Uncertainties on mean areal precipitation: Assessment and impact on streamflow simulations

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 99-114

  Moulin, L ^a,b   Gaume, E ^a,c   Obled, C ^d  

^a Universite Paris Est   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

^d GRENOBLE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FLASH FLOOD; FLOOD FORECASTING; GEOSTATISTICS; HYDROGRAPH; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PRECIPITATION ASSESSMENT; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RAINGAUGE; STREAMFLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; LOIRE RIVER; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 60349083109     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-99-2009     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anctil, F., Lauzon, N., Andreassian, V., Oudin, L., and Perrin, C.: Improvement of rainfall-runoff forecasts through mean areal rainfall optimization, J. Hydrol., 328, 717-725, 2006.
2. Andrieu, H., French, M. N., Krajewski, W. R, and Georgakakos, K. R: Stochastic-dynamical rainfall simulation based on weather radar volume scan data, Adv. Water Resour., 26, 581-593, 2003.
3. Balme, M., Vischel, T., Lebel, T., Peugeot, C., and Galle, S.: Assessing the water balance in the Sahel: Impact of small scale rainfall variability on runoff: Part 1: Rainfall variability analysis, J. Hydrol., 331, 336-348, 2006.
4. Bardossy, A. and Das, T.: Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application, Hydrol. Rarth Syst. Sci., 12, 77-89, 2008, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/77/2008/.
5. Beven, K. and Kirby, M.: A physically-based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. B., 23, 419-438, 1979.
6. Borga, M.: Accuracy of radar rainfall estimates for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 267, 26-39, 2002.
7. Borga, M., Degli Esposti, S., and Norbiato, D.: Influence of errors in radar rainfall estimates on hydrological modeling prediction uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 42, W08 409, doi: 10.1029/2005WR00459, 2006.
8. Chahinian, N., Andreassian, V., Duan, Q., Fortin, V., Gupta, H., Hogue, T., Mathevet, T., Montanari, A., Moretti, G., Moussa, R., Perrin, C., Schaake, J., Wagener, T., and Xie, Z.: Comparison of the MOPEX 2004 results, in: Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment - MOPEX, IAHS Red Books 307, Wallingford, 313-338, 2006.
9. Carpenter, T. M. and Georgakakos, K. P.: Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow simulations of a distributed hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 298, 202-221, 2004.
10. Carpenter, T. M., Georgakakos, K. P., and Sperfslagea, J. A.: On the parametric and NEXRAD-radar sensitivities of a distributed hydrologic model suitable for operational use, J. Hydrol., 253, 169-193, 2001.
11. Chapon, B., Delrieu, G., Gosset, M., and Boudevillain, B.: Variability of rain drop size distribution and its effect on the Z-R relationship: A case study for intense Mediterranean rainfall, Atmos. Res., 87, 52-65, 2008.
12. Chen, Y.-C., Wei, C., and Yeh, H.-C.: Rainfall network design using kriging and entropy, Hydrol. Process., 22, 330-346, 2008.
13. Cole, S. J. and Moore, R. J.: Hydrological modelling using raingauge- and radar-based estimators of areal rainfall, J. Hydrol., 358(3), 159-181, 2008.
14. Creutin, J. and Obled, Ch.: Objectives analyses and mapping techniques for rainfall fields: an objective comparison, Water Resour. Res., 18, 413-431, 1982.
15. Datin, R.: Outils opérationnels pour la prevision des crues rapides: traitements des incertitudes et intégration des prévisions météorologiques. Developpements de TOPMODEL pour la prise en compte de la variabilité spatiale de la pluie. Application au bassin versant de 1'Ardèche., Ph.D. thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, Grenoble, 369 pp., 1998.
16. Delrieu, G.: The Cevennes-Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological observatory, Houille Blanche, 6, 83-88, 2003.
17. Delrieu, G., Ducrocq, V., Gaume, E., Nicol, J., Payrastre, O., Yates, E., Kirstetter, P. E., Andrieu, H., Ayral, P. A., Bouvier, C., Creutin, J. D., Livet, M., Anquetin, S., Lang, M., Neppel, L., Obled, C., Parent-du Chatelet, J., Saulnier, G. M., Walpersdorf, A., and Wobrock, W.: The catastrophic flash-flood event of 8-9 September 2002 in the Gard region, France: A first case study for the Cevennes-Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological Observatory, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 34-52, 2005.
18. Dulal, K., Takeuchi, K., and Ishidaira, H.: A framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in the Measurement of Precipitation Data: a case study for Nepal., in: Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-journal, Manuscript LW 06 100, Vol VIII., 2006.
19. Edijatno, Nascimento, N., Yang, X., Makhlouf, Z., and Michel, C.: GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 44(2), 263-277, 1999.
20. Gourley, J. J. and Vieux, B. E.: A method for identifying sources of model uncertainty in rainfall-runoff simulations, J. Hydrol., 327(1-2), 68-80, 2006.
21. Haberlandt, U.: Geostatistical interpolation of hourly precipitation from rain gauges and radar for a large-scale extreme rainfall event, J. Hydrol., 332, 144-157, 2007.
22. Jakeman, A. and Hornberger, G.: How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?, Water Resour. Res., 29(8), 2637-2649, 1993.
23. Johansson, B.: Areal precipitation and temperature in the Swedish mountain, An evaluation from a hydrological perspective, Nord. Hydrol., 31, 207-228, 2000.
24. Kieffer-Weisse, A. and Bois, P.: A comparison of methods for mapping statistical characteristics of heavy rainfall in the French Alps: the use of daily information, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 47(5), 739-752, 2002.
25. Klemeš, V: Operationnal testing of hydrological simulation models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 31(1), 13-24, 1986.
26. Krajewski, W. F. and Smith, J.: Radar hydrology: Rainfall estimation., Adv. Water Resour., 25(8-12), 1387-1394, 2002.
27. Lebel, T., Bastin, G., Obled, Ch., and Creutin, J.: On the accuracy of areal rainfall estimation: a case study, Water Resour. Res., 23, 2123-2134, 1987.
28. Mathevet, T.: Quels modeles pluie-debit globaux au pas de temps horaire? Développements empiriques et intercomparaison de modèles sur un large échantillon de bassins versants, Ph.D. thesis, ENGREF, 463 pp., 2005.
29. Melching, C.: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Chap. 3, Reliability estimation, 69-118, 1995.
30. Michaud, J., and Sorooshian, S.: Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed, Water Resour. Res., 30, 593-605, 1994.
31. Moulin, L.: Prévision des crues rapides avec des modèles hydrologiques globaux. Application aux bassins opérationnels de la Loire supérieure: évaluation des modélisations, prise en compte des incertitudes sur les précipitations moyennes spatiales et utilisation de prévisions météotorologiques, Ph.D. thesis, ENGREF, 643 pp., 2007.
32. Nandakumar, N. and Mein, R. G.: Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use change, J. Hydrol., 192, 211-232, 1997.
33. Nash, J. and Sutcliffe, J.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I - A discussion of principles., J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282-290, 1970.
34. Oudin, L., Perrin, C., Mathevet, T, Andreassian, V., and Michel, C:. Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 320, 62-83, 2006.
35. Paturel, J. E., Servat, E., and Vassiliadis, A.: Sensitivity of conceptual rainfall-runoff algorithms to errors in input data - case of the GR2M model, J. Hydrol., 168, 111-125, 1995.
36. Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andreassian, V: Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments, J. Hydrol., 242, 275-301, 2001.
37. Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andreassian, V.: Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 279, 275-289, 2003.
38. Refsgaard, J. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Brown, J., and van der Keur, P.: A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 1586-1597, 2006.
39. Retnam, M. T. P. and Williams, B. J.: Input errors in rainfall-runoff modelling, Math. Comput. Simulat., 30, 119-131, 1988.
40. Rode, M. and Suhr, U.: Uncertainties in selected river water quality data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 863-874, 2007, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst- .sci.net/11 /863/2007/.
41. Segond, M. L., Wheater, H. S., and Onof, C.: The significance of spatial rainfall representation for flood runoff estimation: A numerical evaluation based on the Lee catchment, UK, J. Hydrol., 347, 116-131, 2007.
42. Storm, B., Jensen, K. H., and Refsgaard, J. C.: Estimation of catchment rainfall uncertainty and its influence on runoff prediction, Nord. Hydrol, 19, 77-88, 1989.
43. Sun, X., Mein, R. G., Keenan, T. D., and Elliott, J. E: Flood estimation using radar and raingauge data, J. Hydrol., 239, 4-18, 2000.
44. Villarini, G., Mandapaka, P., Krajewski, W., and Moore, R.: Rainfall and sampling uncertainties: A rain gauge perspective., J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11102, doi:10.1029/2007JD009214, 2008.
45. Vischel, T. and Lebel, T.: Assessing the water balance in the Sahel: Impact of small scale rainfall variability on runoff. Part 2: Idealized modeling of runoff sensitivity, J. Hydrol., 333, 340-355, 2007.
46. Xu, C. Y. and Vandewiele, G. L.: Sensitivity of monthly rainfallrunoff models to input errors and data length, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 39, 157-176, 1994.