The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 630-635

  Nijkamp, Peter G ^a,b   Habets, Luc L M H ^a   Aartman, Irene H A ^a   Zentner, Andrej ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL MODELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 60049096331     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn059     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ackerman J L, Proffit W R 1970 Treatment response as an aid in diagnosis and treatment planning. American Journal of Orthodontics 57: 490-496
2. Atchison K A, Luke L S, White S C 1991 Contribution of pretreatment radiographs to orthodontists' decision making. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 71: 238-245
3. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J A 2005 The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Seminars in Orthodontics 11: 119-129
4. Bruks A, Enberg K, Nordqvist I, Hansson A S, Jansson L, Svenson B 1999 Radiographic examinations as an aid to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Swedish Dental Journal 23: 77-85
5. Cohen J 1988 Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale
6. Deutsche Geschellschaft für Kieferorthopädie 1997 Indications and frequency of X-rays in connection with orthodontic treatment. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 58: 287 (statement)
7. Downs W B 1948 Variations in facial relationship-their significance in treatment and prognosis. American Journal of Orthodontics 34: 812-840
8. Downs W B 1952 The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. American Journal of Orthodontics 38: 162-182
9. Ellis P, Benson P 2003 Does articulating study casts make a difference to treatment planning?. Journal of Orthodontics 30: 45-49
10. European Commission 1997 Council Directive 97/43/Euratom on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure. Official Journal of the European Communities, No. L180/22-27.9.07. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp. 22-27
11. European Commission 2004 European guidelines in radiation protection in dental radiography. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. Issue No. 136. Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, Directorate H-Nuclear Safety and Safeguards, Unit H.4 - Radiation Protection, Luxembourg
12. Farman A G 2005 ALARA still applies. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 100: 395-397
13. Graber T, Vanarsdall R 2000 Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. Mosby, Inc., St. Louis
14. Han U K, Vig K W L, Weintraub J A, Vig P S, Kowalski C J 1991 Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 100: 212-219
15. Isaacson K G, Thom A 2001 Guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics. British Orthodontic Society, London
16. Jacobson A 1975 The 'Wits' appraisal of jaw disharmony. American Journal of Orthodontics 67: 125-138
17. Jonas I 1976 The influence of training on the accuracy of roentgenographic cephalometric tracings. Radiologe 16: 427-431 (in German)
18. Keim R G, Gottlieb E L, Nelson A H, Vogels III D S 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 36: 553-568
19. Kuyl M H, Verbeeck R M, Dermaut L R 1994 The integumental profile: a reflection of the underlying skeletal configuration?. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 106: 597-604
20. Lau P Y, Cooke M S, Hägg U 1997 Effect of training and experience on cephalometric measurement errors on surgical patients. The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 12: 204-213
21. Lee R, MacFarlane T, O'Brien K 1999 Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions. Clinical Orthodontics and Research 2: 79-84
22. Major M P, Flores-Mir C, Major P W 2006 Assessment of lateral cephalometric diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy and posterior upper airway obstruction: a systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 130: 700-708
23. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements 2003 Radiation protection in dentistry. Report no. 145, NCRP Publications, Bethesda
24. Pae E-K, McKenna G A, Sheehan T J, Garcia R, Kuhlberg A, Nanda R 2001 Role of lateral cephalograms in assessing severity and difficulty of orthodontic cases. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 120: 254-262
25. Proffit W, Fields H 2000 Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby, Inc., St. Louis
26. Ribarevski R, Vig P, Dryland Vig K, Weyant R, O 'Brien K 1996 Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions. European Journal of Orthodontics 18: 77-80
27. Steiner C C 1953 Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 729-1725
28. Steiner C C 1959 Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthodontist 29: 8-29
29. Steiner C C 1960 The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 46: 721-735
30. Tweed C H 1954 The Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. American Journal of Orthodontics 24: 121-169
31. Vig P S, Dryland Vig K 1995 Decision analysis to optimize the outcomes for Class II division 1 orthodontic treatment. Seminars in Orthodontics 1: 139-148
32. Weintraub J A, Vig P S, Brown C, Kowalski C J 1989 The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 96: 462-466
33. Wenzel A, Anthonisen P N, Juul M B 2000 Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography. Caries Research 34: 214-218