Degradation kinetics and safety evaluation of buprofezin residues in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) and three different soils of India

Pest Management Science

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 183-188

  Oulkar, Dasharath P ^a   Banerjee, Kaushik ^a   Patil, Sangram H ^a   Upadhyay, Ajay K ^a   Taware, Praveen B ^a   Deshmukh, Madhukar B ^b   Adsule, Pandurang G ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GRAPES   (India)

^b SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Buprofezin; Dissipation; Half life; LC MS MS; Method validation; Preharvest interval; Residues in grapes; Residues in soil

Indexed keywords

BUPROFEZIN; INSECTICIDE; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; THIADIAZINE DERIVATIVE;

AGRICULTURAL SOIL; DEGRADATION; HOMOGENEITY; KINETICS; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; VINE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GRAPE; INDIA; KINETICS; SOIL POLLUTANT;

INDIA; INSECTICIDES; KINETICS; PESTICIDE RESIDUES; SOIL POLLUTANTS; THIADIAZINES; VITIS;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 60249084933     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1666     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Tomlin CDS (ed.), The Pesticides Manual, 13th edition. British Crop Protection Council, Alton, Hants, UK (2003).
2. Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program: Grape Vine Mealybug. [Online]. UC IPM. Available: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r302301911.html [18 April 2008].
3. Walton VM, Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Millar JG, Larsen TE and Malakar-Kuenen R, Pheromone-based mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. J Econ Entomol 99:1280-1290 (2006).
4. Lynch MR (ed.), Procedures for Assessing the Environmental Fate and Ecotoxicity of Pesticides. SETAC Europe, Brussels, Belgium, 54 pp. (1995).
5. Guidelines for the Official Testing of Plant Protectants, Part IV, 4-1, Fate of Plant Protectants in Soil - Degradation, Transformation and Metabolism. Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Germany (1986).
6. Environmental Assessment, Technical Assistance Handbook. NTIS PB87-175345, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Washington, DC (1987).
7. Banerjee K, Oulkar DP, Dasgupta S, Patil SB, Patil SH, Savant R, et al, Validation and uncertainty analysis of a multi-residue method for pesticides in grapes using ethyl acetate extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatog A 1173:98-209 (2007).
8. European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Official J European Communities L221:(17 August): 8-36 (2002).
9. Horwitz W and Albert R, The Horwitz ratio (HorRat): a useful index of method performance with respect to precision. J AOAC Internat 89:1095-1109 (2006).
10. Banerjee K, Oulkar DP, Patil SB, Dasgupta S and Adsule PG, Degradation kinetics and safety evaluation of tetraconazole and difenoconazole residues in grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Pest Manag Sci 64:283-289 (2008).
11. Banerjee K, Ligon AP and Spiteller M, Environmental fate of trifloxystrobin in soils of different geographical origins and photolytic degradation in water. J Agric Food Chem 54:9479-9487 (2006).
12. OriginPro, Version 7.0. OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA (2002).
13. Atlanta MRL Data Base Version 2.0, German Regulation on Pesticide MRLs (RHmV): Buprofezin. [Online]. German Federal Journal (21 May 2008). Available: http://www.kennzeichnungsrecht.de/english/mrlsearch.htm [27 May 2008].
14. Buprofezin (173). [Online]. Available: http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/ AGPP/Pesticid/JMPR/Download/99-eva/07Buprof.pdf [10 February 2008].
15. GEMS/Food Regional Diets: Regional Per Capita Consumption of Raw and Semi-processed Agricultural Commodities. [Online]. Global Environment Monitoring System/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme (revision September 2003). Available: http://www.who.int/foodsafety [28 May 2008].
16. Guidance document on residue analytical methods, 20 June 2000. European Union Commission Directorate of General Health and Consumer Protection, SANCO/825/00 rev. 6 (2000).
17. Hoskins WM, Mathematical treatment of the rate of loss of pesticide residue. FAO Plant Prot Bull 9:163-168 (1961).
18. Beulke S and Brown CD, Evaluation of methods to derive pesticide degradation parameters for regulatory modelling. Biol Fertil Soils 33:558-564 (2001).