|
Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 162-164
|
Visual evoked potentials with CRT and LCD monitors: When newer is not better
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CATHODE RAY OSCILLOSCOPE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
IMAGE QUALITY;
IMAGING AND DISPLAY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LIQUID CRYSTAL;
LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY;
MALE;
PATTERN RECOGNITION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;
VISUAL ACUITY;
BRAIN MAPPING;
COMPUTER;
COMPUTER INTERFACE;
ECONOMICS;
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;
ELECTRONICS;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
INSTRUMENTATION;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHOTOSTIMULATION;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
REACTION TIME;
STANDARD;
TIME;
VISUAL CORTEX;
ADULT;
BRAIN MAPPING;
COMPUTERS;
DATA DISPLAY;
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;
ELECTRONICS, MEDICAL;
EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LIQUID CRYSTALS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHOTIC STIMULATION;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
REACTION TIME;
TIME FACTORS;
USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;
VISUAL CORTEX;
|
EID: 60549091172
PISSN: 00283878
EISSN: 1526632X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000339041.29147.5f Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (6)
|