Vergence modulation as a cue to movement in depth

Spatial Vision

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 581-592

  Howard, Ian P ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Image looming; Motion in depth; Vergence

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR DISPARITY; EXPERIMENT TESTS; IMAGE LOOMING; MOTION IN DEPTH; RADIAL PATTERNS; SELF-SIMILAR; VERGENCE; VERGENCES;

BINOCULARS; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

MODULATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 60249103015     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: 15685683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856808786451417     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bingham, G. P. and Pagano, C. P. (1998). The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching, J. Exper. Psychol. HPP 24, 145-168.
2. Brenner, E. and Smeets, J. B. J. (2000). Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction, Vision Research 40, 1649-1651.
3. Erkelens, C. J. and Collewijn, H. (1985). Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms, Vision Research 25, 583-588.
4. Foley, J. M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance, Perception 6, 449-460.
5. Foley, J. M. and Richards, W. (1972). Effects of voluntary eye movement and convergence on the binocular appreciation of depth, Perception and Psychophysics 11, 423-427.
6. Gray, R. and Regan, D. (1999). Motion in depth: adequate and inadequate simulation, Perception and Psychophysics 61, 236-245.
7. Howard, I. P., Fang, X., Allison, R. S. and Zacher, J. E. (2000). Effects of stimulus size and eccentricity on horizontal and vertical vergence, Exper. Brain Res. 130, 124-132.
8. Mon-Williams, M. and Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Some recent studies on the extraretinal contribution to distance perception, Perception 28, 167-181.
9. Pagano, C. C. and Bingham, G. P. (1998). Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: verbal and reaching errors are not correlated, J. Exper. Psychol. HPP 24, 1037-1051.
10. Regan, D. and Beverley, K. I. (1984). Psychophysics of visual flow patterns and motion in depth, in: Sensory Experience, Adaptation and Perception, L. Spillmann and B. R. Wooten (Eds), pp. 215- 240. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
11. Regan, D. and Kaushal, S. (1994). Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth, Vision Research 34, 163-178.
12. Regan, D., Erkelens, C. J. and Collewijn, H. (1986). Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth, Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 27, 584-597.
13. Rogers, B. J. and Bradshaw, M. F. (1993). Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis, Nature 361, 253-255.
14. Swenson, H. A. (1932). The relative influence of accommodation and convergence in the judgment of distance, J. Gen. Psychol. 7, 360-380.
15. Tresilian, J. R., Mon-Williams, M. and Kelly, B. M. (1999). Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance, Proc. Roy. Soc. B 265, 39-44.
16. Viguier, A., Clément, G. and Trotter, Y. (2001). Distance perception within near visual space, Perception 30, 115-124.