When you assume … the reality of implementing a legally mandated substance abuse treatment program

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 36, Issue , 2004, Pages 175-180

  Wiley, Deane ^a   Beattie, Martha ^a   Nguyen, Hung ^a   Puckett, Katherine ^a   Banerjee, Kakoli ^a   Poon, Winnie ^a  

^a Alcohol and Drug Serv Res Inst   (United States)

Author keywords

Criminal justice; Drug offense; Implementation; Program development; Proposition 36; Substance abuse and crime prevention act of 2000

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES; ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MALE; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POLICY MAKING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC POLICY; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 6044269173     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2004.10400053     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Arndt, S.; Turvey, C. & Aaum, M. 2002. Older offenders, substance abuse, andAmerican Journal of Geriatic Psychiatry 10 (6): 733-39.
2. C'de Baca, J. 2001. A multiple risk factor approach for predicting DWI recidivism. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 21 (4): 207-15.
3. Mears, D.P; Kelly, W.R. & Durden, E.D.2001. Findings from a process evaluation of a statewide residential substance abuse treatment program for youthful offenders. Prison Journal 81 (2): 246-70.
4. Nielsen, A.L. & Scarpitti, F.R. 2002. Predicting retention in a therapeutic community for incarcerated substance abusers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 34 (3): 47-65.
5. Robbins, M.S.; Kumar, S.; Walker-Barnes, C.; Feaste, D.J.; Briones, E. & Szapocznik, J. 2002. Ethnic differences in comorbidity among substance-abusing adolescents referred to outpatient therapy. Journal of theAmerican Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 41 (4): 394-401.
6. Santa Clara County SACPA. 2002. StatusReportJuly I 2001 - December 31 2001. Santa Clara County, California: Proposition 36 Steering Committee.
7. Siegal, H.A.; Falck, R.S.; Wang, J. & Carlson, R.G. 2002. Predictors of drug treatment entry among crack-cocaine smokers. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 68 (2): 159-66.
8. Speiglman, R.; Klein, D.; Miller, R. & Nobel, A. 2003. Early implementation of Proposition 36: Criminal justice and treatment system issues in eight counties. Journal ofPsychoactive Drugs 35 (SARC1): 133-41.
9. Walton, M.A.; Blow, F.C.; Bingham, C.R. & Cherrnack, S.T. 2003. Individual and social/environmental predictors of alcohol and drug use 2 years following substance abuse treatment. Addictive Behaviors 28 (4): 627-42.