Motion in depth: Adequate and inadequate simulation

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 236-245

  Gray, R ^a   Regan, D ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033071370     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206885     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BEVERLEY, K. L., & REGAN, D. (1979a). Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? Vision Research, 19, 727-732.
2. BEVERLEY, K. I., & REGAN, D. (1979b). Visual perception of changing-size: The effect of object size. Vision Research, 19, 1093-1104.
3. BEVERLEY, K. I., & REGAN, D. (1980). Visual sensitivity to the shape and size of a moving object: Implications for models of object perception. Perception, 9, 151-160.
4. BEVERLEY, K. I., & REGAN, D. (1983). Texture changes versus size changes as stimuli for motion in depth. Vision Research, 23, 1387-1400.
5. CAVALLO, V., & LAURENT, M. (1988). Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception, 17, 623-632.
6. GRAY, R., & REGAN, D. (1996). Estimates of time to collision based on binocular and monocular visual information. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37, S652.
7. GRAY, R., & REGAN, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research, 38, 499-512.
8. GRAY, R., & REGAN, D. (in press). Adapting to expansion increases perceived time to collision. Vision Research.
9. HOYLE, F. (1957). The black cloud. London: Penguin.
10. LEE, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
11. LEVITT, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 65-69.
12. REGAN, D., & BEVERLEY, K. I. (1978a). Illusory motion in depth: After-effect to adaptation to changing size. Vision Research, 18, 209-212.
13. REGAN, D., & BEVERLEY, K. I. (1978b). Looming detectors in the human visual pathway. Vision Research, 18, 415-421.
14. REGAN, D., & BEVERLEY, K. I. (1979a). Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage. Vision Research, 19, 1331-1342.
15. REGAN, D., & BEVERLEY, K. I. (1979b). Visually guided locomotion: Psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. Science, 205, 311-313.
16. REGAN, D., & BEVERLEY, K. I. (1980). Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: Linearization of visual responses. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 70, 1289-1296.
17. REGAN, D., & BEVERLEY, K. I. (1981). Motion sensitivity measured by a psychophysical linearizing technique. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 71, 958-965.
18. REGAN, D., & HAMSTRA, S. J. (1993). Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and rate of angular expansion. Vision Research, 33, 447-462.
19. REGAN, D., & VINCENT A. (1995). Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field. Vision Research, 35, 1845-1857.
20. SANTEN, J. P. H., & SPERLING, G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 300-321.
21. SCHIFF, W., & DETWILER, M. L. (1979). Information judged in impending collision. Perception, 8, 647-658
22. VINCENT, A., & REGAN, D. (1997). Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: Effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 32-36.