Multilingual language resources and interoperability

Language Resources and Evaluation

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-14

  Witt, Andreas ^a   Heid, Ulrich ^b   Sasaki, Felix ^c   Sérasset, Gilles ^d  

^a IDS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^c KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Interoperability; Language; Resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 60449120186     PISSN: 1574020X     EISSN: 15728412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-009-9088-x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D. L., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. F. (Eds.). (2003). The description logic handbook: Theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge: CUP.
2. S. Bird L. Liberman 2001 A formal framework for linguistic annotation Speech Communication 33 1-2 23 60
3. Boitet, C., Mangeot, M., & Sérasset, G. (2002). The PAPILLON project: Cooperatively building a multilingual lexical data-base to derive open source dictionaries & lexicons. In NLPXML '02: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on NLP and XML, Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA.
4. Burnard, L., & Bauman, S. (Eds.). (2007). TEI P5: Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange. Text Encoding Initiative Consortium.
5. Calzolari, N., Zampolli, A., & Lenci, A. (2002). Towards a standard for a multilingual lexical entry: The EAGLES/ISLE initiative. In CICLing '02: Proceedings of the third international conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 264-279). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
6. J. Carletta S. Evert U. Heid J. Kilgour J. Robertson H. Voormann 2003 The NITE XML toolkit: Flexible annotation for multi-modal language data Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 35 3 353 363
7. Carpenter, B. (1992). The logic of typed feature structures: With applications to unification grammars, logic programs and constraint resolution, No. 24 in Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. H. Cunningham 2002 GATE, A general architecture for text engineering Computers and the Humanities 36 223 254
9. Emerson, T., & O'Neil, J. (2006). Large corpus construction for chinese lexicon development. In Proceedings of the 29th unicode conference, San Francisco, USA.
10. R. Evans G. Gazdar 1996 DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation Computational Linguistics 22 22 167 216
11. S. Farrar D. T. Langendoen 2003 A linguistic ontology for the Semantic Web GLOT International 7 3 97 100
12. D. Ferrucci A. Lally 2004 UIMA: An architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment Natural Language Engineering 10 3-4 327 348
13. Francopoulo, G., Bel, N., George, M., Calzolari, N., Monachini, M., Pet, M., & Soria, C. (2006a). Lexical Markup Framework (LMF) for NLP multilingual resources. In Proceedings of the workshop on multilingual language resources and interoperability (pp. 1-8). Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia.
14. Francopoulo, G., George, M., Calzolari, N., Monachini, M., Bel, N., Pet, M., & Soria, C. (2006b). LMF for multilingual, specialized lexicons. In E. Hinrichs, N. Ide, M. Palmer, & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the LRE 2006 satellite workshop on merging and layering linguistic information. Genoa, Italy.
15. Görz, G. (2009, in prep.). Representing computational dictionaries in AI-oriented knowledge representation formalisms. In Dictionaries. An international handbook of lexicography-Supplementary volume: New developments in lexicography, with a special focus on computational lexicography, HSK-Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 10-19). Berlin: W. de Gruyter (to appear).
16. Helbig, H. (2001). Die semantische Struktur natürlicher Sprache: Wissensrepräsentation mit MultiNet. Berlin: Springer.
17. Ide, N., & Suderman, K. (2007). GrAF: A graph-based format for linguistic annotations. In Proceedings of the ACL workshop on linguistic annotation (pp. 1-8). Prague, Czech Republic.
18. ISO 24610-1:2006 (2006). Language resource management-Feature structures-Part 1: Feature structure representation. Technical Report, International Organization for Standardization.
19. Kaplan, R. M., & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 173-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Kemps-Snijders, M., Menzo Windhouwer, P. W., & Wright, S. E. (2008). ISOcat: corralling data categories in the wild. In European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international language resources and evaluation (LREC'08). Marrakech, Morocco.
21. Leech, G., & Wilson, A. (1996). EAGLES. Recommendations for the morphosyntactic annotation of corpora. Technical Report, Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards. EAGLES Document EAG-TCWG-MAC/R.
22. Lieske, C., & Sasaki, F. (2007). Internationalization Tag Set (ITS) 1.0. W3C Recommendation. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium.
23. Lyding, V., Chiocchetti, E., Sérasset, G., & Brunet-Manquat, F. (2006). The LexALP information system: Term bank and corpus for multilingual legal terminology consolidated. In A. Witt, G. Sérasset, S. Armstrong, J. Breen, U. Heid, & F. Sasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on multilingual language resources and interoperability (pp. 25-31). Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. McGuinness, D. L., & Harmelen, F. v. (2003). OWL web ontology language overview. Technical Report, W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
25. Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
26. P. Resnik M. B. Olsen M. Diab 1999 The bible as a parallel corpus: Annotating the 'Book of 2000 Tongues' Computers and the Humanities 33 12 129 153
27. Richardson, L., & Ruby, S. (2007). RESTful Web Services. O'Reilly.
28. Sasaki, F., Witt, A., & Metzing, D. (2003). Declarations of relations, differences and transformations between theory-specific treebanks: A new methodology. In J. Nivre (Ed.), The second workshop on treebanks and linguistic theories (TLT 2003). Sweden: Vaxjö University.
29. Schäfer, U. (2006). Middleware for creating and combining multi-dimensional NLP markup. In Proceedings of the EACL-2006 workshop on multi-dimensional markup in natural language processing. Trento, Italy.
30. Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work, Vol. 6 of Studies in corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
31. Trippel, T. (2006). The lexicon graph model: A generic model for multimodal lexicon development. Saarbrücken, Germany: AQ-Verlag.
32. Váradi, T., Krauwer, S., Wittenburg, P., Wynne, M., & Koskenniemi, K. (2008). CLARIN: Common language resources and technology infrastructure. In European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international language resources and evaluation (LREC'08). Marrakech, Morocco.
33. Witt, A., Rehm, G., Hinrichs, E., Lehmberg, T., & Stegmann, J. (2009). SusTEInability of Linguistic Resources through Feature Structures. Literary and Linguistic Computing. In print.
34. Witt, A., Sérasset, G., Armstrong, S., Breen, J., Heid, U., & Sasaki, F. (Eds.). (2006). Proceedings of the workshop on multilingual language resources and interoperability. Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
35. Wörner, K., Witt, A., Rehm, G., & Dipper, S. (2006). Modelling linguistic data structures. In B. T. Usdin (Ed.), Proceedings of extreme markup languages 2006. Montréal, Canada.