Thinking about biology: Modular constraints on categorization and reasoning in the everyday life of americans, maya, and scientists

Biological and Cultural Bases of Human Inference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 97-130

  Atran, Scott ^a,b   Medin, Douglas L ^c   Ross, Norbert ^d  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60449115091     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203774908     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. AHGA/PESA. (1992). Plan de desarollo integrado de Peten: Inventarioforestal. Convenio Gobier-nos Alemania y Guatemala, Santa Elena, Peten (SEGEPLAN).
2. Atran, S. (1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history: Towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Atran, S. (1998). Folkbiology and the anthropology of science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 547–609.
4. Atran, S. (1999). Itzaj Maya folk-biological taxonomy. In D. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folk biology (pp. 119–204). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
5. Atran, S. (2001). The case for modularity: Sin or salvation? Evolution and Cognition, 7,46–55.
6. Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Atran, S., Estin, P., Coley, J., Medin, D. (1997). Generic species and basic levels: Essence and appearance in folk biology, journal of Ethnobiology, 17, 22–45.
8. Atran, S., Medin, D., Lynch, E., Vapnarsky, V., Ucan Ek', E., Sousa, P. (2001). Folkbiology doesn't come from folkpsychology: Evidence from Yukatek Maya in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1, 3–42.
9. Atran, S., Medin, D., Ross, N., Lynch, E., Coley, J., Ucan Ek', E., Vapnarsky, V. (1999). Folkecology and commons management in the Maya lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 96, 7598–7602.
10. Atran, S., Medin, D., Ross, N., Lynch, E., Vapnarsky, V., Ucan Ek', E., Coley, J., Timura, C., Baran, M. (2002). Folk ecology, cultural epidemiology, and the spirit of the commons. A garden experiment in the Maya lowlands, 1991–2001. Current Anthropology, 43,421–450.
11. Bailenson, J., Shum, M., Atran, S., Medin, D., Coley, J. (2002). A bird's eye view: Biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures. Cognition, 84, 1–53.
12. Barsalou, L. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure of categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629–654.
13. Bartlett, H. (1940). History of the generic concept in botany. Bulletin of the Toney Botanical Club, 47, 319–362.
14. Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiologica! classification. Princeton: Princeton University.
15. Berlin, B., Breedlove, D., Raven, P. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 74, 214–242.
16. Bloch, M., Solomon, G., Carey, S. (2001). An understanding of what is passed on from parents to children: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1,43–68.
17. Bock, W. (1973). Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary taxonomy. Systematic Zoology, 22, 275–392.
18. Boster, J. (1988). Natural sources of internal category structure: Typicality, familiarity, and similarity of birds. Memory & Cognition, 16, 258–270.
19. Boster, J. (1991). The information economy model applied to biological similarity judgment. In L. Resnik, J. Levine, S. Teasely (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 203–225). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Brown, C. (1984). Language and living things: Uniformities in folk classification and naming. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21. Brown, D., Boysen, S. (2000). Spontaneous discrimination of natural stimuli by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 392–400.
22. Bulmer, R. (1974). Folkbiology in the New Guinea highlands. Social Science Information, 13, 9–28.
23. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
24. Carey, S. (1996). Cognitive domains as modes of thought. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Modes of thought (pp. 187–215). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Cerella, J. (1979). Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 68–77.
26. Coley, J., Medin, D., Atran, S. (1997). Does rank have its privilege? Inductive inferences in folkbiological taxonomies. Cognition, 63, 73–112.
27. Coley, J., Medin, D., Lynch, E., Proffitt, J., Atran, S. (1999). Inductive reasoning in folk-biological thought. In D. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folk biology (pp. 205–232). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
28. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origins of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.
29. Darwin, C. (1883 [1872]). On the origins of species by means of natural selection (6th ed.). New York: Appleton.
30. Diamond, J., Bishop, D. (1999). Ethno-ornithology of the Ketengban people, Indonesian New Guinea. In D. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folk biology (pp. 17–46). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
31. Diver, C. (1940). The problem of closely related species living in the same area. In J. Huxley (Ed.), The neiv systematics (pp. 303–328). Oxford: Clarendon.
32. Dougherty, J. (1979). Learning names for plants and plants for names. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 298–315.
33. Eldredge, N. (1986). Information, economics, and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 351–369.
34. Ellen, R. (1993). The cultural relations of classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
36. Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
37. Gelman, S., Wellman, H. (1991). Insides and essences. Cognition, 38, 214–244.
38. Ghiselin, M. (1981). Categories, life, and thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4,269–313.
39. Gil-White, F. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological "species" to the brain? Current Anthropology, 42, 515–554.
40. Griffiths, P. (2002). What is innateness? The Monist, 85, 70–85.
41. Hatano, G., Inagaki, K. (1999). A developmental perspective on informal biology. In D. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folk biology (pp. 321–354). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
42. Hauser, M. (2000). Wild minds: What animals really think. New York: Henry Holt.
43. Hays, T. (1983). Ndumba folkbiology and general principles of ethnobotanical classification and nomenclature. American Anthropologist, 85, 592–611.
44. Hermstein, R. (1984). Objects, categories, and discriminative stimuli. In H. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 233–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Hickling, A., Gelman, S. (1995). How does your garden grow? Evidence of an early conception of plants as biological kinds. Child Development, 66, 856–876.
46. Hirschfeld, L. (1996). Race in the making. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
47. Hunn, E. (1976). Toward a perceptual model of folk biological classification. American Ethnologist, 3, 508–524.
48. Hunn, E. (1982). The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist, 84, 830–847.
49. Inagaki, K. (1990). The effects of raising animals on children's biological knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 119–129.
50. Inagaki, K., Hatano, G. (1991). Constrained person analogy in young children's biological inference. Cognitive Development, 6, 219–231.
51. Johnson, K., Mervis, C. (1997). Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 248–277.
52. Johnson, K., Mervis, C., Boster, J. (1992). Developmental changes within the structure of the mammal domain. Developmental Psychology, 28, 74–83.
53. Johnson, S., Solomon, G. (1997). Why dogs have puppies and cats have kittens: The role of birth in young children's understanding of biological origins. Child Development, 68, 404–419.
54. Keil, F. (1995). The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 234–267). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Lopez, A., Atran, S., Coley, J., Medin, D., Smith, E. (1997). The tree of life: Universals of folk-biological taxonomies and inductions. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 251–295.
56. Lorenz, K. (1966). The role of gestalt perception in animal and human behavior. In L. White (Ed.), Aspects of form (pp. 157–178). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
57. Lynch, E., Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L. (2000). Tall is typical: Central tendency, ideal dimensions and graded category structure among tree experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 28, 41–50.
58. Medin, D., Lynch, E., Coley, J., Atran, S. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49–96.
59. Medin, D., Ross, N., Atran, S., Burnett, R., Blok, S. (2002). Categorization and reasoning in relation to culture and expertise. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 41, pp. 1–41). New York: Academic Press.
60. Osherson, D., Smith, E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A., Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 85–200.
61. Proffitt, J., Medin, D., Coley, J. (2000). Expertise and category-based induction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 811–828.
62. Rosch, E. (1975). Universals and cultural specifics in categorization. In R. Brislin, S. Bochner, W. Lonner (Eds.), Cross-cultural perspectives on learning (pp. 177–206). New York: Halstead.
63. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
64. Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Grey, W., Johnson, D., Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
65. Ross, N., Medin, D., Coley, J., Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 35–47.
66. Smith, E., Medin, D. (1981). Concepts and categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Sousa, P., Atran, S., Medin, D. (2002). Folkbiological essentialism: Further evidence from Brazil. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 195–203.
68. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
69. Sperber, D. (2001). In defense of massive modularity. Paper presented to the Innateness and Structure of the Mind Workshop, University of Sheffield.
70. Sperber, D., Wilson, D. (1996). Relevance (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
71. Stross, B. (1973). Acquisition of botanical terminology by Tzeltal children. In M. Edmonson (Ed.), Meaning in Mayan languages (pp. 107–141). The Hague: Mouton.
72. Tanaka, J. M., Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457–482.
73. Waddington, C. (1959). Canalisation of development and the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Nature, 183, 1654–1655.
74. Wallace, A. (1901 [1889]). Darwinism (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.
75. Warburton, F. (1967). The purposes of classification. Systematic Zoology, 16, 241–245.
76. Wolff, P., Medin, D., Pankratz, C. (1999). Evolution and devolution of folkbiological knowledge. Cognition, 73, 177–204.
77. Zubin, D., Kopcke, K.-M. (1986). Gender and folk taxonomy. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 139–180) [Proceedings of a symposium on categorization and noun classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.