The diagnosis and management of supraaortic arterial dissections

Current Opinion in Neurology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 80-89

  Goyal, Manu S ^a,b   Derdeyn, Colin P ^a,b,c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Carotid dissection; Dissecting aneurysm; Pseudoaneurysm; Vertebral dissection

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; HEPARIN;

ANEURYSM SURGERY; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTERY DISSECTION; ARTERY INJURY; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM RUPTURE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CAROTID ARTERY INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISSECTING ANEURYSM; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FOLLOW UP; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; STROKE; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SUPRAAORTIC ARTERY DISSECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL ARTERY STENOSIS;

CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL, DISSECTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; STROKE; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; VERTEBRAL ARTERY DISSECTION;

EID: 60449114052     PISSN: 13507540     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328320d2b2     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Schievink W. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:898-906.
2. Brandt T, Orberk E, Weber R, et al. Pathogenesis of cervical artery dissections: association with connective tissue abnormalities. Neurology 2001; 57:24-30.
3. Benninger D, Georgiadis D, Kremer C, et al. Mechanism of ischemic infarct in spontaneous carotid dissection. Stroke 2004; 35:482-485.
4. Schievink W, Mokri B, Whisnant J. Internal carotid artery dissection in a community. Rochester, Minnesota, 1987-1992. Stroke 1993; 24:1678-1680.
5. Mokri B, Silbert P, Schievink W, Piepgras D. Cranial nerve palsy in spontaneous dissection of the extracranial internal carotid artery. Neurology 1996; 46:356-359.
6. Silbert P, Mokri B, Schievink W. Headache and neck pain in spontaneous internal carotid and vertebral artery dissections. Neurology 1995; 45:1517-1522.
7. Zhou W, Huynh T, Kougias P, et al. Traumatic carotid artery dissection caused by bungee jumping. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46:1044-1046.
8. Siwiec R, Solomon G. Bilateral carotid artery dissection after dental work. Headache 2007; 47:1449-1450.
9. Hsu K, Kao H, Chen S. Backward somersault as a cause of childhood stroke: a case report of isolated middle cerebral artery dissection in an adolescent boy. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26:519.e513-519.e515.
10. Choi K, Oh S, Yang T, Lee T. Golfer's stroke from internal carotid artery dissection. Arch Neurol 2008; 65:1122-1123. An unfortunate report.
11. Baracchini C, Tonello S, Vitaliani R, et al. Vasomotion in multiple spontaneous cervical artery dissections. Stroke 2008; 39:1148-1151. This study supports the hypothesis that some form of arteriopathy underlies many cervical artery dissections.
12. McColgan P, Sharma P. The genetics of carotid dissection: meta-analysis of a MTHFR/C677T common molecular variant. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25:561-565.
13. Flis C, Jäger H, Sidhu P. Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: clinical aspects, imaging features and endovascular treatment. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:820-834.
14. Johnston D, Chapman K, Goldstein L. Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001; 57:2012-2014.
15. Willinsky R, Taylor S, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003; 227:522-528.
16. Kaufmann T, Huston Jr, Mandrekar J, et al. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19 826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007; 243:812-819. The largest trial of its kind, this study conclusively demonstrates the very low risk of permanent stroke due to DSA.
17. Kirsch E, Kaim A, Engelter S, et al. MR angiography in internal carotid artery dissection: improvement of diagnosis by selective demonstration of the intramural haematoma. Neuroradiology 1998; 40:704-709.
18. Nguyen Bui L, Brant-Zawadzki M, Verghese P, Gillan G. Magnetic resonance angiography of cervicocranial dissection. Stroke 1993; 24:126-131.
19. Levy C, Laissy J, Raveau V, et al. Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography. Radiology 1994; 190:97-103.
20. Zuber M, Meary E, Weder J, Mas J. Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic CT scan in cervical artery dissections. Stroke 1994; 25:576-581.
21. Bachmann R, Nassenstein I, Kooijman H, et al. Spontaneous acute dissection of the internal carotid artery: high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla with a dedicated surface coil. Invest Radiol 2006; 41:105-111.
22. Vertinsky A, Schwartz N, Fischbein N, et al. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:1753-1760. This study compared the accuracy and radiologists' preference for CTA as compared with MRI/MRA in diagnosing cervical artery dissection. It suggests that CTA is equivalent and superior to MRI/MRA in diagnosing carotid and vertebral dissections, respectively.
23. Naggara O, Oppenheim C, Toussaint J, et al. Asymptomatic spontaneous acute vertebral artery dissection: diagnosis by high-resolution magnetic resonance images with a dedicated surface coil. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2434-2435. This report suggests that a dedicated surface coil may improve MRI/MRA diagnosis of vertebral dissections.
24. Leclerc X, Godefroy O, Salhi A, et al. Helical CT for the diagnosis of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. Stroke 1996; 27:461-466.
25. Chen C, Tseng Y, Lee T, et al. Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25:769-774.
26. Pugliese F, Crusco F, Cardaioli G, et al. CT angiography versus colour-Doppler US in acute dissection of the vertebral artery. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007; 112:435-443. This trial demonstrates the utility of CTA but inefficacy of DUS for diagnosing vertebral dissections.
27. Elijovich L, Kazmi K, Gauvrit J, Law M. The emerging role of multidetector row CT angiography in the diagnosis of cervical arterial dissection: preliminary study. Neuroradiology 2006; 48:606-612.
28. de Bray J, Lhoste P, Dubas F, et al. Ultrasonic features of extracranial carotid dissections: 47 cases studied by angiography. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:659-664.
29. Sturzenegger M, Mattle H, Rivoir A, Baumgartner R. Ultrasound findings in carotid artery dissection: analysis of 43 patients. Neurology 1995; 45:691-698.
30. Dittrich R, Dziewas R, Ritter M, et al. Negative ultrasound findings in patients with cervical artery dissection. Negative ultrasound in CAD. J Neurol 2006; 253:424-433.
31. Benninger D, Georgiadis D, Gandjour J, Baumgartner R. Accuracy of color duplex ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous carotid dissection causing ischemia. Stroke 2006; 37:377-381.
32. Arnold M, Baumgartner R, Stapf C, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous carotid dissection with isolated Horner syndrome. Stroke 2008; 39:82-86. This well designed study demonstrated that DUS was not accurate in diagnosing carotid dissection in patients without ischemic symptoms.
33. Alecu C, Fortrat J, Ducrocq X, et al. Duplex scanning diagnosis of internal carotid artery dissections. A case control study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23:441-447. Another well designed trial supporting the use of DUS for diagnosing carotid dissections.
34. Caso V, Paciaroni M, Corea F, et al. Recanalization of cervical artery dissection: influencing factors and role in neurological outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 17:93-97.
35. Touzé E, Gauvrit J, Moulin T, et al. Risk of stroke and recurrent dissection after a cervical artery dissection: a multicenter study. Neurology 2003; 61:1347-1351.
36. Dittrich R, Nassenstein I, Bachmann R, et al. Polyarterial clustered recurrence of cervical artery dissection seems to be the rule. Neurology 2007; 69:180-186. This investigation demonstrated that the recurrence of cervical artery dissections may be higher than previously thought, particularly in arteries other than the one initially involved.
37. Kremer C, Mosso M, Georgiadis D, et al. Carotid dissection with permanent and transient occlusion or severe stenosis: long-term outcome. Neurology 2003; 60:271-275.
38. Wessels T, Mosso M, Krings T, et al. Extracranial and intracranial vertebral artery dissection: long-term clinical and duplex sonographic follow-up. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36:472-479.
39. Touzé E, Randoux B, Méary E, et al. Aneurysmal forms of cervical artery dissection: associated factors and outcome. Stroke 2001; 32:418-423.
40. Djouhri H, Guillon B, Brunereau L, et al. MR angiography for the long-term follow-up of dissecting aneurysms of the extracranial internal carotid artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1137-1140.
41. Benninger D, Gandjour J, Georgiadis D, et al. Benign long-term outcome of conservatively treated cervical aneurysms due to carotid dissection. Neurology 2007; 69:486-487. This investigation demonstrates that asymptomatic extracranial carotid pseudoaneuryms may not require endovascular or surgical management.
42. Mizutani T, Aruga T, Kirino T, et al. Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995; 36:905-911; discussion 912-903.
43. Sasaki O, Ogawa H, Koike T, et al. A clinicopathological study of dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery. J Neurosurg 1991; 75:874-882.
44. Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study Trial Investigators; Kerry S, Markus HS, Norris JW, et al. Antiplatelet therapy vs. anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection: rationale and design of the Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS). Int J Stroke 2007; 2:292-296.
45. Beletsky V, Nadareishvili Z, Lynch J, et al. Cervical arterial dissection: time for a therapeutic trial? Stroke 2003; 34:2856-2860.
46. Menon R, Markus H, Norris J. Results of a UK questionnaire of diagnosis and treatment in cervical artery dissection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79:612. This study found a diverse range of opinions among experts on the optimal treatment of carotid and vertebral dissections.
47. Menon R, Kerry S, Norris J, Markus H. Treatment of cervical artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79:1122-1127. This updated analysis confirms the lack of evidence supporting any specific therapy in treating supraaortic dissections. The results support that conservative measures are most appropriate in the typical dissection patient presenting with local symptoms or a single ischemic event.
48. Engelter S, Brandt T, Debette S, et al. Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. Stroke 2007; 38:2605-2611. This comprehensive systematic review supports the need for a randomized-controlled trial comparing antiplatelet therapy with anticoagulation in treating cervical artery dissections, but provides a reasonable approach to deciding between the two while awaiting such a trial.
49. Metso T, Metso A, Helenius J, et al. Prognosis and safety of anticoagulation in intracranial artery dissections in adults. Stroke 2007; 38:1837-1842. This report suggests that anticoagulation is safe in patients with intracranial artery dissections who do not initially present with a SAH.
50. Derex L, Nighoghossian N, Turjman F, et al. Intravenous tPA in acute ischemic stroke related to internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology 2000; 54: 2159-2161.
51. Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Sturzenegger M, et al. Thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke caused by cervical artery dissection: analysis of 9 patients and review of the literature. Arch Neurol 2002; 59:549-553.
52. Georgiadis D, Baumgartner R. Thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection. Front Neural Neurosci 2005; 20:140-146.
53. Kadkhodayan Y, Jeck D, Moran C, et al. Angioplasty and stenting in carotid dissection with or without associated pseudoaneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26:2328-2335.
54. Ansari S, Thompson B, Gemmete J, Gandhi D. Endovascular treatment of distal cervical and intracranial dissections with the neuroform stent. Neurosurgery 2008; 62:636-646; discussion 636-646. One of many case series demonstrating potential endovascular treatments of supraaortic arterial dissections.
55. Fava M, Meneses L, Loyola S, et al. Carotid artery dissection: endovascular treatment. Report of 12 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71:694-700. Another case series of endovascular treatment for carotid dissections.
56. Kim B, Suh S, Park S, et al. Management and clinical outcome of acute basilar artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008 [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1243. A case series suggesting the utility of endovascular approaches to treating basilar artery dissections.
57. Schulte S, Donas K, Pitoulias G, Horsch S. Endovascular treatment of iatrogenic and traumatic carotid artery dissection. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008; 31:870-874. Another case series of endovascular treatments for carotid artery dissections.
58. Shin Y, Kim H, Kim S. Stenting for vertebrobasilar dissection: a possible treatment option for nonhemorrhagic vertebrobasilar dissection. Neuroradiology 2007; 49:149-156. Another case series of patients with vertebrobasilar dissection treated with stenting.
59. Cohen J, Leker R, Gotkine M, et al. Emergent stenting to treat patients with carotid artery dissection: clinically and radiologically directed therapeutic decision making. Stroke 2003; 34:e254-e257.
60. Lavallée P, Mazighi M, Saint-Maurice J, et al. Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2007; 38:2270-2274. A controlled but small trial of emergent endovascular thrombolysis compared with intravenous thrombolysis in treating severe strokes due to carotid dissection. It supports the need for a trial to investigate this further.
61. Baumgartner R, Georgiadis D, Nedeltchev K, et al. Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2008; 39:e27-e28. A response to the trial above, suggesting again that a larger trial is needed before conclusive statements regarding such endovascular treatments can be made.
62. Cerrato P, Berardino M, Bottacchi E, et al. Vertebral artery dissection complicated by basilar artery occlusion successfully treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: three case reports. Neurol Sci 2008; 29:51-55. Another trial suggesting that an emergent endovascular approach to potentially severe ischemic complications of supraaortic dissections is feasible, and perhaps preferable.
63. Wakhloo A, Lanzino G, Lieber B, Hopkins L. Stents for intracranial aneurysms: the beginning of a new endovascular era? Neurosurgery 1998; 43:377-379.
64. Santos-Franco J, Zenteno M, Lee A. Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar system. A comprehensive review on natural history and treatment options. Neurosurg Rev 2008; 31:131-140; discussion 140. A well written comprehensive review on vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms supporting the use of stents only in treating these aneurysms.
65. Ausman J, Diaz F, Mullan S, et al. Posterior inferior to posterior inferior cerebellar artery anastomosis combined with trapping for vertebral artery aneurysm. Case report. J Neurosurg 1990; 73:462-465.
66. Yonekawa Y, Zumofen D, Imhof H, et al. Hemorrhagic cerebral dissecting aneurysms: surgical treatments and results. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008; 103:61-69. A case series of surgical treatments for ruptured dissecting aneurysms suggesting that this approach is feasible.
67. Oka F, Shimizu H, Matsumoto Y, et al. Ischemic stroke due to dissection of intracranial internal carotid artery: implications for early surgical treatment. Surg Neurol 2008; 69:578-584; discussion 584-585.
68. Nussbaum E, Madison M, Myers M, et al. Dissecting aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: retrospective evaluation of management and extended follow-up review in 6 patients. J Neurosurg 2008; 109:23-27.
69. Kleinpeter G. Why are aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery so unique? Clinical experience and review of the literature. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47:93-101.
70. Peluso J, van Rooij W, Sluzewski M, et al. Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intradural vertebral dissecting aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:102-106. This case series supports the use of coiling without stenting for the treatment of intradural vertebral dissectino, aneurysms.
71. Isokangas J, Siniluoto T, Tikkakoski T, Kumpulainen T. Endovascular treatment of peripheral aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:1783-1788. doi 10.3174/ajnr.A1218. This case series suggests that endovascular methods are sufficient in treating PICA dissecting aneurysms.
72. Cellerini M, Mangiafico S, Ammannati F, et al. Ruptured, dissecting posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: endovascular treatment without parent vessel occlusion. Neuroradiology 2008; 50:315-320. Another case series supporting endovascular methods for treating PICA dissecting aneurysms.
73. Yi A, Palmer E, Luh G, et al. Endovascular treatment of carotid and vertebral pseudoaneurysms with covered stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:983-987. Another case series supporting stent deployment for treating pseudoaneurysms.
74. Suzuki S, Kurata A, Iwamoto K, et al. Endovascular surgery using stents for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms and a review of the literature. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008; 51:193-198. Another case series supporting a stent-only technique for treating dissecting aneurysms.