A robust unified approach to analyzing methylation and gene expression data

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1701-1710

  Khalili, Abbas ^a   Huang, Tim ^b   Lin, Shili ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; CELL CULTURE; GENE EXPRESSION; METHYLATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES; BIOLOGICAL VARIATIONS; BREAST CANCER CELLS; ERROR RATES; EXISTING METHODS; EXPRESSION LEVELS; EXPRESSION MICROARRAYS; FINITE MIXTURE MODELS; GENE EXPRESSION DATUM; MICROARRAY TECHNOLOGIES; MULTIPLE DATA TYPES; ROBUST PROCEDURES; TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORMS; UNIFIED APPROACHES; VARIABLE NUMBERS;

ALKYLATION;

EID: 60349095410     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahuja N., et al. Aging and DNA methylation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 58 (1998) 5489-5494
2. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrox B.N., and Caski. F. (Eds). Second International Symposium on Information Theory (1973), Akademiai Kiado, Budapest pp. 267
3. Atienza N., et al. On the consistency of MLE in finite mixture models of exponential families. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 137 (2007) 496-505
4. Bhowmick D., et al. A laplce mixture model for identification of differential expression in microarray experiments. Biostatistics 7 4 (2006) 630-641
5. Bickel P.J., and Levina E. Some theory for Fisher's Linear Discriminant function, "naive Bayes", and some alternatives when there are many more variables than observations. Bernoulli 10 6 (2004) 989-1010
6. Chen, J., Khalili, A., 2006. Order selection in finite mixture models. Technical Report. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo
7. Dean N., and Raftery A. Normal uniform mixture differential gene expression detection for cDNA microarrays. BMC Bioinformatics 6 1 (2005) 173
8. Dempster A.P., et al. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 39 (1977) 1-38
9. Domingos P., and Pazzani M. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach. Learn. 29 (1997) 103-130
10. Dudoit S., et al. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97 (2002) 77-87
11. Dudoit S., et al. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Statist. Sinica 12 (2002) 111-139
12. Efron B., et al. Empirical Bayes analysis of microarray experiment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96 (2001) 1151-1160
13. Efron B. Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: The choice of a null hypothesis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 99 (2004) 96-104
14. Fisher R.A., et al. The relationship between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of animal population. J. Animal Ecology 12 (1943) 42-58
15. Hathaway R.J. A constrainted formulation of maximum likelihood estimation for normal mixture distributions. Ann. Statist. 13 (1985) 795-800
16. Huber P.J. Robust Statistics (1981), John Wiley & Sons
17. Khalili A., et al. Gamma-normal-gamma mixture model for detecting differentially methylated loci in three breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Informatics 2 (2007) 43-54
18. Kiefer J., and Wolfowitz J. Consistency of the maximum likelihood estimates in the presence of infinitely many identical parameters. Ann. Math. Statist. 27 (1956) 887-906
19. Laird P.W. Cancer epigenetics. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14 Review issue 1 (2005) 65-76
20. Lewis D.D. Naive (Bayeses) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In: Nedellec C., and Rouveirol C. (Eds). Proc. of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (1998), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, DE 4-15
21. Schena M., et al. Parallel human genome analysis: Microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 10614-10619
22. Shen Y., et al. Abnormal CpG island methylation occurs during in vitro differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15 17 (2006) 2623-2635
23. Siegmund K., and Lin S. Epigenetics. In: Balding D., Bishop M., and Cannings. C. (Eds). Handbook of Statistical Genetics. 3rd Edition (2007), John Wiley Sons
24. McLachlan G.J., et al. A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays. Bioinformatics 22 13 (2006) 1608-1615
25. McLachlan G.J., and Peel D. Finite Mixture Models (2000), Wiley, New York
26. Newton M., and Kendziorski C.M. The Analysis of Gene Expression Data: Methods and Software (2003), Springer pp. 254-271
27. Newton M., et al. Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method. Biometrics 5 2 (2004) 155-176
28. Pan W., et al. A mixture model approach to detecting differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Funct. Integr. Genomics 3 (2003) 117-124
29. Parmigiani G., et al. A statistical framework for expression-based molecular classification in cancer. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 64 (2002) 717-736
30. Piotrowski A., et al. Microarray-based survey of CpG islands identifies concurrent hyper- and hypomethylation patterns in tissues derived from patients with breast cancer. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 7 (2006) 656-667
31. Toyota M., et al. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 8681-8686
32. Tusher V.G., et al. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 5116-5121
33. van't Wout A.B., et al. Cellular gene expression upon human immunodeficiency virus type I infection of CD4+-T-Cell lines. J. Virol. 77 (2003) 1392-1402
34. Yan P.S., et al. Applications of CpG Island microarrays for high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation. J. Nutr. 132 8 (2002) 2430S-2434