Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs

Hearing Research

Volumn 135, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 61-70

  Popelar J ^a   Valvoda, J ^b   Syka, J ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Acoustic stimulation; Contralateral suppression; Electrical stimulation; Evoked otoacoustic emission; Guinea pig

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; GUINEA PIG; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; GUINEA PIGS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; ROUND WINDOW; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032768722     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00091-X     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aran, J.-M., Erre, J.-P., 1979. Long-term recording of cochleo-neural potentials in the guinea pig. In: Beagley, H.A. (Ed.), Technical Basis of Auditory Investigations. Oxford University Press, London, pp. 233-261.
2. Avan, P., Loth, D., Menguy, C., Teyssou, M., 1990. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig: Basic characteristics. Hear. Res. 44, 151-160.
3. Avan, P., Bonfils, P., Loth, D., Elbez, M., Erminy, M., 1995. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3012-3020.
4. Berlin, C.I., Hood, L.J., Wen, H., Szabo, P., Cecola, R.P., Rigby, P., Jackson, D.F., 1993. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 71, 1-11.
5. Brown, A.M., Gaskill, S.A., 1990. Measurement of the distortion products reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 840-849.
6. Brownell, W.E., Bader, C.R., Bertrand, D., de Ribaupierre, Y., 1985. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 227, 194-196.
7. Cazals, Y., Huang, Z.W., 1996. Average spectrum of cochlear activity: A possible synchronized firing, its olivo-cochlear feedback and alterations under anesthesia. Hear. Res. 101, 81-92.
8. 2 in humans: Evidence of a frequency specificity. Hear. Res. 68, 53-58.
9. Collet, L., Disant, F., Morgon, A., 1989. Effet de l'age sur les otoémissions acoustiques. Rev. Laryngol. Otol. Rhinol. Bord. 110, 67-68.
10. Davis, H., 1983. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear. Res. 9, 79-90.
11. Fex, J., 1959. Augmentation of cochlear microphonic by stimulation of efferent fibers to the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 50, 540-541.
12. 2 from human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 821-839.
13. Gifford, M.L., Guinan, J.J.Jr., 1987. Effects of electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear responses. Hear. Res. 29, 179-194.
14. Guinan, J.J., Jr., Gifford, M.L., 1988a. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. I. Rate-level functions. Hear. Res. 33, 97-114.
15. Guinan, J.J., Jr., Gifford, M.L., 1988b. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF. Hear. Res. 37, 29-46.
16. Hood, L.J., Berlin, C.I., Hurley, A., Cecola, R.P., Bell, B., 1996. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: Intensity effects. Hear. Res. 101, 113-118.
17. Kemp, D.T., 1978. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1386-1391.
18. 2 distortion generated in the cochlea. Hear. Res. 13, 39-46.
19. Khvoles, R., Freeman, S., Sohmer, H., 1996. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat. Hear. Res. 97, 120-126.
20. Liberman, M.C., 1989. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: Suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear. Res. 38, 47-56.
21. Lima da Costa, D., Erre, J.P., Charlet de Sauvage, R., Popelář, J., Aran, J.-M., 1997. Bioelectrical cochlear noise and its contralateral suppression: Relation to background activity of the eight nerve and effects of sedation and anesthesia. Exp. Brain Res. 116, 259-269.
22. Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K., Probst, R., Coats, A.C., 1987. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear. Res. 28, 173-189.
23. Moulin, A., Collet, L., Duclaux, R., 1993. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hear. Res. 65, 193-210.
24. Mountain, D.C., 1980. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 210, 71-72.
25. Norman, N., Thornton, A.R.D., 1993. Frequency analysis of the contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions by narrow-band noise. Br. J. Audiol. 27, 281-289.
26. Ohyama, K., Wada, H., Kobayashi, T., Takasaka, T., 1991. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 56, 111-121.
27. Popelář, J., Syka, J., 1993. Middle latency responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in unanaesthetized guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 67, 69-74.
28. Popelář, J., Erre, J.P., Aran, J.-M., Cazals, Y., 1994. Plastic changes in ipsi-contralateral differences of auditory cortex and inferior colliculus evoked potentials after injury to one ear in the adult guinea pig. Hear. Res. 72, 125-134.
29. Popelář, J., Lima da Costa, D., Erre, J.P., Avan, P., Aran, J.-M., 1996. Contralateral suppression of the ensemble background activity of the auditory nerve in awake guinea pigs: Effects of gentamicin. Audit. Neurosci. 3, 425-433.
30. Prasher, D., Ryan, S., Luxon, L., 1994. Contralateral suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and neuro-otology. Br. J. Audiol. 28, 247-254.
31. Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K., 1991. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2027-2067.
32. 2: Evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 1713-1720.
33. Puel, J.L., Durrieu, J.Ph., Rebillard, G., Vidal, D., Assie, R., Uziel, A., 1995. Comparison between auditory brainstem responses and distortion products otoacoustic emissions after temporary threshold shift in guinea pig. Acta Acust. 3, 75-82.
34. Rajan, R., Johnstone, B.M., 1983. Efferent effects elicited by electrical stimulation at the round window of the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 12, 405-417.
35. Siegel, J.H., Kim, D.O., 1982. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear. Res. 6, 171-182.
36. Smith, D.W., Erre, J.-P., Aran, J.-M., 1994. Rapid, reversible elimination of medial olivocochlear function following single injection of gentamicin in the guinea pig. Brain Res. 652, 243-248.
37. Syka, J., Popelář, J., 1994. Modulation of thresholds to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the intact ear in guinea pig by furosemide and noise. Hear. Res. 75, 1-10.
38. Ueda, H., Hattori, T., Sawaki, M., Niwa, H., Yanagita, N., 1992. The effect of furosemide on evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 62, 199-205.
39. Veuillet, E., Collet, L., Duclaux, R., 1991. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65, 724-735.
40. 2 cochlear emissions at all levels in the cat. In: Allen, J.B., Hall, J.L., Hubbard, A., Neely, S.T., Tubis, A. (Eds.), Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms. Springer, New York, pp. 322-329.
41. Zenner, H.P., Reuter, G., Plinkert, P.K., Gitter, A.H., 1990. Fast and slow motility of outer hair cells in vitro and in situ. In: Grandori, F., Cianfrone, G., Kemp, D. (Eds.). Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emissions. Advances in Audiology, Vol. 7. S. Karger, Basel, pp. 35-41.
42. Zwicker, E., Manley, G., 1981. Acoustical responses and suppression-period patterns in guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 4, 43-52.