The role of cultural models in local perceptions of SFM - Differences and similarities of interest groups from three boreal regions

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 740-751

  Berninger, Kati ^a   Kneeshaw, Daniel ^a   Messier, Christian ^a  

^a Centre d'etude de la foret Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cultural model; Forest use history; Forest value; Three pillar approach

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; HISTORY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TIMBER;

BOREAL REGIONS; COMMERCIAL FORESTRY; CULTURAL MODELS; FINLAND; FOREST USE; FOREST USE HISTORY; FOREST VALUE; INTEREST GROUPS; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT; THREE-PILLAR APPROACH;

FORESTRY;

BOREAL FOREST; CULTURAL INFLUENCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GEOGRAPHICAL THOUGHT; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; PERCEPTION; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

ARTICLE; BIOGEOGRAPHIC REGION; CANADA; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; FINLAND; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TREND STUDY;

CANADA; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; LABRADOR; MAURICIE; NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN EUROPE; QUEBEC [CANADA]; SCANDINAVIA;

METIS;

EID: 56249103797     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adamowicz W.L., and Burton P.J. Sustainability and sustainable forest management. In: Burton P.J., Messier C., Smith D.W., and Adamowicz W.L. (Eds). Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest (2003), NRC Research Press, Ottawa 41-64
2. Adamowicz W., Beckley T., MacDonald D.H., Just L., Luckert M., Murray E., and Phillips W. In search of forest resource values of indigenous peoples. Soc. Nat. Resour. 11 (1998) 51-66
3. Berninger K. Millaisia teemoja ja painotuksia sisältyy kaakkoissuomalaisten mielestä kestävään metsätalouteen? (Which themes and rankings do forest users in Southeastern Finland include in SFM? Thoughts of four interest groups, in Finnish). Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 3 (2006) 399-410
4. Brown K., Adger N.W., Tompkins E., Bacon P., Shim D., and Young K. Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecol. Econ. 37 (2001) 417-434
5. Brunson M.W., Shindler B., and Steel B. Consensus and dissension among rural and urban publics concerning forest management in the Pacific Northwest. In: Steel B. (Ed). Public Lands Management in the West (1997), Greenwood Publishing, Westport, Connecticut 83-94
6. Canada's Model Forest Program (CMFP). A User's Guide to Local Level Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. Natural Resources Canada (2000), CMEP
7. Elands B.H.M., O'Leary T.N., Boerwinkel H.W.J., and Wiersum K.F. Forests as a mirror of rural conditions. For. Policy Econ. 6 (2004) 469-482
8. Goodland R. The concept of environmental sustainability. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26 (1995) 1-24
9. Hellström E. Conflict cultures. Silva Fennica Monogr. 2 (2001)
10. Horne P., Koskela T., Ovaskainen V., Karppinen H., and Naskali A. Metsänomistajien suhtautuminen yksityismetsien monimuotoisuuden turvaamiseen ja sen toteutuskeinoihin. In: Horne P., Koskela T., and Ovaskainen V. (Eds). Metsänomistajien ja kansalaisten näkemykset metsäluonnon monimuotoisuuden turvaamisesta (2004) Finnish Forest Research Institute Report 933, Vantaa, pp. 47-73
11. Kant S., and Lee S. A social choice approach to sustainable forest management. For. Policy Econ. 6 (2004) 215-227
12. Karjalainen E. Metsänhoitovaihtoehtojen arvostus ulkoilualueilla. In: Kangas J., and Kokko A. (Eds). Metsän eri käyttömuotojen arvottaminen ja yhteensovittaminen (2001) Finnish Forest Research Institute Report 800, Kannus, pp. 183-185
13. Leskinen P., Leskinen L.A., and Tikkanen J. Assessing objectives of regional forest policy in Northern Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 19 (2004) 180-190
14. Linnros H., and Hallin P. The discursive nature of environmental conflicts: the case of the Øresund link. Area 33 (2001) 391-403
15. McDonald G.T., and Lane M.B. Forest management systems evaluation: using ISO14000. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 45 (2002) 633-652
16. McFarlane B.L., and Boxall P.C. Factors influencing forest values and attitudes of two stakeholder groups. Soc. Nat. Resour. 13 (2000) 649-661
17. McFarlane, B.L., Boxall, P.C., 2000b. Forest Values and Attitudes of the Public, Environmentalists, Professional Foresters, and Members of Public Advisory Groups in Alberta. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forest Centre Information Report NOR-X-374.
18. Meitner, M., Sheppard, S., Harshaw, H., Wilson, N., 2001. Arrow Forest District Social Values Survey Final Report. Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
19. Messier C., and Kneeshaw D. Thinking and acting differently for sustainable management of the boreal forest. For. Chron. 75 (1999) 929-938
20. Morgan D.L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Method Series. second ed. vol. 16 (1997), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London
21. Myers G., and McNaghten P. Rhetorics of environmental sustainability: commonplaces and places. Environ. Plan. A 30 (1998) 333-353
22. Petäjistö, L., Aarnio, J., Horne, P., Koskela, T., Selby, A., 2004. Hirvenmetsästäjien motiivit ja käsitykset sopivasta hirvikannan koosta. Finnish Forest Research Institute Report 928, Vantaa.
23. Pobihuschchy S.I. A perspective on the Indian nations in Canada. Can. J. Native Stud. 6 (1986) 105-128
24. Rantala T., and Primmer E. Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland. Environ. Sci. Pol. 6 (2003) 205-216
25. Robinson J. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 48 (2004) 369-384
26. Schusler T.M., Decker D.J., and Pfeffer M.J. Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 15 (2003) 309-326
27. Selby A., Koskela T., and Petäjistö L. Evidence of lay and professional forest-based development discourses in three contrasting regions of Finland. For. Policy Econ. 9 (2007) 633-646
28. Sheppard S. Knowing socially sustainable forest when you see one: implications for results-based forestry. For. Chron. 79 (2003) 866-875
29. Sheppard S., and Meitner M. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. For. Ecol. Manag. 207 (2005) 171-187
30. Shore B. Culture in Mind (1996), Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford
31. Smith P.D., and McDonough M.H. Beyond public participation. Soc. Nat. Resour. 14 (2001) 239-249
32. Stedman R.C. Is it really just social construction?. Soc. Nat. Resour. 16 (2003) 671-685
33. Strauss C., and Quinn N. A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Oakleigh
34. Tasanen, T., 2004. Läksi puut ylenemähän. Metsien hoidon historia Suomessa keskiajalta metsäteollisuuden läpimurtoon 1870 - luvulla. Summary: the History of silviculture in Finland from the Medieval to the Breakthrough of Forest Industry in 1870s. Finnish Forest Research Institute Report 920, Vammala.
35. Tindall, D.B., 2001. Variation in public values and visual quality preferences. In: Compendium of the Visual Resource Management Conference, Seeing beyond the Trees, Kamloops, BC, 17-19 April 2001, pp. 215-234.
36. Tindall D.B. Social values and the contingent nature of public opinion and attitudes about forests. For. Chron. 79 (2003) 692-705
37. Wang S. One hundred faces of sustainable forest management. For. Policy Econ. 6 (2004) 205-213
38. Watson, D.O.T., McFarlane, B.L., 2004. Stakeholder Considerations for Recreation and Forest Management in the Sunpine Forest Products Forest Management Agreement Area of Alberta. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forest Centre Information Report NOR-X-400.
39. Xu Z., and Bengston D.N. Trends in natural forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media 1982-1993. Soc. Nat. Resour. 10 (1997) 43-59