Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 320, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 62-83

  Oudin, Ludovic ^a   Perrin, Charles ^a   Mathevet, Thibault ^a   Andréassian, Vazken ^a   Michel, Claude ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

MOPEX; Rainfall runoff modeling; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOISTURE; RAIN; RANDOM ERRORS; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

MOPEX; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SOIL MOISTURE ACCOUNTING (SMA); WATER BALANCE;

WATERSHEDS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOISTURE; RAIN; RANDOM ERRORS; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS;

RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33644526931     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.016     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. L. Andersson Improvement of runoff models. What way to go? Nordic hydrology 23 1992 315 332
2. V. Andréassian, C. Perrin, C. Michel, I. Usart-Sanchez, and J. Lavabre Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models Journal of Hydrology 250 1-4 2001 206 223
3. V. Andréassian, C. Perrin, and C. Michel Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed models Journal of Hydrology 286 1-4 2004 19 35
4. K.J. Beven, and M.J. Kirkby A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24 1 1979 43 69
5. R.J.C. Burnash The NWS river forecast system - catchment modeling V.P. Singh COmputer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995 Water Resources Publications Highlands ranch, CO 311 366
6. D.R. Dawdy, and J.M. Bergmann Effect of rainfall variability on streamflow simulation Water Resources Research 5 5 1969 958 966
7. Edijatno, 1991. Mise au point d'un modèle élé mentaire pluie-débit au pas de temps journalier. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France, 242 pp.
8. N. Edijatno, N.O. Nascimento, X. Yang, Z. Makhlouf, and C. Michel GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters Hydrological Sciences Journal 44 2 1999 263 278
9. Farnsworth, R.K., Thompson, E.S., Peck, E.L., 1982. Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, NOAA technical report NWS no33, Washington, D.C.
10. R.P. Ibbitt Effects of random data errors on the parameter values for a conceptual model Water Resources Research 8 1 1972 70 78
11. Joukainen, S., 2000. Improving the calculation of potential evapotranspiration of the HBV model: application to the Ounasjoki watershed. in: T. Nilsson (Ed.), Nordic hydrological conference 2000. Nordic Hydrological Programme report. Swedish Hydrological Council, Uppsala, pp. 347-354.
12. D. Kavetski, S.W. Franks, and G. Kuczera Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modelling Q. Duan H.V. Gupta S. Sorooshian A.N. Rousseau R. Turcotte Calibration of Watershed Models vol. 6 Water Science and Application 2003 American Geophysical Union Washington DC 49 68
13. V. Klemeš Operational testing of hydrological simulation models Hydrological Sciences Journal 31 1 1986 13 24
14. T.S. Kokkonen, and A.J. Jakeman A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications Water Resources Research 37 9 2001 2345 2352
15. R.G. Mein, and B.M. Brown Sensitivity of optimized parameters in watershed models Water Resources Research 14 2 1978 299 303
16. C. Michel, C. Perrin, and V. Andreassian The exponential store: a correct formulation for rainfall-runoff modelling Hydrological Sciences Journal 48 1 2003 109 124
17. F.I. Morton Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrology Journal of Hydrology 66 1-4 1983 1 76
18. N. Nandakumar, and R.G. Mein Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use change Journal of Hydrology 192 1997 211 232
19. J.E. Nash, and J.V. Sutcliffe River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I - a discussion of principles Journal of Hydrology 10 1970 282 290
20. Oudin, L., Andréassian, L., Perrin, C., Anctil, F., 2004. Locating the sources of low-pass behavior within rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research 40(11), doi: D.1029/2004WR003291.
21. Oudin, L., Hervieu, F., Michel, C., Perrin, C., Andréassian, V., Anctil, F., Loumagne, C., 2005a. Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? - Part 2 - Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall-runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology 303(1-4), 290-306.
22. Oudin, L., Michel, C., Anctil, F., 2005b. Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? - Part 1 - Can rainfall-runoff models effectively handle detailed potential evapotranspiration inputs? Journal of Hydrology 303(1-4), 275-289.
23. L.H. Parmele Errors in output of hydrologic models due to errors in input potential evapotranspiration Water Resources Research 3 2 1972 348 359
24. J.E. Paturel, E. Servat, and A. Vassiliadis Sensitivity of conceptual rainfall-runoff algorithms to errors in input data - case of the GR2M model Journal of Hydrology 168 1995 111 125
25. C. Perrin, C. Michel, and V. Andréassian Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments Journal of Hydrology 242 2001 275 301
26. C. Perrin, C. Michel, and V. Andréassian Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation Journal of Hydrology 279 1-4 2003 275 289
27. A. Saltelli, K. Chan, and E.M. Scott Sensitivity Analysis 2000 Wiley New York pp. 504
28. J.C. Schaake, Q.-Y. Duan, V.I. Koren, and A. Hall Towards improved parameter estimation of land surface hydrology models through the Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX) A.J. Dolman Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Transfer Schemes and Large-Scale Hydrological Models Proc. of the 6th IAHS Scientific Assembly 2001 IAHS Maastricht, The Netherlands 91 97 Publication n°270
29. B.M. Troutman An analysis of input errors in precipitation-runoff models using regression with errors in the independent variables Water Resources Research 18 4 1982 947 964
30. B.M. Troutman Runoff prediction errors and bias in parameter estimation induced by spatial variability of precipitation Water Resources Research 19 3 1983 791 810
31. B.M. Troutman Errors and parameter estimation in precipitation-runoff modeling. 2. Case study Water Resources Research 21 8 1985 1214 1222
32. C.-Y. Xu, and G.L. Vandewiele Sensitivity of monthly rainfall-runoff models to input errors and data length Hydrological Sciences Journal 39 2 1994 157 176
33. W. Ye, B.C. Bates, N.R. Viney, M. Sivapalan, and A.J. Jakeman Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchments Water Resources Research 33 1 1997 153 166