberg HJ. Low-level acoustic reflex thresholds. Audiology 1981;20:244-50.