Early implementation of proposition 36: Criminal justice and treatment system issues in eight counties

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 35, Issue , 2003, Pages 133-141

  Speiglman, Richard ^a   Klein, Dorie ^a   Miller, Robin ^b   Noble, Amanda ^b  

^a PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Criminal justice; Drug offense; Proposition 36; Substance abuse and crime prevention act of 2000; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

CONFERENCE PAPER; COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; LAW; RESPONSIBILITY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; DATA COLLECTION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; REGIONAL HEALTH PLANNING; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038617491     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2003.10400508     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abrahamson, D. 2003. Personal communication between Richard Speiglman and Daniel Abrahamson, Director of Legal Affairs, Drug Policy Alliance, February 4.
2. Adamson, E. 2003. Bill would keep drug offenders out of prison. Topeka Capital-Journal. February 2. [accessed 12 February, 2003] Available at: www.cjonline.com/stories/020203/leg_drugbill.shtml.
3. Arizona Supreme Court. 2001. Drug Treatment and Education Fund: Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Phoenix: Arizona Supreme Court, Administrative Office of the Courts, Adult Services Division.
4. Arizona Supreme Court. 1999. Drug Treatment and Education Fund: Legislative Report, Fiscal Year I997-I998. Phoenix: Arizona SupremeCourt, Administrative Office of the Courts, Adult Services Division.
5. California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. 2002. Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (SACPA - Proposition 36), First Annual Report to the Legislature. Sacramento: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
6. California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. 2001. Fiscal Year 200I-2002 Budget Act Allocation: Statewide Summary Sheet. Sacramento: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
7. California Legislative Analyst's Office. 2000. Implementing Proposition 36: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities. Sacramento: California Legislative Analyst’s Office.
8. California Senate. 2001. Bill 223 (Burton, John). Drug Testing [accessed I March 2003]. Available at: www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/Ol-02/bill/sen/sb_0201 -0250/sb_223_bill_20011011_chaptered.pdf
9. Californians United Against Drug Abuse. 2002. We Oppose Proposition 36 [accessed 27 August 2002]. Available at: www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/mgi/campaign/2W/cal/general/caprop/prop36/website-no/coalition.html
10. Campaign for New Drug Policies. 2002. Drug Treatment Initiative Approved by Florida Supreme Court: 2004 Campaign Likely. [accessed 28 February 2003]. Available at: www.drugreform.org/news.tpl?action=2&newsid=1021657857104763
11. Campaign for New Drug Policies and Drug Policy Alliance. 2002. Measure 62 moves to U.S. Congress for Approval, Funding. [accessed 9 February 2003]. Available at: www.dcmeasure62.org/news.tpl
12. Colker, A.C. & Watson, A. 2001. California's Proposition 36 and Other State Diversion Programs: Moving Drug Offenders Out of Prison and Into Treatment. Washington, D.C.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
13. Curley, B. 2002. Prop 36 spawns initiatives in Florida, Ohio, and Michigan. Join Together Online [accessed 28 February 2003]. Available at: www.jointogether.org/sa/news/features/reader/0,1854,551088,00.html
14. Drug Policy Alliance. 2003. Michigan to release drug prisoners. Drug Policy News [accessed 10 February 2003]. Available at: www.drugpolicyalliance.org/news/2_06_2003michigan.cfm
15. Drug Policy Alliance. 2002a. Election Results 2002. [accessed 9 February 2003]. Available at: www.drugpolicyalliance.org/statebystate/election2002/initiatives2002.cfm
16. Drug Policy Alliance. 2002b. Kansas Considers Prison Expansion, Commission Proposes Alternative. [accessed 9 February 2003]. Available at: www.drugpolicyalliance.org/news/12_26_02kansas.cfm
17. Drug Reform Coordination Network. 2002a. New York Rockefeller law reform dies this year as Pataki, Democrats Deadlock. This Week Online 243 [accessed 28 February 2003]. Available at: www.drcnet.org/wol/243.htmlSnorockefellerreform
18. Drug Reform Coordination Network. 2002b. Marijuana decrim bill dead in New Mexico, other drug reform measures still breathing. This Week Online 222 [accessed 28 February 2003]. Available at: www.drcnet.org/wol/222.htmlSnewmexicostatehouse
19. Drug Reform Coordination Network. 2002c. At the Statehouse IV: Washington State legislation would reduce drug penalties, recognize social dealing. This Week Online 222 [accessed 12 February 2002]. Available at: www.drcnet.org/wol/222.htmlSwashingtonstatehouse
20. Drug Reform Coordination Network. 2002d. Hawaii "Treatment Not Jail" bill stalled as key legislator unveils plan for popular referendum on issue. This Week Online 227 [accessed I March 2003]. Available at: www.drcnet.org/wol/227.htmlShawaiibill
21. Gallegos, G. 2002. Battle lines drawn in drug policy debate. Albuquerque Tribune. January 9.
22. Janofsky, M. 2001. Governor's drug efforts show fruit in Sante Fe. New York Times February 14: A16.
23. Join Together Online. 2002a. Wisconsin Community Coalition Pushes for Treatment, not Prison. [accesces 28 February 2003]. Available at: www.jointogether.orglsa/news/srnes/readerU, l854,552798,00.html
24. Join Together Online. 2002b. Mich. Voters to Decide on Drug Sentencing Laws. [28 February 2003]. Available at: www.jointogether.org/sa/news/summariher!U,1854,552714,00.html
25. Join Together Online. 2002c. Hawaii Bill Focuses on Treatment for Drug Ofetiders. 28 1 2003. Available: wwwjointogether.org/sa/news/summaries/reader!U, l854,552324,00.html
26. Join Together Online. 2002d. Fla. Dmg-Refom Ballot Initiative Withdrawn. [28 February 2003]. Available at: www.jointogether.oig/sa/news/summariher!U, l854,550517,00.html
27. King County Bar Association. 2001. Report of the Task Force on the Use of Criminal Sanctions to the King County Bar Association Board of Trustees. Seattle, Washington: King County Bar.Association, Drug Policy Project. [accessed 28 February 2003]. Available at: www.kcba.org/drug_law/criminal.htm
28. Lindesmith Center-Drug Policy Foundation. 2001a. Statewide Report Card [accessed I March 2003]. Available at: www.prop36.org/pdf/statereport.pdf
29. Lindesmith Center-Drug Policy Foundation. 2001b. Washington State coalition offers alternative to drug war. Drug Policy News [accessed 28 February 2003]. Available at: www.drugpolicy.org/news/12_13_01washington2.cfm
30. New York Times. 2002. Time to move on drug law reform. New York Times June 13: Editorial.
31. New York Times. 2000. A better approach to drug offenders. New York Times October 26: Editorial.
32. Nieves, E. 2000. California gets set to shift on sentencing drug users. New York Times November 10: A18 Ohio Campaign for New Drug Policies 2002. Issue I, the Ohio Drug Treatment Initiative. [cited 9 February 2003]. Available at: www.ohiodrugrefom.org/index.tpl
33. Ramos, V.M. 2003. Governor's Plan Would Release Some Drug Offenders Early. [accessed 10 February 2003] Available at: www.newsday.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=ny-stcrim313110882jan31§ion=/news/local/state
34. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 2001. Florida officials oppose drug-reform initiative. Substance Abuse Policy Research Program Monthly Report October-November: 51.
35. Santana, A. 2003. Judge rejects D.C. plan to treat drug offenders. Washington Post. February II: Bl. [accessed 12 February 2003]. Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A54156-2003Febl0
36. Santana, A. 2002. Illicit drug, prosecutor initiatives approved. Washington Post. November 6: Bit. [accessed 12 February 2003]. Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A13726-2002Nov6
37. Sayles-Owen, Del. 2001. Substance Abuse Treatment and Testing Accountability Program: Senate Bill 223 (Burton). California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. All County Lead Agencies Letter No. 01-15. [accessed 9 February 2003]. Available at: www.adp.cahwnet.gov/SACPA/ACLA_Letter_O1-lS.shtml
38. Sykes, L. 2001. Attacking the cause of crime: Group pushing drug treatment instead of prison for offenders. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. December 28: Bl.
39. Uelmen, G., Abrahamson, D. N., Appel, J.K., Cox, A.L., and Taylor, W.A. 2002. Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. Progress Report. Sacramento: Drug Policy Alliance.
40. Waters, M. W. Remarks by Rep. Maxine Waters (Dem., Calif.), to the 2W Shadow Convention, August 15. Los Angeles. Reprinted in The Drug Policy Letter 48 (September-October):14-15.