Separate neural pathways for contour and biological-motion cues in motion-defined animal shapes

NeuroImage

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 246-252

  Ptito, Maurice ^a,b   Faubert, Jocelyn ^b   Gjedde, Albert ^a   Kupers, Ron ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biological motion; Contours; Dorsal pathway; Perception; PET; Ventral pathway

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN REGION; CEREBELLUM; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE TRACT; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUNNING; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; SCINTISCANNING; SUBICULUM;

ADULT; AMYGDALA; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBELLUM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED;

EID: 0041737625     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00082-X     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beintema, J.A., Lappe, M., 2002. Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5661-5663.
2. Bellefeuille, A., Faubert, J., 1998. Independence of contour and biologicalmotion cues for motion-defined animal shapes. Perception 27, 225-235.
3. Bertenthal, B.I., Pinto, J., 1994. Global motion processing of biological motions. Psychol. Sci. 5, 221-225.
4. Bertenthal, B.I., Proffit, D.R., Cutting, J.E., 1984. Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 37, 213-230.
5. Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D., Evans, A., 1996. Specific involvement of human parietal cortex and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J. Neurosci. 16, 3737-3744.
6. Bremmer, F., Duhamel, J-R., Ben Hamed, S., Graf, W., 2000. Stages of self-motion processing in primate posterior parietal cortex, in: Lappe, M. (Ed.), Neuronal Processing of Optic Flow, International Review of Neurobiology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 173-198.
7. Collins, D.L., Neelin, P., Peters, J.M., Evans, A., 1994. Automatic 3-D intersubject registration of of MR volumetric data in standardized talarach space. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18, 192-205.
8. Cutting, J.E., 1978. Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through manipulation of a biochemical invariant. Perception 7, 393-405.
9. Dittrich, W.H., 1993. Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception 22, 15-22.
10. Ffytche, D.H., Guy, C.N., Zeki, S., 1995. The parallel visual motion inputs into area VI and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain 118, 1375-1394.
11. Fox, R., McDaniel, C., 1982. The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218, 486-488.
12. Goodale, M.A., 1997. Visual routes to to perception and action in the cerebral cortex, in: Boller, F. (Ed.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 91-109.
13. Grèzes, J., Costes, N., Decety, J., 1998. Top down effects of the strategy to imitate on the brain areas engaged in the perception of biological motion. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 15, 553-582.
14. Grèzes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C., Decety, J., 2001. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions. NeuroImage 13, 775-785.
15. Grossman, E.D., Blake, R., 2001. Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vis. Res. 41, 1475-1482.
16. Grossman, E.D., Donnelly, M., Price, R., Morgan, V., Pickens, D., Neighbor, G., Blake, R., 2000. Brain areas involved in the perception of biological motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 711-720.
17. Howard, R.J., Brammer, M., Wright, I., Woodruff, P.W., Bullmore, E.T., Zeki, S., 1996. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Curr. Biol. 6, 1015-1019.
18. Johansson, G., 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 201-211.
19. Johansson, G., 1976. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. Psychol. Rev. 38, 379-393.
20. Lassonde, M., Faubert, J., Schiavetto, A., Bilodeau, L., 1993. Relative contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual systems to motion-defined forms. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34, 795.
21. Mather, G., West, S., 1993. Recognition of animal locomotion from dynamic point-light displays. Perception 22, 759-766.
22. Mather, G., Radford, K., West, S., 1992. Low-level visual processing of biological motion. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. 249, 149-155.
23. McArthur, L.Z., Baron, M.K., 1983. Towards an ecological theory of social perception. Psychol. Rev. 90, 215-238.
24. McLeod, P., Dittrich, W., Driver, J., Perrett, D., Zihl, J., 1996. Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a 'motion-blind' patient. Vis. Cogn. 3, 363-391.
25. Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., Lutes-Driscol, V., 1981. Perception of american sign language in dynamic point-light displays. J. Exp. Psych. Hum. Perc. Perf. 7, 430-440.
26. Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J.C., McCarthy, G., 1998. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J. Neurosci. 118, 2188-2199.
27. Servos, P., Osu, R., Santi, A., Kawato, M., 2002. The neural substrates of biological motion perception: an fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 12, 772-782.
28. Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., 1988. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Thieme, Stuttgart.
29. Ungerleider, L.G., Mishkin, M., 1982. Two cortical visual systems, in: Ingle, D., Goodale, M.A., Mansfield, R.J.W. (Eds.), Analysis of Visual Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 549-586.
30. Vaina, L.M., Lemay, M., Bienfang, D.C., Choi, A.Y., Nakayama, K., 1990. Intact biological motion and structure from motion perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: a case study. Vis. Neurosci. 5, 353-369.
31. Vaina, L.M., Solomon, J., Chowdhury, S., Sinha, P., Belliveau, J.W., 2001. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (20), 11656-11661.
32. Watson, C.C., Newport, D., Casey, M.E., 1996. Scatter stimulation technique for scatter correction in 3D PET, in: Grangeat, P., Amans, J.L. (Eds.), Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 255-268.
33. Worsley, K.J., Evans, A.C., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., 1992. A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 6, 900-918.
34. Worsley, K.J., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Vandal, A.C., Friston, K.J., Evans, A.C., 1996. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum. Brain Mapping 4, 458-473.