Effects of presenting forest simulation results on the forest values and attitudes of forestry professionals and other forest users in Central Labrador

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 126-133

  Berninger, Kati ^a   Kneeshaw, Daniel ^a   Messier, Christian ^a  

^a Centre d'etude de la foret Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitude change; Attitude formation; Forest simulation; Scale; SELES; SFM

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; TIMBER;

ATTITUDE CHANGE; ATTITUDE FORMATION; FOREST SIMULATION; SCALE; SELES;

FORESTRY;

AGRICULTURE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; FORESTS; LAND USE; SIMULATION;

EID: 60149095585     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adamowicz W.L., and Burton P.J. Sustainability and sustainable forest management. In: Burton P.J., Messier C., Smith D.W., and Adamowicz W.L. (Eds). Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest (2003), NRC Research Press, Ottawa 41-64
2. Arvai J., and Gregory R. Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites. Environmental Science & Technology 37 8 (2003) 1469-1476
3. Berninger K. Attitudes des trois groupes d'intérêt sur les forêts et la foresterie en Mauricie. Rapport pour le projet TRIADE (2007). http://www.projettriade.ca/recherche_doc.php Available at: http://www.projettriade.ca/recherche_doc.php Viewed 17.4. 2007
4. Berninger, K., Kneeshaw, D., in review. Forest value orientations and attitudes towards forestry of interest groups in three regions varying in importance of commercial forestry. Submitted in Journal of Environmental Management.
5. Berninger K., Kneeshaw D., and Messier C. The role of cultural models in local perceptions of SFM - differences and similarities of interest groups from three boreal regions. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009) 740-751
6. Bright A.D., and Manfredo M.J. The influence of balanced information on attitudes toward natural resource issues. Society & Natural Resources 10 (1997) 469-483
7. Buchy M., and Hoverman S. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. Forest Policy and Economics 1 (2000) 15-25
8. Daniels S.E., and Walker G.B. Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16 2 (1996) 71-102
9. Davenport M.A., Leahy J.E., Anderson D.A., and Jakes P.J. Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: a case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environmental Management 39 3 (2007) 352-368
10. Eagly A.H., and Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes (1993), HBJ Publishers, Fortworth et al
11. Failing L., Gregory R., and Harstone M. Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: a decision-focused approach. Ecological Economics 64 1 (2007) 47-60
12. Fall A., and Fall J. A domain-specific language for models of landscape dynamics. Ecological Modelling 141 (2001) 1-18
13. Fall A., Daust D., and Morgan D.G. A framework and software tool to support collaborative landscape analysis: fitting square pegs to square holes. Transactions in GIS 5 1 (2001) 67-86
14. Forsyth, J., Innes, L., Deering, K., Moores, L., 2003. Forest Ecosystem Strategy Plan for Forest Management District 19 Labrador/Nitassinan. Innu Nation and Newfoundland and Labrador Dept.of Forest Resources and Agrifoods, Northwest River.
15. Fulton D.C., Manfredo M.J., and Lipscomb J. Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1 (1996) 24-47
16. Howell, D.C., 2004. Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson, Brooks/Cole. Belmont et al. 5. edition.
17. Hunter Jr. M.L. Wildlife, forests, and forestry: Principles of managing forests for biological diversity (1990), Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, Prentice Hall
18. Kaplan S., and Kaplan R. Cognition and environment - functioning in an uncertain world (1982), Praeger, New York
19. Levin S.A. Multiple scales and the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecosystems 3 (2000) 498-506
20. Messier C., and Kneeshaw D. Thinking and acting differently for sustainable management of the boreal forest. Forestry Chronicle 75 (1999) 929-938
21. Messier C., Fortin M.-J., Schmiegelow F., Doyon F., Cumming S.G., Kimmins J.P., Seely B., Welham C., and Nelson J. Modelling tools to assess the sustainability of forest management scenarios. In: Burton P.J., Messier C., Smith D.W., and Adamowicz W.L. (Eds). Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest (2003), NRC Research Press, Ottawa 531-580
22. McFarlane B., and Boxall P. Forest values and attitudes of the public, environmentalists, professional foresters, and members of public advisory groups in Alberta. Can. For. Serv. Northern For. Cen. Inf. Rep (2000) NOR-X-374
23. Petty P.E., and Carcioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19 (1986) 123-205
24. Rokeach M. The nature of human values (1973), Free Press, New York
25. Rokeach M. Understanding human values (1979), Free press, New York
26. Schusler T.M., Decker D.J., and Pfeffer M.J. Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 15 (2003) 309-326
27. Seekamp E., Hall T., Harris C., and Cole D. Attitudes and changes in attitudes about visitor management at the Green Lakes/South Sister area of the Three Sisters Wilderness: A study of four stakeholder involvement meetings in Oregon (2006), Wilderness Research Center, University of Idaho. http://www.cnr.uidaho.edu/wrc/Publications/publications.htm Available at: http://www.cnr.uidaho.edu/wrc/Publications/publications.htm Viewed 5.11. 2007
28. Sheppard S., and Meitner M. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 207 (2005) 171-187
29. Sheppard S.R.J., Lewis J.L., and Akai C. Landscape visualization: An extension guide for First Nations and rural communities (2004), Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton
30. Sturtevant B., Fall A., Kneeshaw D., Simon N., Papaik M., Berninger K., Doyon F., Morgan D., and Messier C. A toolkit modeling approach for sustainable forest management planning: achieving balance between science and local needs. Ecology and Society 12 2 (2007) 7. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art7/ [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art7/
31. Thompson J.R., Elmendorf W.F., McDonough M.H., and Burban L.L. Participation and conflict: lessons learned from community forestry. Journal of Forestry 103 4 (2005) 174-178
32. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., and O'Neill R.V. Landscape ecology in theory and practice (2001), Springer-Verlag, New York
33. Vaske J., and Donnelly M. A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society & Natural Resources 12 (1999) 523-537
34. Wilson J.S., and McGaughey R.J. Landscape-scale forest information: what is sufficient and what is appropriate?. Journal of Forestry 98 12 (2000) 21-27