Functional representation of living and nonliving domains across the cerebral hemispheres: A combined event-related potential/Transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 403-414

  Fuggetta, Giorgio ^a,b,f   Rizzo, Silvia ^b,c   Pobric, Gorana ^d   Lavidor, Michal ^e   Walsh, Vincent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILVER; SILVER CHLORIDE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COGNITION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SEMANTICS; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CEREBRUM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TEMPORAL LOBE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59949086430     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21030     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Szekely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., et al. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 344-380.
2. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (2003). FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 991-1001.
3. Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354-361.
4. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain the animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.
5. Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919.
6. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478-484.
7. Chao, L. L., Weisberg, J., & Martin, A. (2002). Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex 12 545-551.
8. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., &Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380, 499-505.
9. Dehaene, S. (1995). Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing in the normal human brain. NeuroReport, 6, 2153-2157.
10. Devlin, J. T., Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 77-94.
11. Devlin, J. T., Matthews, P. M., & Rushworth, M. F. (2003). Semantic processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: A combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15, 71-84.
12. Drager, B., Breitenstein, C., Helmke, U., Kamping, S., & Knecht, S. (2004). Specific and nonspecific effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on picture-word verification. European Journal of Neuroscience 20, 1681-1687.
13. Evans, A. C., Collins, D. L., & Holmes, C. J. (1996). Brain mapping. In A. W. Toga & J. C. Mazziotta (Eds.), The methods (pp. 343-361). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Fitzgerald, P. B., Fountain, S., Hoy, K., Maller, J., Enticott, P., Laycock, R., et al. (2007). A comparative study of the effects of repetitive paired transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortical excitability. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 165 265-269.
15. Flitman, S. S., Grafman, J., Wassermann, E. M., Cooper, V., O'Grady, J., Pascual-Leone, A., et al. (1998). Linguistic processing during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology, 50, 175-181.
16. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 78-84.
17. Fuggetta, G., Pavone, E. F., Fiaschi, A., & Manganotti, P. (2008). Acute modulation of cortical oscillatory activities during short trains of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: A combined EEG and TMS study. Human Brain Mapping 29, 1-13.
18. Fuggetta, G., Pavone, E. F., Walsh, V., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2006). Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A combined ERP/TMS study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 3277-3280.
19. Gainotti, G. (2000). What the locus of brain lesion tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: A review. Cortex 36 539-559.
20. Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehericy, S., Poline, J. B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., et al. (2000). Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1093-1104.
21. Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (2002). The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artefacts-A PET study. Neuroimage, 15, 143-152.
22. Grabowski, T. J., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-related lexical retrieval. Neuroimage, 7, 232-243.
23. Grafman, J., Pascual-Leone, A., Alway, D., Nichelli, P., Gomez-Tortosa, E., & Hallett, M. (1994). Induction of a recall deficit by rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroReport, 5, 1157-1160.
24. Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
25. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6 231-236.
26. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 339-356.
27. Halgren, E., Raij, T., Marinkovic, K., Jousmaki, V., & Hari, R. (2000). Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 69-81.
28. Hoshi, E., & Tanji, J. (2000). Integration of target and body-part information in the premotor cortex when planning action. Nature, 408, 466-470.
29. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 453-476.
30. Ilmberger, J., Rau, S., Noachtar, S., Arnold, S., & Winkler, P. (2002). Naming tools and animals: Asymmetries observed during direct electrical cortical stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 40, 695-700.
31. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 132-142.
32. Jennum, P., Friberg, L., Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A., & Dam, M. (1994). Speech localization using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology, 44, 269-273.
33. Kiefer, M. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 29, 100-116.
34. Kiefer, M. (2005). Repetition-priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: Further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 199-211.
35. Knecht, S., Floel, A., Drager, B., Breitenstein, C., Sommer, J., Henningsen, H., et al. (2002). Degree of language lateralization determines susceptibility to unilateral brain lesions. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 695-699.
36. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
37. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307 161-163.
38. Litvak, V., Komssi, S., Scherg, M., Hoechstetter, K., Classen, J., Zaaroor, M., et al. (2007). Artifact correction and source analysis of early electroencephalographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 37 56-70.
39. Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition 25 18-35.
40. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to event-related potentials and their neural origins. In An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
41. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057-1074.
42. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201.
43. Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649-652.
44. Moore, C. J., & Price, C. J. (1999). A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain, 122, 943-962.
45. Morbidi, F., Garulli, A., Prattichizzo, D., Rizzo, C., Manganotti, P., & Rossi, S. (2007). Off-line removal of TMS-induced artifacts on human electroencephalography by Kalman filter. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 293-302.
46. Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). A progressive category-specific semantic deficit for non-living things. Neuropsychologia, 38, 60-82.
47. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
48. Paz-Caballero, D., Cuetos, F., & Dobarro, A. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence for a natural/artifactual dissociation. Brain Research, 1067, 189-200.
49. Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Bettinardi, V., Bressi, S., Gorno-Tempini, M., Matarrese, M., et al. (1995). Different neural systems for the recognition of animals and man-made tools. NeuroReport, 6, 1637-1641.
50. Perani, D., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Gorno-Tempini, M., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (1999). Word and picture matching: A PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia, 37, 293-306.
51. Pilgrim, L. K., Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2005). Semantic processing of living and nonliving concepts across the cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 94, 86-93.
52. Pobric, G., Mashal, N., Faust, M., & Lavidor, M. (2008). The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 170-181.
53. Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 41 797-827.
54. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science 13 250-257.
55. Siebner, H. R., & Rothwell, J. (2003). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: New insights into representational cortical plasticity. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 1-16.
56. Sim, E. J., & Kiefer, M. (2005). Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 260-273.
57. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
58. Stewart, L., Meyer, B., Frith, U., & Rothwell, J. (2001). Left posterior BA37 is involved in object recognition: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1-6.
59. Stewart, L. M., Walsh, V., & Rothwell, J. C. (2001). Motor and phosphene thresholds: A transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study. Neuropsychologia, 39, 415-419.
60. Stippich, C., Mohammed, J., Kress, B., Hahnel, S., Gunther, J., Konrad, F., et al. (2003). Robust localization and lateralization of human language function: An optimized clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Neuroscience Letters, 346, 109-113.
61. Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxis atlas of the human brain. 3-Dimensional proportional system: An approach to cerebral imaging. Stuttgart:Thieme.
62. Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43-47.
63. Taylor, P. J., Nobre, A. C., & Rushworth, M. F. (2007). FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 391-399.
64. Thiel, A., Habedank, B., Herholz, K., Kessler, J., Winhuisen, L., Haupt, W. F., et al. (2006). From the left to the right:How the brain compensates progressive loss of language function. Brain and Language, 98, 57-65.
65. Thiel, A., Herholz, K., Koyuncu, A., Ghaemi, M., Kracht, L. W., Habedank, B., et al. (2001). Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: A positron emission tomography activation study. Annals of Neurology 50 601-629.
66. Thut, G., Ives, J. R., Kampmann, F., Pastor, M. A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). A new device and protocol for combining TMS and online recordings of EEG and evoked potentials. Journal of Neuroscience Methods,141, 207-217.
67. Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1319-1327.
68. Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75, 195-231.
69. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 95-112.
70. Vanrullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454-461.
71. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110 1273-1296.
72. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.
73. Weiller, C., Isensee, C., Rijntjes, M., Huber, W., Müller, S., Bier, D., et al. (1995). Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia:A positron emission tomographic study. Annals of Neurology, 37, 723-732.